SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trouba + Deadline

Created by: LeafsFan
Team: 2016-17 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 26, 2016
Published: Sep. 26, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,000,000
Trades
1.
MIN
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi
  2. 2017 2nd round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
    Rights to RFA Jacob Trouba
    3.
    TOR
    1. 2017 3rd round pick (STL)
    4.
    TOR
    1. Fehr, Eric
    2. 2017 4th round pick (PIT)
    5.
    TOR
    1. 2017 2nd round pick (MIN)
    2. 2017 7th round pick (BUF)
    6.
    TOR
    1. Oleksiak, Jamie
    2. 2017 6th round pick (DAL)
    Additional Details:
    Pick conditional on Oleksiak not being selected in the expansion draft, if he is then TOR gets the pick
    DAL
    1. Michalek, Milan ($2,000,000 retained)
    7.
    TOR
    1. Dal Colle, Michael
    2. Grabovski, Mikhail
    3. 2018 6th round pick (NYI)
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2017
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the MIN
    Logo of the STL
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the DAL
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the BUF
    2018
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the NYI
    Logo of the TOR
    2019
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$73,000,000$57,154,916$512,000$5,790,000$15,845,084
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    C
    UFA - 6
    $900,000$900,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
    C
    UFA - 3
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RW
    UFA - 2
    $612,500$612,500
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    $4,200,000$4,200,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 4
    $2,950,000$2,950,000
    RW, LW, C
    UFA - 2
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RW
    UFA - 3
    $653,333$653,333 (Performance Bonus$207,500$208K)
    LW
    UFA - 1
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    $736,666$736,666 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 6
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    UFA - 5
    $4,050,000$4,050,000
    LD
    UFA - 3
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    UFA - 1
    $750,000$750,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    $918,750$918,750
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    $750,000$750,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    $600,000$600,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    $5,300,000$5,300,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 11:37 a.m.
    #1
    leafs1967again
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 1,626
    Likes: 21
    You and I are really off on our values.

    Kap+2nd does not give you a sniff of Brodin.

    STL wants nothing to do with Polak. He has been exposed the past 6 months.

    Fehr > Holland (which is why they just resigned him for that $$$)

    Hunwick alove does not get you better than a 4th and Greening has zero (as in negative) value still.

    DAL will keep Oleksiak instead of a zero value player even with 50% retention. In what world does a cap dump get you a young d man?

    NYI will not be moving their elite high end prospect for Fehr, even with a cap dump.

    Really bad thread IMO. Really really bad
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 12:03 p.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2015
    Posts: 1,565
    Likes: 89
    Quoting: leafs1967again
    You and I are really off on our values.

    Kap+2nd does not give you a sniff of Brodin.

    STL wants nothing to do with Polak. He has been exposed the past 6 months.

    Fehr > Holland (which is why they just resigned him for that $$$)

    Hunwick alove does not get you better than a 4th and Greening has zero (as in negative) value still.

    DAL will keep Oleksiak instead of a zero value player even with 50% retention. In what world does a cap dump get you a young d man?

    NYI will not be moving their elite high end prospect for Fehr, even with a cap dump.

    Really bad thread IMO. Really really bad


    Although Brodin had early success he really struggled last season (http://www.tsn.ca/off-season-game-plan-minnesota-wild-1.496822) I think you're right I should add some more

    This is my Polak-STL theory, STL lost a LOT of toughness last year and that's something that Hitchcock really likes, Polak comes in as 6 defenseman to play in a system he knows. He's played pretty well in the World Cup, although he had a rough playoffs with SJ he did fetch two second's, 1 third I think is very attainable

    Fehr is a fourth line right wing on most PITS depth charts, most AGM's by Pens fans always have them dishing him out. What this does is give them a younger bottom six player on a 1 year contract instead of 2m at 2 years.

    Hunwick will be sought after, he munches minutes and although fits in a bottom six role, he's a lot more mobile and a PK specialist, only way they don't trade him is if Babcock likes him too much, Greening was on pace for roughly 40 points last year, I know it was a small sample size but he's a good depth acquisition with a big body and for a 7th not really giving much up.

    Oleksiak is so far down their depth chart, has really struggled, basically a swap of a depth defenseman for a depth forward that will probably make a bigger impact than Oleksiak

    Dal Colle definitely not a elite high end prospect but good try.

    Also why do you need to add that last sentence like you're so high and mighty, like my god it's annoying as **** you make awful trades all the time
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 12:15 p.m.
    #3
    Still a Leafs Fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2015
    Posts: 5,565
    Likes: 661
    NYI trade is terrible... Dal Colle alone has extremely more value then Fehr
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 12:31 p.m.
    #4
    leafs1967again
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 1,626
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Quoting: leafs1967again
    You and I are really off on our values.

    Kap+2nd does not give you a sniff of Brodin.

    STL wants nothing to do with Polak. He has been exposed the past 6 months.

    Fehr > Holland (which is why they just resigned him for that $$$)

    Hunwick alove does not get you better than a 4th and Greening has zero (as in negative) value still.

    DAL will keep Oleksiak instead of a zero value player even with 50% retention. In what world does a cap dump get you a young d man?

    NYI will not be moving their elite high end prospect for Fehr, even with a cap dump.

    Really bad thread IMO. Really really bad


    Although Brodin had early success he really struggled last season (http://www.tsn.ca/off-season-game-plan-minnesota-wild-1.496822) I think you're right I should add some more

    This is my Polak-STL theory, STL lost a LOT of toughness last year and that's something that Hitchcock really likes, Polak comes in as 6 defenseman to play in a system he knows. He's played pretty well in the World Cup, although he had a rough playoffs with SJ he did fetch two second's, 1 third I think is very attainable

    Fehr is a fourth line right wing on most PITS depth charts, most AGM's by Pens fans always have them dishing him out. What this does is give them a younger bottom six player on a 1 year contract instead of 2m at 2 years.

    Hunwick will be sought after, he munches minutes and although fits in a bottom six role, he's a lot more mobile and a PK specialist, only way they don't trade him is if Babcock likes him too much, Greening was on pace for roughly 40 points last year, I know it was a small sample size but he's a good depth acquisition with a big body and for a 7th not really giving much up.

    Oleksiak is so far down their depth chart, has really struggled, basically a swap of a depth defenseman for a depth forward that will probably make a bigger impact than Oleksiak

    Dal Colle definitely not a elite high end prospect but good try.

    Also why do you need to add that last sentence like you're so high and mighty, like my god it's annoying as **** you make awful trades all the time


    Dal Colle was selected 5th overall 2 years ago. He is a top 20-25 prospect. He is an elite prospect.

    You do realize Michalek is garbage, right? Leafs took him as a cap dump...why does he make Dallas, a Cup contender, better? He makes them much worse.

    Polak was not good at the WCH. I know you are very biased but he played bottom 6 minutes on a terrible team. He was -2 in two games and even in the win over USA. Not a huge +- fan but if someone goes -2 then -2 to start the tourny and only plays 3 games he was not "playing well".
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 12:34 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2015
    Posts: 1,565
    Likes: 89
    Ya and he had an awful season, he's making his way back but no he definitely is not that good, barely ranked in top 50 at most, also I don't see how much different it is from WAS trade for Laich, TOR got a real good prospect and a second to save WAS 2.25 a year
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 12:49 p.m.
    #6
    leafs1967again
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 1,626
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Ya and he had an awful season, he's making his way back but no he definitely is not that good, barely ranked in top 50 at most, also I don't see how much different it is from WAS trade for Laich, TOR got a real good prospect and a second to save WAS 2.25 a year


    55 pts in 30 games after the trade and 18 in 9 in playoffs. Shall you continue to make a fool of yourself?
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 12:50 p.m.
    #7
    leafs1967again
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 1,626
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Ya and he had an awful season, he's making his way back but no he definitely is not that good, barely ranked in top 50 at most, also I don't see how much different it is from WAS trade for Laich, TOR got a real good prospect and a second to save WAS 2.25 a year


    Connor Carrick was literally not wanted in WSH. Made his debut in 13/14 playing significant # of games and got buried for 2 years. Looks like we got lucky on that one
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 1:09 p.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2015
    Posts: 1,565
    Likes: 89
    Quoting: leafs1967again
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Ya and he had an awful season, he's making his way back but no he definitely is not that good, barely ranked in top 50 at most, also I don't see how much different it is from WAS trade for Laich, TOR got a real good prospect and a second to save WAS 2.25 a year


    Connor Carrick was literally not wanted in WSH. Made his debut in 13/14 playing significant # of games and got buried for 2 years. Looks like we got lucky on that one


    Sorry but he was a good prospect, Toronto knew they were getting a good prospect and its not "luck" Carrick didn't all of a sudden hit a hot streak in the last 20 games of the year
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 2:35 p.m.
    #9
    leafs1967again
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 1,626
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Quoting: leafs1967again
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Ya and he had an awful season, he's making his way back but no he definitely is not that good, barely ranked in top 50 at most, also I don't see how much different it is from WAS trade for Laich, TOR got a real good prospect and a second to save WAS 2.25 a year


    Connor Carrick was literally not wanted in WSH. Made his debut in 13/14 playing significant # of games and got buried for 2 years. Looks like we got lucky on that one


    Sorry but he was a good prospect, Toronto knew they were getting a good prospect and its not "luck" Carrick didn't all of a sudden hit a hot streak in the last 20 games of the year


    He was not acquired to make the team in 16/17. If you believe that then you are misinformed. A 22 yr old who just signed a 2 year $650K per year contract with 30-40 NHL games under his belt does not ooze "Stud".
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 2:55 p.m.
    #10
    leafs1967again
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 1,626
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Ya and he had an awful season, he's making his way back but no he definitely is not that good, barely ranked in top 50 at most, also I don't see how much different it is from WAS trade for Laich, TOR got a real good prospect and a second to save WAS 2.25 a year


    Funniest thing about this post is they are trading a guy on the IR (Grabo) who won't be a cap hit LOL. Totally different. You kill me lol.
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 4:27 p.m.
    #11
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 60,924
    Likes: 23,463
    This is bad. What makes you think Grabo is going to LTIR for the next three years? If he comes back (likely) just what the Leafs 5 m of nothing.
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 4:51 p.m.
    #12
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 19,674
    Likes: 6,810
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Quoting: leafs1967again
    You and I are really off on our values.

    Kap+2nd does not give you a sniff of Brodin.

    STL wants nothing to do with Polak. He has been exposed the past 6 months.

    Fehr > Holland (which is why they just resigned him for that $$$)

    Hunwick alove does not get you better than a 4th and Greening has zero (as in negative) value still.

    DAL will keep Oleksiak instead of a zero value player even with 50% retention. In what world does a cap dump get you a young d man?

    NYI will not be moving their elite high end prospect for Fehr, even with a cap dump.

    Really bad thread IMO. Really really bad


    Although Brodin had early success he really struggled last season (http://www.tsn.ca/off-season-game-plan-minnesota-wild-1.496822) I think you're right I should add some more

    This is my Polak-STL theory, STL lost a LOT of toughness last year and that's something that Hitchcock really likes, Polak comes in as 6 defenseman to play in a system he knows. He's played pretty well in the World Cup, although he had a rough playoffs with SJ he did fetch two second's, 1 third I think is very attainable

    Fehr is a fourth line right wing on most PITS depth charts, most AGM's by Pens fans always have them dishing him out. What this does is give them a younger bottom six player on a 1 year contract instead of 2m at 2 years.

    Hunwick will be sought after, he munches minutes and although fits in a bottom six role, he's a lot more mobile and a PK specialist, only way they don't trade him is if Babcock likes him too much, Greening was on pace for roughly 40 points last year, I know it was a small sample size but he's a good depth acquisition with a big body and for a 7th not really giving much up.

    Oleksiak is so far down their depth chart, has really struggled, basically a swap of a depth defenseman for a depth forward that will probably make a bigger impact than Oleksiak

    Dal Colle definitely not a elite high end prospect but good try.

    Also why do you need to add that last sentence like you're so high and mighty, like my god it's annoying as **** you make awful trades all the time


    No prejudice intended but these are pretty bad.

    BTW For those who get offended by the word "bad", it just means they aren't realistic in terms of what the perceived value going back should be. (According to the general consensus - Unless of course that person has no idea what they are talking about) This isn't an insult to you, the person. No one here is high and mighty but we're allowed to comment whether we like it or not. If you can't take the criticism, don't post to the internet for everyone to see.
    Sep. 26, 2016 at 8:42 p.m.
    #13
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2015
    Posts: 1,565
    Likes: 89
    Quoting: F50marco
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Quoting: leafs1967again
    You and I are really off on our values.

    Kap+2nd does not give you a sniff of Brodin.

    STL wants nothing to do with Polak. He has been exposed the past 6 months.

    Fehr > Holland (which is why they just resigned him for that $$$)

    Hunwick alove does not get you better than a 4th and Greening has zero (as in negative) value still.

    DAL will keep Oleksiak instead of a zero value player even with 50% retention. In what world does a cap dump get you a young d man?

    NYI will not be moving their elite high end prospect for Fehr, even with a cap dump.

    Really bad thread IMO. Really really bad


    Although Brodin had early success he really struggled last season (http://www.tsn.ca/off-season-game-plan-minnesota-wild-1.496822) I think you're right I should add some more

    This is my Polak-STL theory, STL lost a LOT of toughness last year and that's something that Hitchcock really likes, Polak comes in as 6 defenseman to play in a system he knows. He's played pretty well in the World Cup, although he had a rough playoffs with SJ he did fetch two second's, 1 third I think is very attainable

    Fehr is a fourth line right wing on most PITS depth charts, most AGM's by Pens fans always have them dishing him out. What this does is give them a younger bottom six player on a 1 year contract instead of 2m at 2 years.

    Hunwick will be sought after, he munches minutes and although fits in a bottom six role, he's a lot more mobile and a PK specialist, only way they don't trade him is if Babcock likes him too much, Greening was on pace for roughly 40 points last year, I know it was a small sample size but he's a good depth acquisition with a big body and for a 7th not really giving much up.

    Oleksiak is so far down their depth chart, has really struggled, basically a swap of a depth defenseman for a depth forward that will probably make a bigger impact than Oleksiak

    Dal Colle definitely not a elite high end prospect but good try.

    Also why do you need to add that last sentence like you're so high and mighty, like my god it's annoying as **** you make awful trades all the time


    No prejudice intended but these are pretty bad.

    BTW For those who get offended by the word "bad", it just means they aren't realistic in terms of what the perceived value going back should be. (According to the general consensus - Unless of course that person has no idea what they are talking about) This isn't an insult to you, the person. No one here is high and mighty but we're allowed to comment whether we like it or not. If you can't take the criticism, don't post to the internet for everyone to see.


    no I can take criticism I post Leafs threads on here that takes being able to take criticism I just don't understand why he has to add bad really bad all the time, it's not constructive just annoying especially when he makes trades the exact same
    Sep. 27, 2016 at 8:53 a.m.
    #14
    leafs1967again
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 1,626
    Likes: 21
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Quoting: F50marco
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Quoting: leafs1967again
    You and I are really off on our values.

    Kap+2nd does not give you a sniff of Brodin.

    STL wants nothing to do with Polak. He has been exposed the past 6 months.

    Fehr > Holland (which is why they just resigned him for that $$$)

    Hunwick alove does not get you better than a 4th and Greening has zero (as in negative) value still.

    DAL will keep Oleksiak instead of a zero value player even with 50% retention. In what world does a cap dump get you a young d man?

    NYI will not be moving their elite high end prospect for Fehr, even with a cap dump.

    Really bad thread IMO. Really really bad


    Although Brodin had early success he really struggled last season (http://www.tsn.ca/off-season-game-plan-minnesota-wild-1.496822) I think you're right I should add some more

    This is my Polak-STL theory, STL lost a LOT of toughness last year and that's something that Hitchcock really likes, Polak comes in as 6 defenseman to play in a system he knows. He's played pretty well in the World Cup, although he had a rough playoffs with SJ he did fetch two second's, 1 third I think is very attainable

    Fehr is a fourth line right wing on most PITS depth charts, most AGM's by Pens fans always have them dishing him out. What this does is give them a younger bottom six player on a 1 year contract instead of 2m at 2 years.

    Hunwick will be sought after, he munches minutes and although fits in a bottom six role, he's a lot more mobile and a PK specialist, only way they don't trade him is if Babcock likes him too much, Greening was on pace for roughly 40 points last year, I know it was a small sample size but he's a good depth acquisition with a big body and for a 7th not really giving much up.

    Oleksiak is so far down their depth chart, has really struggled, basically a swap of a depth defenseman for a depth forward that will probably make a bigger impact than Oleksiak

    Dal Colle definitely not a elite high end prospect but good try.

    Also why do you need to add that last sentence like you're so high and mighty, like my god it's annoying as **** you make awful trades all the time


    No prejudice intended but these are pretty bad.

    BTW For those who get offended by the word "bad", it just means they aren't realistic in terms of what the perceived value going back should be. (According to the general consensus - Unless of course that person has no idea what they are talking about) This isn't an insult to you, the person. No one here is high and mighty but we're allowed to comment whether we like it or not. If you can't take the criticism, don't post to the internet for everyone to see.


    no I can take criticism I post Leafs threads on here that takes being able to take criticism I just don't understand why he has to add bad really bad all the time, it's not constructive just annoying especially when he makes trades the exact same


    MOST of the time I get the exact opposite. Sometimes people say good deals, sometimes they say Leafs lose. Yours Leafs come away laughing like bandits. That's the issue.
    Sep. 27, 2016 at 12:32 p.m.
    #15
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2015
    Posts: 1,565
    Likes: 89
    Quoting: leafs1967again
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Quoting: F50marco
    Quoting: LeafsFan
    Quoting: leafs1967again
    You and I are really off on our values.

    Kap+2nd does not give you a sniff of Brodin.

    STL wants nothing to do with Polak. He has been exposed the past 6 months.

    Fehr > Holland (which is why they just resigned him for that $$$)

    Hunwick alove does not get you better than a 4th and Greening has zero (as in negative) value still.

    DAL will keep Oleksiak instead of a zero value player even with 50% retention. In what world does a cap dump get you a young d man?

    NYI will not be moving their elite high end prospect for Fehr, even with a cap dump.

    Really bad thread IMO. Really really bad


    Although Brodin had early success he really struggled last season (http://www.tsn.ca/off-season-game-plan-minnesota-wild-1.496822) I think you're right I should add some more

    This is my Polak-STL theory, STL lost a LOT of toughness last year and that's something that Hitchcock really likes, Polak comes in as 6 defenseman to play in a system he knows. He's played pretty well in the World Cup, although he had a rough playoffs with SJ he did fetch two second's, 1 third I think is very attainable

    Fehr is a fourth line right wing on most PITS depth charts, most AGM's by Pens fans always have them dishing him out. What this does is give them a younger bottom six player on a 1 year contract instead of 2m at 2 years.

    Hunwick will be sought after, he munches minutes and although fits in a bottom six role, he's a lot more mobile and a PK specialist, only way they don't trade him is if Babcock likes him too much, Greening was on pace for roughly 40 points last year, I know it was a small sample size but he's a good depth acquisition with a big body and for a 7th not really giving much up.

    Oleksiak is so far down their depth chart, has really struggled, basically a swap of a depth defenseman for a depth forward that will probably make a bigger impact than Oleksiak

    Dal Colle definitely not a elite high end prospect but good try.

    Also why do you need to add that last sentence like you're so high and mighty, like my god it's annoying as **** you make awful trades all the time


    No prejudice intended but these are pretty bad.

    BTW For those who get offended by the word "bad", it just means they aren't realistic in terms of what the perceived value going back should be. (According to the general consensus - Unless of course that person has no idea what they are talking about) This isn't an insult to you, the person. No one here is high and mighty but we're allowed to comment whether we like it or not. If you can't take the criticism, don't post to the internet for everyone to see.


    no I can take criticism I post Leafs threads on here that takes being able to take criticism I just don't understand why he has to add bad really bad all the time, it's not constructive just annoying especially when he makes trades the exact same


    MOST of the time I get the exact opposite. Sometimes people say good deals, sometimes they say Leafs lose. Yours Leafs come away laughing like bandits. That's the issue.


    That's fine, looking back it's not a great post I just get annoyed by those unnecessary comments, like disagree that's fine I want to make better posts that's why I look at comments, but I'm looking for something a little more constructive
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll