SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keeping Pietrangelo After Allen Trade and Tarasenko Injury

Created by: dp6154
Team: 2020-21 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 8, 2020
Published: Sep. 8, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Keeping Pietreangelo,
This is a fresh look after the Allen trade also knowing Tarasenko's health. Also obviously the Blues will get Tarasenko hopefully back as some sort of somewhat impactful player the end of next year but that is no guarantee and they won fine without him so they won't dump like a first on it but they will be looking for a young, cheap offensive talent. I think Dube fits well there in a team that would be interested in one of Gunnarsson or Bortuzzo and the Blues would be happy to give up a 3rd there. I'm sure Calgary is somewhat high on him but I think for a D upgrade and ta 3rd they let that little window in 2-3 years take a dip for improvement now and possibly in 3-5 years

The Tarasenko trade to Ottawa for nothing and signing of a made up tarasenko for 1 year at half the cost is a stand in for LTIR and you should mentally apply his 7.5M in future years and not think I'm handing Tarasenko to Ottawa and making a guy up (I know but how many people don't read these descriptions)
Also I know the Blues don't get a 4th scratch, that's again to facilitate the second half of the season Tarasenko Salary after LTIR
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
2$800,000
1$750,000
1$900,000
1$2,490,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$8,750,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Tarasenko, Vladimr
1$3,750,000
Steen, Alexander
1$750,000
Trades
1.
STL
OTT
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir
Additional Details:
a buyout leaves too much money to do this, but I think Tarasenko is on LTIR for about half the season so a created Tarasenko signed for 1 year 3.75M is a stand in for the LTIR and this trade is a dump of that
2.
STL
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
allows Tornto to move on of the pricier LDs
TOR
  1. Bortuzzo, Robert
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (WSH)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CHI
2021
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2022
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$76,178,015$306,349$425,000$5,321,985

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,350,000$5,350,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$758,333$758,333
RW
UFA - 1
Steen, Alexander
$750,000$750,000
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,475,000$1,475,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$8,750,000$8,750,000
RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$4,400,000$4,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$3,275,000$3,275,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$2,490,000$2,490,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$787,500$787,500
LD
UFA - 2
Tarasenko, Vladimr
$3,750,000$3,750,000
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 8, 2020 at 12:35 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
Calgary is not trading Dube at all, and has no interest in trading for what would be their 6LD
ElPhantasmo liked this.
Sep. 8, 2020 at 12:35 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 107
Likes: 18
Quoting: Alfie11
Calgary is not trading Dube at all, and has no interest in trading for what would be their 6LD


Beat me to it.
Sep. 8, 2020 at 12:39 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 279
Likes: 112
I did a "Tarasenko to LTIR" interactive GM team with a stupid long explanation. I don't think anything more complicated needs to happen than Tarasenko just going on LTIR. If I'm correct in my understanding, the Blues could exceed the cap by that number.

There's no question Tank will start next season (whenever that is) on LTIR. The $7.5 million AAV question is when he'll be ready to get back on the ice. In bluntly short terms I advocated for assuming he's LTIR the whole year and if he's not then it's a pleasant surprise and you figure the cap implications then. But you approach the offseason with the belief you will have his full cap hit as cap relief. Considering this is his 3rd surgery on that shoulder in a 18 month timeframe I don't think that stance is as aggressive as some people who disagree with me would claim.
BadTradePolice and dp6154 liked this.
Sep. 8, 2020 at 12:54 p.m.
#4
LOCKEMUP
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 557
Likes: 228
Quoting: Blueman96
I did a "Tarasenko to LTIR" interactive GM team with a stupid long explanation. I don't think anything more complicated needs to happen than Tarasenko just going on LTIR. If I'm correct in my understanding, the Blues could exceed the cap by that number.

There's no question Tank will start next season (whenever that is) on LTIR. The $7.5 million AAV question is when he'll be ready to get back on the ice. In bluntly short terms I advocated for assuming he's LTIR the whole year and if he's not then it's a pleasant surprise and you figure the cap implications then. But you approach the offseason with the belief you will have his full cap hit as cap relief. Considering this is his 3rd surgery on that shoulder in a 18 month timeframe I don't think that stance is as aggressive as some people who disagree with me would claim.


i mean theyll actually have to move someone if he does comes off it later during the season, but either way him going on LTIR buys them so much time and gives them way more flexibility
dp6154 liked this.
Sep. 8, 2020 at 1:03 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 279
Likes: 112
Quoting: yeeeeeeeeeetttt
i mean theyll actually have to move someone if he does comes off it later during the season, but either way him going on LTIR buys them so much time and gives them way more flexibility


With Petro at $9, Dunn at $3.5, and having moved ONLY Jake Allen, with a healthy scratch forward and D-man the Blues would have to clear a hair over $5 million AAV to re-add Tank to the lineup.

No question they'd have to move someone(s). Not ideal, not great. Not impossible. But like I say, that may legitimately never happen and it gives the Blues immediate flexibility and like you say: time. Now the obvious downside would be if Tank is ready and wants to come back you're reliant on a team making a trade with you knowing you HAVE to clear space, so the price would be high.
BadTradePolice liked this.
Sep. 8, 2020 at 1:07 p.m.
#6
LOCKEMUP
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 557
Likes: 228
Quoting: Blueman96
With Petro at $9, Dunn at $3.5, and having moved ONLY Jake Allen, with a healthy scratch forward and D-man the Blues would have to clear a hair over $5 million AAV to re-add Tank to the lineup.

No question they'd have to move someone(s). Not ideal, not great. Not impossible. But like I say, that may legitimately never happen and it gives the Blues immediate flexibility and like you say: time. Now the obvious downside would be if Tank is ready and wants to come back you're reliant on a team making a trade with you knowing you HAVE to clear space, so the price would be high.


i do think they have suitors for guys like bozak though especially once they get into season and some competitive teams find out their 3c spot is weak.
Blueman96 liked this.
Sep. 8, 2020 at 1:15 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 279
Likes: 112
Quoting: yeeeeeeeeeetttt
i do think they have suitors for guys like bozak though especially once they get into season and some competitive teams find out their 3c spot is weak.


Yup! Just takes a single team with a key injury at a spot they need help and then a deal gets done. I'm not saying it'll be easy! But it's a plan anyway. And then you don't lost Petro and sit there staring at Tank on LTIR all year (maybe) from complications, and have an extra $5 million in cap space... etc etc
dp6154 liked this.
Sep. 8, 2020 at 1:17 p.m.
#8
LOCKEMUP
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 557
Likes: 228
Quoting: Blueman96
Yup! Just takes a single team with a key injury at a spot they need help and then a deal gets done. I'm not saying it'll be easy! But it's a plan anyway. And then you don't lost Petro and sit there staring at Tank on LTIR all year (maybe) from complications, and have an extra $5 million in cap space... etc etc


exactly, and even then i think the blues would just pony up and move a third along with bozak before they really consider trading CP
dp6154 liked this.
Sep. 8, 2020 at 2:31 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
dp6154
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 213
Likes: 46
Quoting: Alfie11
Calgary is not trading Dube at all, and has no interest in trading for what would be their 6LD


they're no doubt bringing back Forbort and Gustafsson and you think Gunnarsson is worse than both + Hanifin + Kylington ?! (he's probably better than every LD on that roster save obviously Giordano).

That said not interested in losing Dube is fair. I thought it was a fair value and good fit but I don't know every FOs believe in their own respective prospects and even if fans usually waaaaaaay overrate their own prospects or own Gms love of them, it is a thing and other teams fans are going to be the best source of info
So, thank you for the feedback
Sep. 8, 2020 at 2:34 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
dp6154
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 213
Likes: 46
Quoting: Blueman96
I did a "Tarasenko to LTIR" interactive GM team with a stupid long explanation. I don't think anything more complicated needs to happen than Tarasenko just going on LTIR. If I'm correct in my understanding, the Blues could exceed the cap by that number.

There's no question Tank will start next season (whenever that is) on LTIR. The $7.5 million AAV question is when he'll be ready to get back on the ice. In bluntly short terms I advocated for assuming he's LTIR the whole year and if he's not then it's a pleasant surprise and you figure the cap implications then. But you approach the offseason with the belief you will have his full cap hit as cap relief. Considering this is his 3rd surgery on that shoulder in a 18 month timeframe I don't think that stance is as aggressive as some people who disagree with me would claim.


yeah that was the main part of this though finding a young offensive forward for a team that wants a D was a big deal too and that's an open question. I know Tarasenko is estimated out until at least the end of March and with the season next year starting in dEcember or January and trying to be completed including playoffs by august I assumed end of June/mid July so it was at least half the season on LTIR, and everything after that is either cap gravy or hopefully good again (obviously won't be THAT kind of good agan) Tarasenko
Sep. 8, 2020 at 2:38 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
Quoting: dp6154
they're no doubt bringing back Forbort and Gustafsson and you think Gunnarsson is worse than both + Hanifin + Kylington ?! (he's probably better than every LD on that roster save obviously Giordano).

That said not interested in losing Dube is fair. I thought it was a fair value and good fit but I don't know every FOs believe in their own respective prospects and even if fans usually waaaaaaay overrate their own prospects or own Gms love of them, it is a thing and other teams fans are going to be the best source of info
So, thank you for the feedback

I don’t think Gunnarsson is better than Gio, Hanifin, or Valimaki is right now, and while he might be better than Kylington or Mackey, they’re younger, cheaper, more promising, and don’t require assets to acquire since one’s an RFA and the other is signed already. I doubt we bring back Forbort, and if we bring back Gus it’ll be to play 3RD/PP1 in a limited role that makes full use of his offensive capabilities so there isn’t a conflict there but that’s kinda beside the point. Regarding Dube, he’s proven he’s a more than capable 3rd liner and with his speed and skill he projects to break into the top 6 soon. We don’t have very many young forwards that project as top 6 players so we can’t afford to trade the ones we do have for aging rentals
Sep. 8, 2020 at 2:53 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
dp6154
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 213
Likes: 46
Quoting: Alfie11
I don’t think Gunnarsson is better than Gio, Hanifin, or Valimaki is right now, and while he might be better than Kylington or Mackey, they’re younger, cheaper, more promising, and don’t require assets to acquire since one’s an RFA and the other is signed already. I doubt we bring back Forbort, and if we bring back Gus it’ll be to play 3RD/PP1 in a limited role that makes full use of his offensive capabilities so there isn’t a conflict there but that’s kinda beside the point. Regarding Dube, he’s proven he’s a more than capable 3rd liner and with his speed and skill he projects to break into the top 6 soon. We don’t have very many young forwards that project as top 6 players so we can’t afford to trade the ones we do have for aging rentals


ok well I strongly disagree on the value of Gunnarsson but I do appreciate the feedback and I have edited looking at Toronto because I didn't realize that Dube was that highly thought of in the org. Thank you
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll