SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fixing the bottom-6

Created by: SupremeBone
Team: 2020-21 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 29, 2020
Published: Jul. 29, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
The replacing and upgrading of Edmonton's sub-40 GF% bottom-6 has to be the key to the offseason- particularly Sheahan's 31% on-ice goal share.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,300,000
3$750,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,500,000
2$2,750,000
2$2,000,000
2$800,000
2$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,150,000
1$2,100,000
Trades
1.
EDM
  1. Faksa, Radek [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
EDM gets one of the better (potentially) available hard-minute 3Cs that fits the age group. They risk AA fitting in with the Stars and reverting to 30-goal form.
DAL
  1. Athanasiou, Andreas [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
DAL bolsters their W speed and offensive potential while Dickinson seems to present a viable opportunity to replace Faksa. They risk AA not fitting in.
2.
EDM
  1. Sutter, Brandon
Additional Details:
EDM opens up space for some young D and adds a solid RC that can fill-in/alternate with Faksa to cover the Sheahan role of high defensive zone starts.
VAN
  1. Russell, Kris
Additional Details:
VAN frees up 375k for free and reallocates cap to bolster their depth D rather than their depth F.
3.
EDM
    NJ acquires Neal at 2.875mil and then buys him out incurring a 958k cap hit for 6 years.
    NJD
    1. Neal, James ($958,000 retained)
    2. 2022 3rd round pick (EDM)
    Additional Details:
    The retained amount showed is actually the amount of the 50%-retained buyout (958k for 6 years).
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    2021
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the EDM
    2022
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the EDM
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$80,875,699$341,534$230,000$624,301

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $8,500,000$8,500,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$230,000$230K)
    RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $1,150,000$1,150,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $12,500,000$12,500,000
    C
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $3,200,000$3,200,000
    RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $1,300,000$1,300,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $875,000$875,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $4,375,000$4,375,000
    RW, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $2,150,000$2,150,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $1,200,000$1,200,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $915,000$915,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $4,167,000$4,167,000
    LD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $4,166,666$4,166,666
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $5,600,000$5,600,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $850,000$850,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    $2,100,000$2,100,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
    $800,000$800,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 6:07 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 3,205
    Likes: 1,077
    The Canucks trade itself seems fine, but I think both teams will have to wait and see how the offseason goes. Maybe the Canucks sign a defenseman, maybe the Oilers find a better forward to trade for.
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 6:12 p.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 2,425
    Likes: 1,566
    Quoting: Canucks33
    The Canucks trade itself seems fine, but I think both teams will have to wait and see how the offseason goes. Maybe the Canucks sign a defenseman, maybe the Oilers find a better forward to trade for.

    Thanks for the input! Hard to imagine who the Canucks would sign (given their cap situation) or that the Oilers would find a better fit to send Russell out (given his clause). However, it's the kind of hockey trade that can make sense regardless of when it occurs.
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 6:37 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2018
    Posts: 484
    Likes: 372
    Love the Stars deal. I just think EDM would want a small add like a pick or B- prospect.
    SlevinKalevra liked this.
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 7:24 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2018
    Posts: 2,646
    Likes: 1,170
    canucks cant do that trade no cap. we need picks not more players.
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 7:32 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 2,425
    Likes: 1,566
    Quoting: WallStreet83
    Love the Stars deal. I just think EDM would want a small add like a pick or B- prospect.


    Maybe in actuality, but I also thought the same might be true of the Stars. If both sides view it as needing a bit more from their side, likely means its at least close.
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 7:34 p.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 2,425
    Likes: 1,566
    Quoting: remowilliams
    canucks cant do that trade no cap. we need picks not more players.


    Canucks can't make the trade where they free up 375k in cap space (4.375mil out; 4mil in) because of cap? I believe you've misread or misunderstood the suggestion.
    remowilliams liked this.
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 7:40 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2018
    Posts: 2,646
    Likes: 1,170
    Edited Jul. 29, 2020 at 7:46 p.m.
    Quoting: SupremeBone
    Canucks can't make the trade where they free up 375k in cap space (4.375mil out; 4mil in) because of cap? I believe you've misread or misunderstood the suggestion.


    i think we have better ways to create cap space in my opinion but not a bad tarde.
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 7:47 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 2,425
    Likes: 1,566
    Quoting: remowilliams
    i think we have better ways to create cap space in my opinion but not a bad tarde.


    Ah, well that's fair enough. I'd say my suggestion could easily be in conjunction with those other cap saving moves, but I can understand that Russell isn't exactly the most exciting possibility (to say the least).
    remowilliams liked this.
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 8:00 p.m.
    #9
    Judd Bracket ripoff
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 6,927
    Likes: 3,575
    Quoting: SupremeBone
    Canucks can't make the trade where they free up 375k in cap space (4.375mil out; 4mil in) because of cap? I believe you've misread or misunderstood the suggestion.


    Quoting: remowilliams
    i think we have better ways to create cap space in my opinion but not a bad tarde.


    This does make sense for the Canucks if they feel they can’t re-sign Tanev.

    Russel is not as good as Tanev but he fills a similar role eg defensive specialist who blocks shots and gets injured. So dropping Sutter and Tanev and adding russel saves the Canucks closer to 5 million in cap.

    Canucks Right side would look pretty weak tho: Myers, Russel, Stetcher/rafferty. It depends what other moves they make as well
    remowilliams liked this.
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 8:50 p.m.
    #10
    SLIMY
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2019
    Posts: 267
    Likes: 55
    deals like this just dont make sense. even if Fitz doesnt have the foresight to realize that in 6 years from now, the devils are probably gonna need an extra mil in cap space, that alone wouldt be worth a 3rd rounder. On top of that buyouts still involve an exchange or real dollars. I don't know how you can look ownership in the eye and say 'hey I legitimately just bought a 3rd round draft pick for 6 million dollars of your money. please make arrangements to get the funds together.'
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 9:46 p.m.
    #11
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 2,425
    Likes: 1,566
    Quoting: The_Rocket
    This does make sense for the Canucks if they feel they can’t re-sign Tanev.

    Canucks Right side would look pretty weak tho: Myers, Russel, Stetcher/rafferty. It depends what other moves they make as well


    Well, I think the Canucks' RD will look weak no matter what they do this offseason (no offense meant, ofc). Their strengths will be their forward depth, Hughes and their goaltending if they bring back Markstrom. Russell can fill in and not get completely caved though he certainly won't drive positive results.
    Jul. 29, 2020 at 9:50 p.m.
    #12
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 2,425
    Likes: 1,566
    Quoting: Slimycoldcutswork
    deals like this just dont make sense. even if Fitz doesnt have the foresight to realize that in 6 years from now, the devils are probably gonna need an extra mil in cap space, that alone wouldt be worth a 3rd rounder. On top of that buyouts still involve an exchange or real dollars. I don't know how you can look ownership in the eye and say 'hey I legitimately just bought a 3rd round draft pick for 6 million dollars of your money. please make arrangements to get the funds together.'


    Fair counter. I guess that deal is more a general consideration for any team around the league- particularly one that's cash rich. This is a difficult matter with the current financial situation, but in general I don't think it's completely unreasonable given the minor commitment in cap per year. Perhaps a higher pick down the line or a prospect alongside the 3rd gets it done. I stand by the premise but will concede the specifics of the deal would take more finesse and a more money-rich team that isn't in dire straits cap-wise (Montreal maybe). Worst case, the overall set of deals still works even if Edmonton just buys out Neal and shaves some dollars off each deal they signed.
    Jul. 30, 2020 at 12:21 a.m.
    #13
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 5,286
    Likes: 2,731
    Quoting: SupremeBone
    Maybe in actuality, but I also thought the same might be true of the Stars. If both sides view it as needing a bit more from their side, likely means its at least close.


    I think it’s a close to fair swap. I’d want Edmonton to add a conditional pick based on AA’s production, but that might be greedy
    Jul. 30, 2020 at 1:48 a.m.
    #14
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 2,425
    Likes: 1,566
    Quoting: SlevinKalevra
    I think it’s a close to fair swap. I’d want Edmonton to add a conditional pick based on AA’s production, but that might be greedy


    A bit, but I can't fault ya for trying! I'd only consider it on a pretty strict condition like AA has to score less than 10 goals or something.
    Jul. 30, 2020 at 2:25 a.m.
    #15
    Kafle
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 2,467
    Likes: 483
    I read in some report that owners to due covid are less willing to buyout so if thats the case, why would New Jersey buyout neal?
    Jul. 30, 2020 at 1:12 p.m.
    #16
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 2,425
    Likes: 1,566
    Quoting: kafle22
    I read in some report that owners to due covid are less willing to buyout so if thats the case, why would New Jersey buyout neal?


    As I conceded earlier, that's intended as more of a placeholder deal for that kind of a trade. However, it was made without much consideration for how COVID will impact team owners' willingness to buyout players. It might work for a team that's on the verge of meeting the cap floor and feels their roster is filled out sufficiently. As they'd still need to hit the cap floor, maybe they'd consider that as a top-up where they could add an asset for money. Of course, that's largely team dependent and likely works better with a cash rich team that isn't trying to compete in the near-term.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll