SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Shake

Created by: ItWasIn
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 21, 2020
Published: Aug. 21, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$787,500
3$2,600,000
1$787,500
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$725,000
7$7,000,000
1$700,000
5$5,000,000
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Johansen, Ryan ($750,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Both coming off of down seasons. Monahan brings the goal-hungry Preds a 20-30 goal threat. Johansen is more pass-first, but is superior defensively. He also is a horse in the postseason.

I think both teams are ready to shake up their cores
2.
CGY
  1. Pesce, Brett
Additional Details:
THIS IS UNLIKELY.

This is my best case scenario, I would settle for someone else and it doesn't need to be CAR. I want a RHD with term. CGY and CAR made the big deal 2 offseasons ago, so there's a working relationship. CAR showed they weren't bothered by term disparity in the Hamilton/Ferland acquistions, they gave up way more term in Lindholm/Hanifin.

CAR is completely loaded on D, which is my only sliver of hope for this happening. Of course I'm sure TOR would offer Nylander for Pesce.
This gives the Canes a top 6 of
Teravainen-Aho-Svechnikov
Gaudreau-Trocheck-Necas
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$68,801,666$0$882,500$12,698,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$725,000$725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$787,500$787,500
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
UFA - 4
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$787,500$787,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 21, 2020 at 2:27 p.m.
#26
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 264
Quoting: ecupirate07
dont engage. he is just looking to be a contrarian.


ok, its just i have some obsessive-compulsions & 1 of them is not allowing ppl 2 b wrong or not understand something im explainig (actually im not sure if thats technically an obsessive-compulsion)
Aug. 21, 2020 at 2:54 p.m.
#27
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,511
Likes: 5,026
Quoting: cgy_flame_fan
now ur saying the canes r just an average skating team?, ur saying ur team is worse than they r just 2 prove a point?, u obviously have no loyolty 2 the canes


I'm saying that all teams have top end skaters genius. Even Detroit has Dylan Larkin. When you remember that, Gaudreau is a meh skater. If you say there's 2 better skaters than him on every team in the league, he's still at best 63rd. He's average with his skating.
Aug. 21, 2020 at 3:00 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 264
Quoting: Caniac2000
I'm saying that all teams have top end skaters genius. Even Detroit has Dylan Larkin. When you remember that, Gaudreau is a meh skater. If you say there's 2 better skaters than him on every team in the league, he's still at best 63rd. He's average with his skating.


list 60 better skaters than gaudreau
Aug. 21, 2020 at 3:35 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,511
Likes: 5,026
Quoting: cgy_flame_fan
list 60 better skaters than gaudreau


Uhhh, alright then

Rakell
Lindholm
Hall
Keller
Pastrnak
Kase
Eichel
Dahlin
Necas
Aho
Dubois
Jones
MacKinnon
Landeskog
Strome
DeBrincat
Seguin
Heiskanen
Larkin
Mantha
McDavid
Draisaitl
Barkov
Huberdeau
Kopitar
Moore
Fiala
Dumba (Could have Brodin and Spurgeon)
Tatar
Suzuki
Forsberg
Arvidsson
Palmieri
Hischier
Panarin
Zibanejad
Barzal
Eberle
Chabot
Duclair
Crosby
Malkin
Couturier
Hayes (could have like 10 more)
Tarasenko
O'Rielly
Hertl
Meier
Matthews
Marner
Point
Kucherov
Pettersen
Hughes
Stone
Pacioretty
Hagelin
Oshie
Ehlers
Schiefiele

Notice how I did that 2 by 2 as well, you can go ahead and argue, but I don't know I'd take Gaudreau's skating above a lot of these guys.
Aug. 21, 2020 at 3:35 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 737
Likes: 40
Quoting: ItWasIn
Again it comes down to who they are playing with. Monahan has spent essentially his whole career with an elite LW, NSH doesn’t have that, Josi and Weber are the only elite players that the Preds have.

I can live with less production if you’re “1C” can keep his head above water defensively and handle the tough matchups and doesn’t need to be sheltered


Great post, it's hard to find legitimate Flames talk here. Johansen is the only realistic Monahan trade option I've thought about that doesn't involve a rebuild of sorts, which is never going to happen.
Side note - I'd do that Johnny trade all day for a young top 3 d-man if we can sign Hall or a top line forward to replace him.

My concern would be it ends up being lateral at best. Personally my view is: If you think you can win a cup in the next 2-3 years make the trade. If not you may be preventing yourself from winning one for the 5 years beyond that. I don't believe any move improves the team enough to win in that 2 years.

Why you could do it:
- They are almost equal players (I use a 3 year sample) at even strength, with Monahan a better scorer and Joho a better defender, Monahan scores more because he is a strong PP guy.

- Best reason to do it by far is Joho is a proven playoff performer and I think his injury cost Nashville a cup.

Here's why I wouldn't and probably why I can't see the Flames improving short term in any Monahan trade:
- As mentioned Monahan is a superior scorer in almost every way and he doesn't get any more offensive zone starts than Joho. Better goal scorer, more 1st assists, more high danger chances, etc. The one area Joho is better is zone entries where Gaudreau does most of the puck carrying for the Flames. I'm not sure I buy better linemates for Mony. Forsberg is an elite scorer and Arvidsson is a top High Danger scoring chance player (similar to Monahan). Those 3 had been a top possession line in hockey for 2-3 years and having multiple Norris caliber d-men on the ice is nice (Josi, Ellis, PK/Weber).

- Joho's work ethic is not ideal. It has been a consistent issue dating back to CBJ and is why he is not likely to get any better than he is now. Evolving Hockey's WAR rating shows Joho already beginning to decline for the last 3 years.

- Whereas Monahan is still improving and actively trying to. I.E. his physical/defensive changes this year. He has parts of a solid defensive game like faceoffs, takeaways, and hard backchecking but consistently makes coverage errors in his own end. Debatable whether he can learn that, but he's only 25 and puts the work in so I would say there is a chance and that would elevate him to a place Joho will never get to.

- Monahan's cap number is a huge bonus, particularly these days on top of being 2 years younger. (I don't believe you could get Nash to eat cap on 5 years)

Interested to hear your thoughts on this,
Aug. 21, 2020 at 4:04 p.m.
#31
Thread Starter
CGY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: SmallTownHero14
Great post, it's hard to find legitimate Flames talk here. Johansen is the only realistic Monahan trade option I've thought about that doesn't involve a rebuild of sorts, which is never going to happen.
Side note - I'd do that Johnny trade all day for a young top 3 d-man if we can sign Hall or a top line forward to replace him.

My concern would be it ends up being lateral at best. Personally my view is: If you think you can win a cup in the next 2-3 years make the trade. If not you may be preventing yourself from winning one for the 5 years beyond that. I don't believe any move improves the team enough to win in that 2 years.

Why you could do it:
- They are almost equal players (I use a 3 year sample) at even strength, with Monahan a better scorer and Joho a better defender, Monahan scores more because he is a strong PP guy.

- Best reason to do it by far is Joho is a proven playoff performer and I think his injury cost Nashville a cup.

Here's why I wouldn't and probably why I can't see the Flames improving short term in any Monahan trade:
- As mentioned Monahan is a superior scorer in almost every way and he doesn't get any more offensive zone starts than Joho. Better goal scorer, more 1st assists, more high danger chances, etc. The one area Joho is better is zone entries where Gaudreau does most of the puck carrying for the Flames. I'm not sure I buy better linemates for Mony. Forsberg is an elite scorer and Arvidsson is a top High Danger scoring chance player (similar to Monahan). Those 3 had been a top possession line in hockey for 2-3 years and having multiple Norris caliber d-men on the ice is nice (Josi, Ellis, PK/Weber).

- Joho's work ethic is not ideal. It has been a consistent issue dating back to CBJ and is why he is not likely to get any better than he is now. Evolving Hockey's WAR rating shows Joho already beginning to decline for the last 3 years.

- Whereas Monahan is still improving and actively trying to. I.E. his physical/defensive changes this year. He has parts of a solid defensive game like faceoffs, takeaways, and hard backchecking but consistently makes coverage errors in his own end. Debatable whether he can learn that, but he's only 25 and puts the work in so I would say there is a chance and that would elevate him to a place Joho will never get to.

- Monahan's cap number is a huge bonus, particularly these days on top of being 2 years younger. (I don't believe you could get Nash to eat cap on 5 years)

Interested to hear your thoughts on this,


You'd probably get more from NSH than just Johansen if such a deal was made. Maybe a pick swap, CGY moves up to 11th and NSH down to 19th.

-Both players are pretty solid in the circle, but again, Johansen is the superior defensive player. Again, I can live with less points out of a #1 C if it means he can shoulder the hard minutes and keep that line above water. A Tkachuk-Johansen-Lindholm line could be really solid.

- I know Monahan has actively tried to improve his overall game, I appreciate that. However, it really detracted from his offensive output. He's still got a long ways to go defensively, even if he's trying hard, if he's not producing offence he doesn't do enough for me. Lots will disagree with me, I just prefer Johansen to Monahan as a #1C. I totally agree, if he didn't get hurt NSH wins a cup.

- If Gaudreau gets traded, I think it's possible the Flames get futures. If Monahan is traded I think it would be something like this, just because it creates a really big hole in the lineup. A Gaudreau trade is easier to stomach for futures, because Tkachuk is a top line LW.
Aug. 21, 2020 at 4:15 p.m.
#32
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 737
Likes: 40
Quoting: ItWasIn
You'd probably get more from NSH than just Johansen if such a deal was made. Maybe a pick swap, CGY moves up to 11th and NSH down to 19th.

-Both players are pretty solid in the circle, but again, Johansen is the superior defensive player. Again, I can live with less points out of a #1 C if it means he can shoulder the hard minutes and keep that line above water. A Tkachuk-Johansen-Lindholm line could be really solid.

- I know Monahan has actively tried to improve his overall game, I appreciate that. However, it really detracted from his offensive output. He's still got a long ways to go defensively, even if he's trying hard, if he's not producing offence he doesn't do enough for me. Lots will disagree with me, I just prefer Johansen to Monahan as a #1C. I totally agree, if he didn't get hurt NSH wins a cup.

- If Gaudreau gets traded, I think it's possible the Flames get futures. If Monahan is traded I think it would be something like this, just because it creates a really big hole in the lineup. A Gaudreau trade is easier to stomach for futures, because Tkachuk is a top line LW.


Completely agree on Gaudreau, so much easier to replace a winger. Fair points on Johansen, I'm sure many would be split, I prefer Monahan and the possible improvement but yeah year 1 of defensive improvement came at a steep cost offensively.

I would have liked a Gaudreau trade with Philly for one of Konecny or Farabee but I think that time has come and gone with in the last year or 2.
Aug. 21, 2020 at 4:18 p.m.
#33
Thread Starter
CGY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 2,064
Quoting: SmallTownHero14
Completely agree on Gaudreau, so much easier to replace a winger. Fair points on Johansen, I'm sure many would be split, I prefer Monahan and the possible improvement but yeah year 1 of defensive improvement came at a steep cost offensively.

I would have liked a Gaudreau trade with Philly for one of Konecny or Farabee but I think that time has come and gone with in the last year or 2.


I don't see PHI as a great fit for Gaudreau. I'd love to trade him for Konecny, but it's probably not realistic. A year ago I'm sure it could have been done. I still think you could get Farabee though if you're the Flames and you look at PHI as a good partner
Aug. 21, 2020 at 4:36 p.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 737
Likes: 40
Quoting: ItWasIn
I don't see PHI as a great fit for Gaudreau. I'd love to trade him for Konecny, but it's probably not realistic. A year ago I'm sure it could have been done. I still think you could get Farabee though if you're the Flames and you look at PHI as a good partner


Ya they aren't now and maybe that wasn't/isn't their style. Their top 6 is set now, had to be before they signed JVR and then became a top team this year. I'd take that deal in a second though if I could get Farabee and maybe a little more.
Aug. 21, 2020 at 4:39 p.m.
#35
Lets Go Blues
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,774
Likes: 4,332
Quoting: Caniac2000
Uhhh, alright then

Rakell
Lindholm
Hall
Keller
Pastrnak
Kase
Eichel
Dahlin
Necas
Aho
Dubois
Jones
MacKinnon
Landeskog
Strome
DeBrincat
Seguin
Heiskanen
Larkin
Mantha
McDavid
Draisaitl
Barkov
Huberdeau
Kopitar
Moore
Fiala
Dumba (Could have Brodin and Spurgeon)
Tatar
Suzuki
Forsberg
Arvidsson
Palmieri
Hischier
Panarin
Zibanejad
Barzal
Eberle
Chabot
Duclair
Crosby
Malkin
Couturier
Hayes (could have like 10 more)
Tarasenko
O'Rielly
Hertl
Meier
Matthews
Marner
Point
Kucherov
Pettersen
Hughes
Stone
Pacioretty
Hagelin
Oshie
Ehlers
Schiefiele

Notice how I did that 2 by 2 as well, you can go ahead and argue, but I don't know I'd take Gaudreau's skating above a lot of these guys.


You have some guys on here who are well below average skaters. Strome, ROR, Couturier, Hayes, Oshie, Kopitar. They don't rely on speed/edgework like Johnny does. You're just out here getting people worked up. Guessing a "you don't watch hockey" comment is coming here soon.
KINGS67 and ItWasIn liked this.
Aug. 21, 2020 at 4:57 p.m.
#36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 3,649
Likes: 1,620
Quoting: A_K
You have some guys on here who are well below average skaters. Strome, ROR, Couturier, Hayes, Oshie, Kopitar. They don't rely on speed/edgework like Johnny does. You're just out here getting people worked up. Guessing a "you don't watch hockey" comment is coming here soon.


I found it funny that he included kopitar and Hayes as well, like WHAT?! Gaudreau can skate. Might not be the best, not sure what this guys point is. Also Not sure why he tries to pick a fight almost everyday on this site.
A_K and BuFfaLOFaN liked this.
Aug. 22, 2020 at 7:13 a.m.
#37
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 19,511
Likes: 5,026
Quoting: A_K
You have some guys on here who are well below average skaters. Strome, ROR, Couturier, Hayes, Oshie, Kopitar. They don't rely on speed/edgework like Johnny does. You're just out here getting people worked up. Guessing a "you don't watch hockey" comment is coming here soon.


Strome, ROR, Couturier, and Oshie are 100% better. Kopitar, when he's fully healthy, is, When Kopitar is healthy, I personally have him as a top 15ish skater. Hayes might have been a stretch, I was trying to go 2 by 2 and couldn't think of another player from PHiladelphia. Maybe Provorov or Sanheim would have been better, my point still stands. Gaudreau is an okay skater. Not great, not bad.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll