SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dubas taking notes from Masai

Created by: leafschamp
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 5, 2020
Published: Aug. 5, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Obviously RHD is the position Toronto wants to Improve on. Columbus was reportedly high on Marner last season when he was an RFA. With Marner, Columbus gets an offensive weapon they need who plays penalty kill as well. They also get Dermott who could blossom to a solid top 4 for years to come. You also get Bracco who hasn't had an opportunity with the leafs but was at one time considered a very good prospect for Toronto who may thrive given an opportunity in Columbus...a bit of a gamble. Toronto gets the #1 RHD d man they're looking for as well as a veteran presence for their bottom 6 forward group. RHD is at a premium and one of the best in the league in his prime will not cost cheap. All in all, I highly doubt Columbus ever considers trading Jones (unless he's thinking about testing free agency) and also I highly doubt Toronto trades Marner (if there's one player I believe has the best chance to stay a Leaf for his career on the roster, it's Marner).
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,250,000
2$925,000
2$925,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,750,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Jones, Caleb
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (EDM)
2.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,706,783$0$400,000$2,793,217
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,750,000$2,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 5, 2020 at 4:18 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
NO.... Columbus isn’t trading Jones for Marner. We can’t afford Marners contract and when Savard leaves as a UFA Columbus won’t have a top 4 RHD.
Nhl_oilers and Viqsi liked this.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 4:26 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,210
And Edmonton isn’t trading Jones for Johnsson. We also don’t have the cap, and that’s too much to give for him.
arab05 liked this.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 4:29 p.m.
#3
Unbiased Hawks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 373
Likes: 138
As good as he is, Marner's contract is immovable.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 4:33 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 696
I like the jones idea
TWOminutes4surging liked this.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 4:50 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,210
Quoting: MMXD
I like the jones idea




Which one? Haha
Aug. 5, 2020 at 5:38 p.m.
#6
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,601
Likes: 3,095
No. Every Seth Jones proposal. All of them. The answer is no.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 5:41 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Ajp_18
NO.... Columbus isn’t trading Jones for Marner. We can’t afford Marners contract and when Savard leaves as a UFA Columbus won’t have a top 4 RHD.


Columbus reportedly offered Marner and offersheet, so apparently they were willing to pay him big money. But let's just go with no one wants a 90+ point player because it's smarter to pay 3 guys the same amount to watch them all score 30 points.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 5:57 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 401
Gaudreau for Marner straight up. TOR gets the cap savings. And gets much worse.

Let's do it.

There is no deal that TOR and CLB could strike that sees Jones leaving CLB...Jones is 50% the cap hit of Marner...and even if TOR could afford to split the difference by retaining salary on Marner, Jones is far more valuable. We're talking about a Top 5 RD in the entire league here...in his prime...at a $5.4M cap hit...and with a NTC.

Would need to get really, really creative with a third team involved to somehow make it work. Even then, the price for Jones is astronomical.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 6:26 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Columbus reportedly offered Marner and offersheet, so apparently they were willing to pay him big money. But let's just go with no one wants a 90+ point player because it's smarter to pay 3 guys the same amount to watch them all score 30 points.


Offersheet is different. Trading your best player for him is something else. Columbus would have to move someone else to make the cap work and now we’re down Jones and that other player for Marner at the very least and for a team built on defence trading their best defenseman for a wing isn’t a good option. Would I pay 4 1sts and no signs Nyqvist for Marner 100%. Would I trade Jones+ for Marner not a chance. Columbus adds Marner to the roster those 1sts are early 20s, we move Jones for Marner and Columbus is really not much better Or even better at all then they are now if PLD is the other player who leaves via an offersheet that MTL keeps threatening.
Viqsi liked this.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 8:14 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Ajp_18
Offersheet is different. Trading your best player for him is something else. Columbus would have to move someone else to make the cap work and now we’re down Jones and that other player for Marner at the very least and for a team built on defence trading their best defenseman for a wing isn’t a good option. Would I pay 4 1sts and no signs Nyqvist for Marner 100%. Would I trade Jones+ for Marner not a chance. Columbus adds Marner to the roster those 1sts are early 20s, we move Jones for Marner and Columbus is really not much better Or even better at all then they are now if PLD is the other player who leaves via an offersheet that MTL keeps threatening.


You offence is a problem, having a 90 point player makes you a better team. Even at the cost of Jones. You do have good depth on D. That is clear.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 8:18 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 696
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Which one? Haha


Damn right, the Caleb Jones idea
Nhl_oilers liked this.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 8:34 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
You offence is a problem, having a 90 point player makes you a better team. Even at the cost of Jones. You do have good depth on D. That is clear.


If you mean 3rd pair players or a constantly injured Murray sure. This also means we probably have to lose both Savard and Murray to make the 11 mil contract work.

You’re right offense is the issue, but there’s other ways to fix that that don’t give your roster a crippling whole, because Savard and Jones are the only 2 RHD we have and Peeke is the only one who’s top 4 rated prospect. I’ve come to realize that Columbus d strength is on the left side, we have a good, but very limited right side, we can’t afford to move one for a wing. Maybe for a center, but not a wing.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 9:07 p.m.
#13
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,601
Likes: 3,095
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
You offence is a problem, having a 90 point player makes you a better team. Even at the cost of Jones. You do have good depth on D. That is clear.

There's literally nothing the Leafs have that makes giving up Jones worthwhile. (Well, maybe Matthews would do, although we'd be in contract trouble as a result).

If you'd like those four 1sts in exchange for Marner, though (replicating the offersheet scenario), then let's talk.
Aug. 5, 2020 at 11:15 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Ajp_18
If you mean 3rd pair players or a constantly injured Murray sure. This also means we probably have to lose both Savard and Murray to make the 11 mil contract work.

You’re right offense is the issue, but there’s other ways to fix that that don’t give your roster a crippling whole, because Savard and Jones are the only 2 RHD we have and Peeke is the only one who’s top 4 rated prospect. I’ve come to realize that Columbus d strength is on the left side, we have a good, but very limited right side, we can’t afford to move one for a wing. Maybe for a center, but not a wing.


Depends on what the GM is going to be facing pressure wise. If you can't score enough to win, that's going to put heat under management.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll