SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Making the Playoffs

Created by: crowismydad
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 19, 2020
Published: Aug. 19, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$4,250,000
2$3,500,000
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
3$2,750,000
Trades
1.
CBJ
  1. Saad, Brandon
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (CHI)
  3. 2021 2nd round pick (CHI)
Additional Details:
25% Salary Retained on Saad by the Blackhawks
2.
CHI
  1. 2021 6th round pick (LAK)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$72,625,139$1,090,244$5,050,000$8,874,861
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:06 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 879
Saad is not going to Columbus again. Been there done that. Torts doesn’t like his disinterest in back checking.
Viqsi liked this.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:07 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 455
Isn't Saad UFA? Jackets are expected to trade their #1 goal of the future (at least part of their tandem) for what could be a rental?
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:09 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Saad is not going to Columbus again. Been there done that. Torts doesn’t like his disinterest in back checking.


Definitely the hardest sell here. I think that he's looked a lot more forecheck heavy in Chicago and worked on a much more physical and fast game. Not saying that it'll inherently be approved, but the trade value in of itself is fair.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:09 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 17,019
Likes: 12,017
If you had Elvis Merzlikins, would you trade him? Of course not
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:09 a.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Quoting: TooMalevolent
Isn't Saad UFA? Jackets are expected to trade their #1 goal of the future (at least part of their tandem) for what could be a rental?


Saad isn't a UFA. And Korpi would be fine too in this trade - just after this playoffs with how insane Korpisalo is playing, I wasn't sure who they were giving up.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:10 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
If you had Elvis Merzlikins, would you trade him? Of course not


Korpisalo works here too, just would take away one of the picks.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:11 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 879
Quoting: crowismydad
Definitely the hardest sell here. I think that he's looked a lot more forecheck heavy in Chicago and worked on a much more physical and fast game. Not saying that it'll inherently be approved, but the trade value in of itself is fair.


Merzlikins is the goaltender that probably has the most upside. It would take something significantly more than Saad to get him out of Columbus.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:14 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 879
Quoting: crowismydad
Korpisalo works here too, just would take away one of the picks.


Either of the goalies in Columbus are going to cost you some significant pieces. Both are very talented and on great contracts. You are going to have to offer something better than that to even come close to what Jarmo would want
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:15 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Merzlikins is the goaltender that probably has the most upside. It would take something significantly more than Saad to get him out of Columbus.


Like said, I would do Korpi too, just would remove one of the picks. I agree that Elvis does have a higher upside, but with limited experience in the league, Saad at 4.5m, a 2nd and a 3rd rounder is a fair trade. I wouldn't have an issue bridge dealing Strome for a few years and trading him instead of Saad with picks for Elvis. The roster can replace the loss of Strome, and Strome has a much much higher upside as a center.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:15 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 455
Quoting: crowismydad
Saad isn't a UFA. And Korpi would be fine too in this trade - just after this playoffs with how insane Korpisalo is playing, I wasn't sure who they were giving up.


I'm saying he is a UFA after the year-pretty much a rental, how do the CBJ know they can keep him. Besides, the value is not close to being fair.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:17 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 879
Quoting: crowismydad
Like said, I would do Korpi too, just would remove one of the picks. I agree that Elvis does have a higher upside, but with limited experience in the league, Saad at 4.5m, a 2nd and a 3rd rounder is a fair trade. I wouldn't have an issue bridge dealing Strome for a few years and trading him instead of Saad with picks for Elvis. The roster can replace the loss of Strome, and Strome has a much much higher upside as a center.


You don’t get what I am saying. The value is nowhere near what it would take to get either goaltender. Their play and contracts make them very valuable. It will cost some serious assets to get either of them. Saad is a no go.
Friendly_Cannon liked this.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:18 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Quoting: TooMalevolent
I'm saying he is a UFA after the year-pretty much a rental, how do the CBJ know they can keep him. Besides, the value is not close to being fair.


Goalie trade values are notoriously low. Columbus has another goalie who can step in, whether the trade is for Elvis or Korpi. Retaining salary for a 4.5m top 6 forward along with a 2nd and third round pick seems a fair trade, especially if you throw in Korpi instead of Elvis.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:21 a.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Quoting: Jacketsman61
You don’t get what I am saying. The value is nowhere near what it would take to get either goaltender. Their play and contracts make them very valuable. It will cost some serious assets to get either of them. Saad is a no go.


With all due respect while Elvis I can understand the skepticism, but Korpisalo has never taken a starters load, his most recent season was below league average in terms of goaltending, and his contract isn't anything exceptionally low at 3m per year. He's having a great playoff - but I think that this trade would easily be fair value for Korpisalo.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:27 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 879
Quoting: crowismydad
With all due respect while Elvis I can understand the skepticism, but Korpisalo has never taken a starters load, his most recent season was below league average in terms of goaltending, and his contract isn't anything exceptionally low at 3m per year. He's having a great playoff - but I think that this trade would easily be fair value for Korpisalo.


He started this season. Early on Columbus was trying to find their way after the exodus of Bread, Dutch, and Bob. It took a couple of months but then Korpi got hot before he got a knee injury. Then Elvis took over and was carrying the load just as well before Korpi came back just prior to the pause. Both goalies are starting material
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:32 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Quoting: Jacketsman61
He started this season. Early on Columbus was trying to find their way after the exodus of Bread, Dutch, and Bob. It took a couple of months but then Korpi got hot before he got a knee injury. Then Elvis took over and was carrying the load just as well before Korpi came back just prior to the pause. Both goalies are starting material


I'm not saying that they both can't start. Hell I'd trade for him AS a starter. But in terms of trade value, even assuming Korpisalo was a starter this year, he still posted a below league average s%. If you look at his #s through his career he only has a single season as a backup where he posted above average #s. Based on goaltending trade history, e.g. prime Luongo going for a few ehh players, Bishop not even a year off a vezina finalist was shipped off for less than this trade, you're far overvaluing goalies.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 3:39 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,400
Likes: 19,597
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Saad is not going to Columbus again. Been there done that. Torts doesn’t like his disinterest in back checking.


This statement confuses me, Saad is an excellent 200 ft player
crowismydad liked this.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 4:09 a.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Aug. 19, 2020 at 4:09 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 879
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
This statement confuses me, Saad is an excellent 200 ft player


Maybe he has gotten better, but I remember distinctly him getting benched by Torts because of his lack of hustle in an OT game against the Kings a few years back. Point is he is not going to Columbus.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 4:11 a.m.
#19
In Connor We Trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 3,315
Likes: 2,080
Quoting: crowismydad


Tbh I like it, but Idk if Jackets will accept
Aug. 19, 2020 at 4:19 a.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Quoting: Beetlejuice
Tbh I like it, but Idk if Jackets will accept


What if we swapped Saad for Strome and didn't sign Fast? We could still make it work and throw up Highmore as ths 13th forward cap wise.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 4:21 a.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Maybe he has gotten better, but I remember distinctly him getting benched by Torts because of his lack of hustle in an OT game against the Kings a few years back. Point is he is not going to Columbus.


As I said to Beetlejuice, what about Strome? Big bodied center with 60+ point potential, who could be locked down for 3 years at 3.5m or so by us then traded to you immediately after.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 4:22 a.m.
#22
In Connor We Trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 3,315
Likes: 2,080
Quoting: crowismydad
What if we swapped Saad for Strome and didn't sign Fast? We could still make it work and throw up Highmore as ths 13th forward cap wise.


I'm not certain about value of Merzlikins, so thats why idk if the Jackets will accept, but I rather go after Georgiev who's will only cost us a second and has the potential to becoming a starter
Aug. 19, 2020 at 4:32 a.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Quoting: Beetlejuice
I'm not certain about value of Merzlikins, so thats why idk if the Jackets will accept, but I rather go after Georgiev who's will only cost us a second and has the potential to becoming a starter


Georgiev may be cheaper for sure, but Elvis gives us the cap space we need. The reason I wanted to deal away Strome/Saad was because of the cap relief! The Jackets have Vehviläinen and Kivlenieks in their prospect system for goalies, both who they believe can be starters, especially Vehviläinen. I figure it's easier for them to replace their backup/1B than NY as well. We need the cap room cleared to keep a competitive bottom 6. If we keep Saad not Strome, we can throw Saad on the first line, drop Caggs to the 3rd, move Chucky to C and let him play C to Suter and Cagguila, or rotate him with Kampf, and on the 4th line we can roll Carpenter with Kampf, etc. and bring Highmore up.
Aug. 19, 2020 at 4:35 a.m.
#24
In Connor We Trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 3,315
Likes: 2,080
Quoting: crowismydad
Georgiev may be cheaper for sure, but Elvis gives us the cap space we need. The reason I wanted to deal away Strome/Saad was because of the cap relief! The Jackets have Vehviläinen and Kivlenieks in their prospect system for goalies, both who they believe can be starters, especially Vehviläinen. I figure it's easier for them to replace their backup/1B than NY as well. We need the cap room cleared to keep a competitive bottom 6. If we keep Saad not Strome, we can throw Saad on the first line, drop Caggs to the 3rd, move Chucky to C and let him play C to Suter and Cagguila, or rotate him with Kampf, and on the 4th line we can roll Carpenter with Kampf, etc. and bring Highmore up.


there still better ways to get rid of Strome and Saad for cap relief
Aug. 19, 2020 at 4:37 a.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Crawford Lover
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 15
Quoting: Beetlejuice
there still better ways to get rid of Strome and Saad for cap relief


What would you recommend?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll