SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If teams stopped being cowards and used the offer sheet

Created by: Chigurrhh
Team: 2020-21 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 31, 2020
Published: Aug. 31, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Just using these teams as examples.


Point is that Tampa has a ton of NTC and NMC which make making cap space difficult. Teams really should be jumping all over these players.

For Sergachev, tampa may be looking at a bridge deal like the ones that McAvoy and Werenski got ~5 million per year. A higher offer could be compelling, especially because it gives Sergachev that chance to cash in big on his next contract.

Cirelli is already really good and is going to be a Selke guy. Why not just offer him a ton of money for a bigger role? A team like Minnesota desperately needs a C to build around their young wingers. A first, second, and third round picks is a pretty low cost.
Trades
1.
TBL
  1. 2021 1st round pick (WPG)
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (WPG)
WPG
  1. Sergachev, Mikhail [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Offer sheet of $6.3 million x3. A bridge deal with a higher cap hit than what Werenski and McAvoy got.
2.
TBL
  1. 2021 1st round pick (MIN)
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (MIN)
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (MIN)
MIN
  1. Cirelli, Anthony [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Offer sheet of 7x$7.5 million
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TBL
2021
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NJD
2022
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
16$81,500,000$77,091,666$0$500,000$4,408,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,800,000$1,800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,166,666$5,166,666
C, LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,650,000$1,650,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
G
UFA - 8
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,300,000$1,300,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:06 p.m.
#1
MisstheWhalers
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 23,648
Likes: 12,370
They have to want to sign the offersheet though.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:07 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
They have to want to sign the offersheet though.


No ****.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:12 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,210
How is that being a coward? Just because teams know the offersheets will get matched, or they will have to give a boat load of picks for one guy. I wouldn’t offersheet.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:12 p.m.
#4
MNBassman
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 3,571
Cernak too.
Chigurrhh liked this.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:14 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 317
I know Hockey has a stigma against it. i think its a great tool to not only possibly get a player worth more than the picks and if not to put a rival in a bigger cap crunch.

Sergachev, Cernak and Cirelli are all open to a open sheet. You can offer a double offer sheet to Sergachev and Cernak one for $2,113,717 - $4,227,437 2nd and the other for between $4,227,438 - $6,341,152 1st and 3rd.

Would you not give up the 3 picks for both these guys? Tampa can not match both so you are almost guaranteed to get at least 1 and push Tampa closer to the cap.
Chigurrhh liked this.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:16 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
How is that being a coward? Just because teams know the offersheets will get matched, or they will have to give a boat load of picks for one guy. I wouldn’t offersheet.


Teams give up boat loads of picks for players all the time.

See: Pageau, Kapanen, Zucker, Coleman, etc. Teams throw around assets to get those guys. These guys are young and with their best years ahead of them.

It would take more than a 1st and a 3rd to get a player like Sergachev in a trade. It's a market inefficiency that teams aren't using because it makes their peers angry and want to fight them in a barn (see Burke, Brian).

In a case like Tampa, they are stuck with multiple great RFAs, little cap room, and little roster flexibility . Teams don't take advantage of that.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:18 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,210
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Teams give up boat loads of picks for players all the time.

See: Pageau, Kapanen, Zucker, Coleman, etc. Teams throw around assets to get those guys. These guys are young and with their best years ahead of them.

It would take more than a 1st and a 3rd to get a player like Sergachev in a trade. It's a market inefficiency that teams are using because it makes their peers angry and want to fight them in a barn (see Burke, Bryan).

In a case like Tampa, they are stuck with multiple great RFAs, little cap room, and little roster flexibility . Teams don't take advantage of that.


Eh. You have to overpay to get the players to accept the offersheets you know. It’s not as easy as you think. Also a team gets like 7 days to either match it or take the picks. They would most likely get matched no matter what.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:21 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Eh. You have to overpay to get the players to accept the offersheets you know. It’s not as easy as you think. Also a team gets like 7 days to either match it or take the picks. They would most likely get matched no matter what.


Cool, force them to make that decision. In this case, Tampa likely would have to choose between keeping it's players due to their situation with NTCs and limited cap space.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:23 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 406
Likes: 429
Because if you recall how the Dustin Penner signing went in 2007, it creates rifts in working relationships amongst GMs. You weaken or even lose trade partners in other teams, or even worse yet you run the risk of having your own RFAs targeted down the line. It’s just not something very many GMs have the guts to risk.
justaBoss liked this.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:24 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,210
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Cool, force them to make that decision. In this case, Tampa likely would have to choose between keeping it's players due to their situation with NTCs and limited cap space.


Tampa would still match, or the player may not want to go to your team.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:31 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 317
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
Eh. You have to overpay to get the players to accept the offersheets you know. It’s not as easy as you think. Also a team gets like 7 days to either match it or take the picks. They would most likely get matched no matter what.


You don't have to overpay. Below are a few reasons why they should be used more.

Say Montreal has some cap space and in need of a D. your Picks are mid round so not that bad.

Player A is worth $4M a year. He has no arbitration rights and ends up signing with Tampa for say $3M year.

You could offer him $4M a year knowing that Tampa could very well match the offer sheet and just took away $1M from a rival club in your division.

If they don't match you just got a young player worth $4M for only a 2nd round pick. (worth more that the pick)

What is the harm either way?
Shanesaw9 liked this.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:33 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,990
Likes: 4,210
Quoting: kous
You don't have to overpay. Below are a few reasons why they should be used more.

Say Montreal has some cap space and in need of a D. your Picks are mid round so not that bad.

Player A is worth $4M a year. He has no arbitration rights and ends up signing with Tampa for say $3M year.

You could offer him $4M a year knowing that Tampa could very well match the offer sheet and just took away $1M from a rival club in your division.

If they don't match you just got a young player worth $4M for only a 2nd round pick. (worth more that the pick)

What is the harm either way?


I don’t like it, and plus you do have to overpay. If you want the player to want to play for you instead of the team that owns his rights.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:35 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 3,641
The Wild fired the GM that had the balls to make an OS in Fenton. I don't think Guerin will.

I do think there are more offer sheets handed out that get publicized. The players/agents then use them as a bargaining chip to get a better contract with their current team.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:37 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 317
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
I don’t like it, and plus you do have to overpay. If you want the player to want to play for you instead of the team that owns his rights.


What is there not to like? this is a business you should be doing everything you can to position your team over the others.

If you read the double offer sheet I posted above to Sergachev and Cernak you don;t need to over pay and Tampa would not be able to match both players without gutting their forwards. And If a 3rd team came in and offered sheeted Cirelli its game over for Tampa.
Shanesaw9 liked this.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:38 p.m.
#15
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
Btw 7x7,5 offer sheet will cost you 2 firsts, a 2nd and a 3rd...

Steep price to pay for Cirelli.
Shanesaw9 liked this.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:39 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
players have to want to sign offersheets, so you know just ignoring that fact
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:40 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 317
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
I don’t like it, and plus you do have to overpay. If you want the player to want to play for you instead of the team that owns his rights.


look at the Aho offer sheet You don't need to overpay
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:40 p.m.
#18
Hockey Fan13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,919
Likes: 2,489
Quoting: MNBassman
Cernak too.


I say Wild should OS Cirelli if Tampa matches then OS Cernak and Sergachev for spite.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:41 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 317
Quoting: coga16
players have to want to sign offersheets, so you know just ignoring that fact


Just like UFAs have to want to leave happens all the time These are kids just coming off their lowest NHL contract with little leverage other than an OS. Why would you not watch to sign one?
Shanesaw9 liked this.
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:44 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Quoting: kous
Just like UFAs have to want to leave happens all the time These are kids just coming off their lowest NHL contract with little leverage other than an OS. Why would you not watch to sign one?


bc in this case wit Tampa, they are a juggernaut of a team in a tax free state, not all players are money driven. Some actually....shocking concept....want to win. Just like Point who said he wouldnt even entertain an offersheet bc he wanted to win with group wiht Tampa, that seems to be their mentality. You will see shorter deals for lower aavs so they can have more kicks at the can at winning
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:50 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 317
Quoting: coga16
bc in this case wit Tampa, they are a juggernaut of a team in a tax free state, not all players are money driven. Some actually....shocking concept....want to win. Just like Point who said he wouldnt even entertain an offersheet bc he wanted to win with group wiht Tampa, that seems to be their mentality. You will see shorter deals for lower aavs so they can have more kicks at the can at winning


Not everyone is like that. Some want more money, Some want more playing time, Some want to play in a hockey market, Some want security of a long team deal, Some want to play closer to home. At the end of the day this is a business. and everyone needs are different

Tampa has not won anything and their time is closing. This team downhill from here
Aug. 31, 2020 at 9:58 p.m.
#22
I post sometimes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,732
Likes: 1,671
Quoting: GabeVilardiFanAccount
Because if you recall how the Dustin Penner signing went in 2007, it creates rifts in working relationships amongst GMs. You weaken or even lose trade partners in other teams, or even worse yet you run the risk of having your own RFAs targeted down the line. It’s just not something very many GMs have the guts to risk.


Marc Bergevin is licking his lips as we speak
Aug. 31, 2020 at 10:02 p.m.
#23
I post sometimes
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 5,732
Likes: 1,671
Quoting: coga16
bc in this case wit Tampa, they are a juggernaut of a team in a tax free state, not all players are money driven. Some actually....shocking concept....want to win. Just like Point who said he wouldnt even entertain an offersheet bc he wanted to win with group wiht Tampa, that seems to be their mentality. You will see shorter deals for lower aavs so they can have more kicks at the can at winning



It's a no state Tax thing, they still get taxes at the federal level - like a base 20% I think, vs 49% in Quebec (its the highest bracket over 200K I think)
Aug. 31, 2020 at 10:07 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: GabeVilardiFanAccount
Because if you recall how the Dustin Penner signing went in 2007, it creates rifts in working relationships amongst GMs. You weaken or even lose trade partners in other teams, or even worse yet you run the risk of having your own RFAs targeted down the line. It’s just not something very many GMs have the guts to risk.


Cowards
Aug. 31, 2020 at 10:09 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: justaBoss
Btw 7x7,5 offer sheet will cost you 2 firsts, a 2nd and a 3rd...

Steep price to pay for Cirelli.


Not really. If the team has no C to build around and view him as a number 1 moving forward, it's a pretty reasonable price.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll