SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

pens fan would you do this remake

Created by: acj
Team: 2020-21 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 18, 2020
Published: Aug. 18, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$3,325,000
5$3,325,000
5$6,325,000
4$3,505,000
4$4,505,000
5$3,350,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,500,000
4$7,500,000
4$4,750,000
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. Stalock, Alex
  2. 2021 1st round pick (PIT)
MIN
  1. Johnson, Jack
  2. Murray, Matt [RFA Rights]
  3. 2020 3rd round pick (PIT)
2.
3.
PIT
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (ANA)
  2. 2021 6th round pick (ANA)
4.
5.
PIT
  1. Domi, Max [RFA Rights]
6.
PIT
  1. Montour, Brandon [RFA Rights]
  2. Olofsson, Victor [RFA Rights]
BUF
  1. Aston-Reese, Zach
  2. Lafferty, Sam [RFA Rights]
  3. Riikola, Juuso [RFA Rights]
  4. Tanev, Brandon
  5. 2021 2nd round pick (PIT)
7.
TBL
  1. Malkin, Evgeni
  2. Zucker, Jason
  3. 2021 5th round pick (PIT)
8.
PIT
  1. 2021 4th round pick (COL)
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2021
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the COL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$79,940,875$0$1,032,500$1,559,125
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
$3,350,000$3,350,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$6,325,000$6,325,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,325,000$3,325,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
$3,505,000$3,505,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$894,167$894,167
C, LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$764,167$764,167 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
C
RFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,325,000$3,325,000
G
UFA - 3
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$785,000$785,000
G
UFA - 2
$4,505,000$4,505,000
RD
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:37 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
I thought that Zucker, Malkin for Hedman was going to the the worst trade, but then you outdid yourself...

Dumoulin for a 4th? What is up with Dumoulin for a 4th?
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:39 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 878
Likes: 115
Quoting: Yojimbo
I thought that Zucker, Malkin for Hedman was going to the the worst trade, but then you outdid yourself...

Dumoulin for a 4th? What is up with Dumoulin for a 4th?


i just chose a random pick him for a 6th is probably what hell go for
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:40 a.m.
#3
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 16,185
Likes: 20,496
Quoting: acj
i just chose a random pick him for a 6th is probably what hell go for


Dumoulin for a 6th? I can't tell if you're a troll or no
AndrewLadd liked this.
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:41 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 986
I wouldn't do Stalock for Murray (cheaper, had a better year, expansion draft, not interested in a goalie trade anyways) so bringing in Johnson's deal with a 3rd as sweetener for a 1st is moronic to me. Thanks but no thanks
TanSor liked this.
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:43 a.m.
#5
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 1,881
Sharks would quickly decline that one.
FunMustBeAlways liked this.
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:44 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 878
Likes: 115
Quoting: SevenLeg
Dumoulin for a 6th? I can't tell if you're a troll or no


what would you do its a thought you have a problem and if you really think crying over Dumoulin going for a 6th then you have issues he could go for anything i just chose a random pick because i dont know his exact worth
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:47 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Let me get this straight: you want the Wild to take on a $3M plug, a struggling goalie who while talented is at an all-time low in terms of value, and a 3rd for an unprotected first round pick that may be a lottery pick and a goalie who is extremely cheap and has provided great value for us? Hard pass. Wouldn't even do it without the first, we need the cap space.
C21 and LumberJacques liked this.
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:51 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 878
Likes: 115
Quoting: TanSor
Let me get this straight: you want the Wild to take on a $3M plug, a struggling goalie who while talented is at an all-time low in terms of value, and a 3rd for an unprotected first round pick that may be a lottery pick and a goalie who is extremely cheap and has provided great value for us? Hard pass. Wouldn't even do it without the first, we need the cap space.


for who, you need goaltending i wont be suprised if they trade dubnyk whos gonns be your starter then huh. sure aint gonna be stalock he's not gonna be able to handle the starting job the only reason he did good was because he new the team was a wild card plus he had dubnyk to "coach" him.
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:53 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Sharks laugh at that one. Why would we want an older worse more expensive dump for our young guy?
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:55 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 878
Likes: 115
Quoting: papishark
Sharks laugh at that one. Why would we want an older worse more expensive dump for our young guy?


sharks arent even going to resign him so whats the big deal
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:56 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Quoting: acj
sharks arent even going to resign him so whats the big deal


Um lol why would we not do that? Because he had a bad year? That just means he will be cheaper for us
Aug. 18, 2020 at 10:58 a.m.
#12
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 1,881
Quoting: acj
sharks arent even going to resign him so whats the big deal


Lol what?
Aug. 18, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 878
Likes: 115
Quoting: papishark
Um lol why would we not do that? Because he had a bad year? That just means he will be cheaper for us


same with murray were letting him go the sharks are still holding on they need to let go
Aug. 18, 2020 at 11:01 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: acj
for who, you need goaltending i wont be suprised if they trade dubnyk whos gonns be your starter then huh. sure aint gonna be stalock he's not gonna be able to handle the starting job the only reason he did good was because he new the team was a wild card plus he had dubnyk to "coach" him.


Stalock will be our starter, he looked great in the play ins and was great for the second half of the season. Dubnyk wasn't his "coach", no idea where you got that but it's not true at all. If we want an upgrade, we'll just sign someone and not have to give up picks/assets
Aug. 18, 2020 at 11:11 a.m.
#15
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 1,881
Quoting: acj
same with murray were letting him go the sharks are still holding on they need to let go


Wow Labanc who put up 56 points the previous season (and saw consistent improvement), is our top RH forward, had a drop in production consistent with the let down of this team. Murray has a horrible year as an RFA goalie, with internal competition pushing him out of a job. 2 completely different scenarios.
papishark and FunMustBeAlways liked this.
Aug. 18, 2020 at 11:18 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 1,535
Quoting: SevenLeg
Dumoulin for a 6th? I can't tell if you're a troll or no


While a Troll is still possible, I suspect that this is a person that simply never watches games and is just looking at stats to gauge value. He sees 8 points and $4.1M and figures that Dumoulin is a bad player and a cap dump.
nateca44 liked this.
Aug. 18, 2020 at 11:40 a.m.
#17
nateca44
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 114
Likes: 18
Quoting: Yojimbo
While a Troll is still possible, I suspect that this is a person that simply never watches games and is just looking at stats to gauge value. He sees 8 points and $4.1M and figures that Dumoulin is a bad player and a cap dump.


Im as confused as you. doumolin plays top minutes and is young enough....for a 6th? ouch
Aug. 18, 2020 at 11:49 a.m.
#18
Hockey God Genius
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 811
Nope
Aug. 18, 2020 at 1:10 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 2,868
Sharks decline. Replace Bjugstad with a 2nd and just maybe we consider.
acj liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll