SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs Wings

Created by: Boomer125
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 30, 2020
Published: Jul. 31, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Wings fans I don't know much about Lindstrom read up a little on him seems calm and nothing fancy - I'm sure a few of you will spew we have no use Johnsson - you do.

Curious on thoughts of the trade from Leafs out there
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,250,000
2$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
3$1,250,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Lindström, Gustav
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (VGK)
2.
TOR
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (TOR)
LAK
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (TOR)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$81,485,616$0$532,500$14,384
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$775,833$775,833 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 31, 2020 at 3:32 p.m.
#1
Hockee
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 868
Why are you dumping Johnsson and Dermott. They both are quality NHLers, who can fetch a better return than that
Jul. 31, 2020 at 3:36 p.m.
#2
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 5,359
Take out the 3rd and deal
Jul. 31, 2020 at 3:38 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: buffbry
Take out the 3rd and deal


Not a chance
Jul. 31, 2020 at 3:53 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,711
Likes: 14,477
Quoting: deys3232
Why are you dumping Johnsson and Dermott. They both are quality NHLers, who can fetch a better return than that


are you the guy that said dermott was better than seth jones, or the guy who said you wouldn't trade dermott straight up for ovechkin?
Jul. 31, 2020 at 3:59 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 1,224
The value is fair but what’s the incentive for us to give a cheap RHD to the Leafs who are in cap trouble.
Jul. 31, 2020 at 4:04 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: redwingsfan04
The value is fair but what’s the incentive for us to give a cheap RHD to the Leafs who are in cap trouble.


Yes he's cheap but certainly not an NHL player at this point , wings will have pretty good RHD prospect/Players when they draft Drysdale, Wings can definitely use an upgrade on LHD to go with their very young core, Johnsson isn't a cap dump, he's a very capable NHL player who will help the Wings offence and fits their rebuild timeline - TBH Leafs are getting fleeced pretty good here
Jul. 31, 2020 at 4:06 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: redwingsfan04
The value is fair but what’s the incentive for us to give a cheap RHD to the Leafs who are in cap trouble.


It's called improving your team - regardless of who you think you're helping - I really don't see how this trade helps the leafs
Jul. 31, 2020 at 4:11 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,202
Likes: 5,207
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
are you the guy that said dermott was better than seth jones, or the guy who said you wouldn't trade dermott straight up for ovechkin?


lol no way someone actually made those claims
Jul. 31, 2020 at 4:14 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 1,224
Quoting: Boomer125
It's called improving your team - regardless of who you think you're helping - I really don't see how this trade helps the leafs


Lindstrom isn’t as bad as you think. He definitely has a chance of being a 3rd pair D next year. He’s more of a defensive defenseman so his numbers aren’t that impressive.
Jul. 31, 2020 at 4:14 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,711
Likes: 14,477
Quoting: leafs101
lol no way someone actually made those claims


hand to god
Jul. 31, 2020 at 4:18 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 1,224
Quoting: Boomer125
It's called improving your team - regardless of who you think you're helping - I really don't see how this trade helps the leafs


I have to admit that after looking at this trade a bit longer I think the Wings would accept though
Jul. 31, 2020 at 4:31 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: redwingsfan04
Lindstrom isn’t as bad as you think. He definitely has a chance of being a 3rd pair D next year. He’s more of a defensive defenseman so his numbers aren’t that impressive.


Never said he was bad, you can't deny adding another potential 3rd pair D for the cost of Johnsson and Dermott in no way helps the leafs
Jul. 31, 2020 at 5:57 p.m.
#13
Hockee
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 868
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
are you the guy that said dermott was better than seth jones, or the guy who said you wouldn't trade dermott straight up for ovechkin?


I never said Dermott was better than Jones, I said they are very similar. And I said, it doesnt make sense for the Leafs to trade a cheap young up and coming defenseman for an aging Ovechkin on an expensive contract
Jul. 31, 2020 at 6:02 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 3,509
Quoting: deys3232
I never said Dermott was better than Jones, I said they are very similar. And I said, it doesnt make sense for the Leafs to trade a cheap young up and coming defenseman for an aging Ovechkin on an expensive contract

They are similar in that their current profession is hockey player other than that nothing about them is similar.
Jul. 31, 2020 at 6:06 p.m.
#15
Hockee
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 868
Quoting: BStinson
They are similar in that their current profession is hockey player other than that nothing about them is similar.


Taking a better look at their analytics says otherwise
Jul. 31, 2020 at 6:11 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 3,509
Quoting: deys3232
Taking a better look at their analytics says otherwise

Watching the game with my eyes says otherwise.
Jul. 31, 2020 at 6:14 p.m.
#17
Hockee
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 868
Quoting: BStinson
Watching the game with my eyes says otherwise.


Your eyes are very flawed and are incapable of understanding each and every single thing done by all 12 players on the ice at at time. Multiply that by all the games that are played every day for however many days, the human brain is incapable of keeping up. The stats however, can follow along with every game accurately
Jul. 31, 2020 at 6:18 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 3,509
Quoting: deys3232
Your eyes are very flawed and are incapable of understanding each and every single thing done by all 12 players on the ice at at time. Multiply that by all the games that are played every day for however many days, the human brain is incapable of keeping up. The stats however, can follow along with every game accurately

If analytics are so great why have all of the analytic GMs not accomplish anything? Analytics are one component to consider when evaluating a player. There’s multiple factors when comparing player x Vs player y. Quality of competition, line mates, stylistic play, scheme, etc. How many Norris nominations does Dermott have and is Dubas aware of Dermott’s underlying analytics?
Jul. 31, 2020 at 6:24 p.m.
#19
Hockee
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 868
Quoting: BStinson
If analytics are so great why have all of the analytic GMs not accomplish anything? Analytics are one component to consider when evaluating a player. There’s multiple factors when comparing player x Vs player y. Quality of competition, line mates, stylistic play, scheme, etc. How many Norris nominations does Dermott have and is Dubas aware of Dermott’s underlying analytics?


Dubas and the Leafs have done a pretty good job so far, though trading for Barrie wasnt a great idea. The Leafs dont have any bad contracts given to players that arent "stars" (Ceci is a UFA) how many other GMs can say that? Also keep in mind, the Leafs core hasnt hit their prime yet (except Tavares). Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Rielly, Robertson, Sandin, Liljegren and Dermott will be scary good in a few years. Pair that with veterans in Tavares, Hyman, Muzzin and Andersen (if he stays).

Also, pretty much everything Chayka has done says he isnt an analytics guy. (Keller was extremely overpaid, Kessel was never good analytically, Hall looked terrible this year, OEL was given too much for too long) So dont try to tell me he was an analytics guy.
Jul. 31, 2020 at 6:47 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 3,509
Quoting: deys3232
Dubas and the Leafs have done a pretty good job so far, though trading for Barrie wasnt a great idea. The Leafs dont have any bad contracts given to players that arent "stars" (Ceci is a UFA) how many other GMs can say that? Also keep in mind, the Leafs core hasnt hit their prime yet (except Tavares). Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Rielly, Robertson, Sandin, Liljegren and Dermott will be scary good in a few years. Pair that with veterans in Tavares, Hyman, Muzzin and Andersen (if he stays).

Also, pretty much everything Chayka has done says he isnt an analytics guy. (Keller was extremely overpaid, Kessel was never good analytically, Hall looked terrible this year, OEL was given too much for too long) So dont try to tell me he was an analytics guy.

Chayka worked for a company called “ Stathletes” prior to working for the Coyotes. Yes, you aren’t drastically over paying any of your non-stars but that’s a major qualifier for such a short history at the helm of Dubas. It still doesn’t make sense that if Dermott has these truly amazing underlying analytics why isn’t Dubas an analytics GM pushing him to get more ice time? Analytics should be pushed with a grain of salt as they aren’t always the greatest measuring tool without context. I remember seeing years ago people saying Brendan Smith is a monster and had better analytics than Doughty, he is now a cap dump....
Jul. 31, 2020 at 7:01 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: BStinson
If analytics are so great why have all of the analytic GMs not accomplish anything? Analytics are one component to consider when evaluating a player. There’s multiple factors when comparing player x Vs player y. Quality of competition, line mates, stylistic play, scheme, etc. How many Norris nominations does Dermott have and is Dubas aware of Dermott’s underlying analytics?


Jones has certainly been in the Norris conversation a few seasons running, he's been officially nominated once - Dermott doesn't compare to Jones - resumes aren't even close
BStinson liked this.
Jul. 31, 2020 at 7:21 p.m.
#22
Hockee
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 868
Quoting: Boomer125
Jones has certainly been in the Norris conversation a few seasons running, he's been officially nominated once - Dermott doesn't compare to Jones - resumes aren't even close


The awards voters arent very smart. Im sure we all know that.
Jul. 31, 2020 at 7:30 p.m.
#23
Hockee
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 868
Quoting: BStinson
Chayka worked for a company called “ Stathletes” prior to working for the Coyotes. Yes, you aren’t drastically over paying any of your non-stars but that’s a major qualifier for such a short history at the helm of Dubas. It still doesn’t make sense that if Dermott has these truly amazing underlying analytics why isn’t Dubas an analytics GM pushing him to get more ice time? Analytics should be pushed with a grain of salt as they aren’t always the greatest measuring tool without context. I remember seeing years ago people saying Brendan Smith is a monster and had better analytics than Doughty, he is now a cap dump....


Look at the teams that use analytics the most and compare them to teams that dont use much analytics.

The Leafs, Canes, Avs and Bolts have the biggest analytics departments. Look at where they are now/where they will be in a few years.

And teams like the Sabres and Sharks that dont have a large analytics department.

Theres a big difference in where the 2 teams are right now
Jul. 31, 2020 at 9:22 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 3,509
Quoting: deys3232
Look at the teams that use analytics the most and compare them to teams that dont use much analytics.

The Leafs, Canes, Avs and Bolts have the biggest analytics departments. Look at where they are now/where they will be in a few years.

And teams like the Sabres and Sharks that dont have a large analytics department.

Theres a big difference in where the 2 teams are right now

Every team minus two (Anaheim & Islanders since last year) employs at minimum one analyst/developer and some also outsource this work to an outside firm.

Here is a list of employees from the start of the season by each team. This doesn’t include outside vendors that aid in the construction, cleaning, and modeling so some teams (That source specifically mentions Montreal and Panthers) will have more on staff.
https://mobile.twitter.com/hayyyshayyy/status/1167874932874694659/photo/1
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll