SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Goalie next year

Created by: JTrades
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 7, 2020
Published: Sep. 7, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
If the leafs trade Andersen how comfortable are you with Campbell? Personally I'd like to see the leafs go with a tandem next year instead of a big name UFA. All the teams left in the playoffs except Tampa have used two goalies

The trades are just some thoughts. go ahead, let me know that my value is way off on both sides :)
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,500,000
1$800,000
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$750,000
3$2,000,000
3$1,650,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. 2020 1st round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Hutton, Carter
  2. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  3. 2020 4th round pick (BUF)
  4. 2020 5th round pick (BUF)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$80,827,283$0$0$672,717
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$750,000$750,000
LW, C
UFA
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 7, 2020 at 8:45 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 696
Hutton 😂

Ristolainen 😭😭😭

Stop with these, I’m going to die 🤣
Saskleaf liked this.
Sep. 7, 2020 at 9:03 a.m.
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,473
Likes: 22,654
I don't. mind the the concept of the trades. One trouble with Risto is his 5.4m cap hit into 21/22 leaving the Leafs with little cap room.
Sep. 7, 2020 at 9:25 a.m.
#3
Go leafs go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,232
Likes: 9,186
Bud. Hutton is worse than Campbell. He has some sort of eye problem I think. And Risto is worse than Barrie. You will cry for Barrie to come back.
Sep. 7, 2020 at 10:49 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 353
Quoting: Saskleaf
Bud. Hutton is worse than Campbell. He has some sort of eye problem I think. And Risto is worse than Barrie. You will cry for Barrie to come back.


That's why he is 1B offensively yes but he can't be worse on D
Sep. 7, 2020 at 2:23 p.m.
#5
Go leafs go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,232
Likes: 9,186
Quoting: JTrades
That's why he is 1B offensively yes but he can't be worse on D


I don't know. Apparently he is.
Sep. 8, 2020 at 10:39 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 4,798
Quoting: MMXD
Hutton 😂

Ristolainen 😭😭😭

Stop with these, I’m going to die 🤣


Quoting: palhal
I don't. mind the the concept of the trades. One trouble with Risto is his 5.4m cap hit into 21/22 leaving the Leafs with little cap room.


Quoting: JTrades
That's why he is 1B offensively yes but he can't be worse on D


Quoting: Saskleaf
I don't know. Apparently he is.


No Sabre AGM commented, so I will be the first.
First:
While many doubt this Ristolainen is Buffalo top defenseman.
Many may laugh and say so what, the whole defense sucks.
Well this defense that is suppose to suck gave up fewer 5 on 5 goals than all but 8 NHL teams last year.
They did this with a blind GK and an offense that could not keep the puck out of the defensive zone.

Second:
Please stop sending Johnsson to Buffalo.
Buffalo has Skinner, Olofsson, Johansson and Girgensons all had more goals than Johansson, why would Buffalo need a fifth LW.

Third:
Hutton has no trade value now.
To start the season he set a Sabre record for the most saves to record a shut out.
Then he went blind and could not see the puck and lost 12 games in a row while recording a +4.00 GA %
So yes he has negative value.

Fourth:
Kerfoot has 113 points over the last 3 seasons while Ristolainen has 117.
Ristolainen is a top pairing defenseman (on a team that did well to stop 5 on 5 goals). Kerfoot is a #3 Center.
Kerfoot does not KP, and gets very limited PP time (even the not needed Johansson got nearly double the PP time he)
I would not trade Ristolainen one for one for Kerfoot, I would need more coming back and that is not Johansson.

So Leaf fans can bemoan that this not a fair trade for them, it does nothing for Buffalo.
Johansson would be our fifth LW, in case that does not sink in, that means press box.
Kerfoot would be the Sabres 3rd center when Buffalo needs a #2 Center.
Then I need to add draft picks for players (who have value) that do not fill needs for Buffalo.
This is a very easy pass for Buffalo.

There that is my rant of the day, Stay tuned tomorrow for my next one. laugh
Saskleaf liked this.
Sep. 8, 2020 at 12:26 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 696
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
No Sabre AGM commented, so I will be the first.
First:
While many doubt this Ristolainen is Buffalo top defenseman.
Many may laugh and say so what, the whole defense sucks.
Well this defense that is suppose to suck gave up fewer 5 on 5 goals than all but 8 NHL teams last year.
They did this with a blind GK and an offense that could not keep the puck out of the defensive zone.

Second:
Please stop sending Johnsson to Buffalo.
Buffalo has Skinner, Olofsson, Johansson and Girgensons all had more goals than Johansson, why would Buffalo need a fifth LW.

Third:
Hutton has no trade value now.
To start the season he set a Sabre record for the most saves to record a shut out.
Then he went blind and could not see the puck and lost 12 games in a row while recording a +4.00 GA %
So yes he has negative value.

Fourth:
Kerfoot has 113 points over the last 3 seasons while Ristolainen has 117.
Ristolainen is a top pairing defenseman (on a team that did well to stop 5 on 5 goals). Kerfoot is a #3 Center.
Kerfoot does not KP, and gets very limited PP time (even the not needed Johansson got nearly double the PP time he)
I would not trade Ristolainen one for one for Kerfoot, I would need more coming back and that is not Johansson.

So Leaf fans can bemoan that this not a fair trade for them, it does nothing for Buffalo.
Johansson would be our fifth LW, in case that does not sink in, that means press box.
Kerfoot would be the Sabres 3rd center when Buffalo needs a #2 Center.
Then I need to add draft picks for players (who have value) that do not fill needs for Buffalo.
This is a very easy pass for Buffalo.

There that is my rant of the day, Stay tuned tomorrow for my next one. laugh


Ristolainen is an offensive defenseman, last thing they want
Sep. 11, 2020 at 9:31 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 353
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
No Sabre AGM commented, so I will be the first.
First:
While many doubt this Ristolainen is Buffalo top defenseman.
Many may laugh and say so what, the whole defense sucks.
Well this defense that is suppose to suck gave up fewer 5 on 5 goals than all but 8 NHL teams last year.
They did this with a blind GK and an offense that could not keep the puck out of the defensive zone.

Second:
Please stop sending Johnsson to Buffalo.
Buffalo has Skinner, Olofsson, Johansson and Girgensons all had more goals than Johansson, why would Buffalo need a fifth LW.

Third:
Hutton has no trade value now.
To start the season he set a Sabre record for the most saves to record a shut out.
Then he went blind and could not see the puck and lost 12 games in a row while recording a +4.00 GA %
So yes he has negative value.

Fourth:
Kerfoot has 113 points over the last 3 seasons while Ristolainen has 117.
Ristolainen is a top pairing defenseman (on a team that did well to stop 5 on 5 goals). Kerfoot is a #3 Center.
Kerfoot does not KP, and gets very limited PP time (even the not needed Johansson got nearly double the PP time he)
I would not trade Ristolainen one for one for Kerfoot, I would need more coming back and that is not Johansson.

So Leaf fans can bemoan that this not a fair trade for them, it does nothing for Buffalo.
Johansson would be our fifth LW, in case that does not sink in, that means press box.
Kerfoot would be the Sabres 3rd center when Buffalo needs a #2 Center.
Then I need to add draft picks for players (who have value) that do not fill needs for Buffalo.
This is a very easy pass for Buffalo.

There that is my rant of the day, Stay tuned tomorrow for my next one. laugh



Thanks for the well thought out response! In my mind resto needs a change of senior but can still be a very good defence man. He is a bit of a risk though. I think Kerfoot is worth less because he is a forward. I think Johnsson is not a need for Buffalo but they did trade for Frolik. As a non Sabers fan it seems like they need more forwards. I truly think Johnsson would be an upgrade for Buffalo but not their biggest need. I didn't know about the eye think for Hutton or his current health but to me he seems like is has negative value but could bounce back, health reasons aside. My thinking was because of this a 2 for 2 trade with similar money going each way might make sense
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll