SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

New trade idea for Josh Anderson

Created by: GMs
Team: 2020-21 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 11, 2020
Published: Sep. 11, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,500,000
4$3,750,000
2$1,700,000
2$925,000
2$800,000
1$700,000
Trades
MTL
  1. Anderson, Josh [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
CBJ 2020 1st round pick ( 21st OA )
CBJ
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (CHI)
Additional Details:
MTL 2020 1st round pick ( 16th OA )
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
2023
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$77,422,976$0$3,137,500$4,077,024
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,800,000$4,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,083,333$3,083,333
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 2
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,350,000$4,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 11, 2020 at 12:50 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Sep. 11, 2020 at 12:56 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 2,275
That's a lot for Josh Anderson
GMs liked this.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 12:59 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
That's a lot for Josh Anderson


I thought the drop down was enough but I add an early 3rd round pick to make sure
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:26 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 815
Quoting: GMs


I actually think it would not be worth it for the Jackets. To me Anderson is worth more than just a move up 5 spots and a third. I don’t see the Jackets being interested in this.
CheechYou and benjgc liked this.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:36 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,650
Likes: 8,773
Pretty sure Jax accept that.
GMs liked this.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:39 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: GMs
@Ajp_18 thoughts ?


Yeah... I’m pretty sure Columbus accepts that.
GMs liked this.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:44 a.m.
#7
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,996
Likes: 730
Quoting: Jacketsman61
I actually think it would not be worth it for the Jackets. To me Anderson is worth more than just a move up 5 spots and a third. I don’t see the Jackets being interested in this.


I totally agree. It's not like in the NFL draft (although even there) where the difference between 16 and 21 is a little more pronounced. Too much parity with hockey players. Not enough for Anderson IMO but decent thought process.
GMs and benjgc liked this.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 8:00 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 815
Quoting: Ajp_18
Yeah... I’m pretty sure Columbus accepts that.


Interesting? Why do you think that is a good trade?
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:14 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 888
Quoting: Ajp_18
Yeah... I’m pretty sure Columbus accepts that.


I disagree. The difference in who's gonna be available at 16 and 21 isn't that notable this year. None of Holloway/Zary/Mysak/Foerster/Bourque/Amirov/Brisson are likely to be ready to contribute in 20-21, and at least one (and probably at least two or three) of those guys will be available at 21.

Now, if by some miracle someone like Holtz, Quinn, Lundell or Mercer should slip to 16, it's possibly a different story.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:19 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: Jacketsman61
Interesting? Why do you think that is a good trade?


We get to move up 5 spots in the draft and we are getting a 3rd. The difference in the 1st could mean the difference of getting a player like Zary or getting like a player like Foudy.
GMs liked this.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:27 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: benjgc
I disagree. The difference in who's gonna be available at 16 and 21 isn't that notable this year. None of Holloway/Zary/Mysak/Foerster/Bourque/Amirov/Brisson are likely to be ready to contribute in 20-21, and at least one (and probably at least two or three) of those guys will be available at 21.

Now, if by some miracle someone like Holtz, Quinn, Lundell or Mercer should slip to 16, it's possibly a different story.


You would be wrong then. There’s a lot of hype on this draft, just like there was last year and almost every other year. Moving up 5 spots just means there’s more on the table for us to pick.

Also I don’t want any of the players you named to drop except Holtz and possibly Mercer. Lundell was dropping all year and Quinn was a shock the rose super quickly at the end of the year and imo is all hype.

The players I want Columbus to get one of; Zary, Jarvis, Mysak, or Gunler. All of them will be NHL ready by 2021.
GMs liked this.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:34 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 888
Quoting: Ajp_18
You would be wrong then. There’s a lot of hype on this draft, just like there was last year and almost every other year. Moving up 5 spots just means there’s more on the table for us to pick.

Also I don’t want any of the players you named to drop except Holtz and possibly Mercer. Lundell was dropping all year and Quinn was a shock the rose super quickly at the end of the year and imo is all hype.

The players I want Columbus to get one of; Zary, Jarvis, Mysak, or Gunler. All of them will be NHL ready by 2021.


Well, Mysak and Gunler are both fairly likely to be there at 21, and Jarvis and Zary conceivably could be, too. So giving up Andy for the five-pick difference doesn't appeal to me. And it definitely is a well-hyped year because it's a very deep draft, which means good things for us despite picking in the back third of the first round.

I'd rather keep our spot and add a second-rounder instead.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:40 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: benjgc
Well, Mysak and Gunler are both fairly likely to be there at 21, and Jarvis and Zary conceivably could be, too. So giving up Andy for the five-pick difference doesn't appeal to me. And it definitely is a well-hyped year because it's a very deep draft, which means good things for us despite picking in the back third of the first round.

I'd rather keep our spot and add a second-rounder instead.


So you rather have a late 2nd rounder vs Anderson than moving 5 spots in the first round and getting an early 3rd rounder ? Make sense bud !
Ajp_18 liked this.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:41 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: benjgc
Well, Mysak and Gunler are both fairly likely to be there at 21, and Jarvis and Zary conceivably could be, too. So giving up Andy for the five-pick difference doesn't appeal to me. And it definitely is a well-hyped year because it's a very deep draft, which means good things for us despite picking in the back third of the first round.

I'd rather keep our spot and add a second-rounder instead.


I’d doubt any of them are available at 21st OA. We also aren’t adding a 2020 2nd for Anderson. No one is going to trade more then a 2020 3rd for him with his injury and lack of wanting to be in Columbus. I’d be that Anderson signs a 1 year contract and either walks at the end of the year or we get a trade package like Chicago got for Lehner as everyone knows Anderson would rather no be in Columbus.
GMs liked this.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:48 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 888
Quoting: GMs
So you rather have a late 2nd rounder vs Anderson than moving 5 spots in the first round and getting an early 3rd rounder ? Make sense bud !


I meant a second and a third, rather than just the five-spot difference and the third.
GMs liked this.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 1:51 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 888
Quoting: Ajp_18
I’d doubt any of them are available at 21st OA. We also aren’t adding a 2020 2nd for Anderson. No one is going to trade more then a 2020 3rd for him with his injury and lack of wanting to be in Columbus. I’d be that Anderson signs a 1 year contract and either walks at the end of the year or we get a trade package like Chicago got for Lehner as everyone knows Anderson would rather no be in Columbus.


Given Dreger's recent comments about Anderson having interest in a long-term deal in Columbus, and the fact that a contract above $2.181M (which his camp will surely demand) will require at least a 2021 second-rounder on an offer sheet, I'd say the bidding starts at a 2020 second with sweeteners thrown in. My preference, though, is to sign him to a 5x4 deal and figure it out. He can't reasonably demand a lot more money than that, and if he really wants long-term, then he gives us a much stronger forward corps.

EDIT: And every single mock I've seen has at least two or three of the Mysak/Zary/Foerster/Bourque/Gunler/Brisson/Amirov group available at 21.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 2:03 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: benjgc
Given Dreger's recent comments about Anderson having interest in a long-term deal in Columbus, and the fact that a contract above $2.181M (which his camp will surely demand) will require at least a 2021 second-rounder on an offer sheet, I'd say the bidding starts at a 2020 second with sweeteners thrown in. My preference, though, is to sign him to a 5x4 deal and figure it out. He can't reasonably demand a lot more money than that, and if he really wants long-term, then he gives us a much stronger forward corps.

EDIT: And every single mock I've seen has at least two or three of the Mysak/Zary/Foerster/Bourque/Gunler/Brisson/Amirov group available at 21.


Actions speak louder then words. I’ll believe Anderson wants to stay when it happens... his actions around the shoulder injury and not trusting the team doctors or the team.

Also Derger is known for not having the best information...
GMs liked this.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 2:08 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 888
Quoting: Ajp_18
Actions speak louder then words. I’ll believe Anderson wants to stay when it happens... his actions around the shoulder injury and not trusting the team doctors or the team.

Also Derger is known for not having the best information...


Oh, I fully believe that Darren Ferris leaked that to Dreger. My question is... why? What's the endgame for doing that? What does Anderson's camp get out of it?
Sep. 11, 2020 at 2:17 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: benjgc
Oh, I fully believe that Darren Ferris leaked that to Dreger. My question is... why? What's the endgame for doing that? What does Anderson's camp get out of it?


It helps him with potential offersheets and teams who’d be willing to trade for him. It shows he’s willing to sign somewhere long term. I highly doubt he’d do that in Columbus.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 2:21 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 888
Quoting: Ajp_18
It helps him with potential offersheets and teams who’d be willing to trade for him. It shows he’s willing to sign somewhere long term. I highly doubt he’d do that in Columbus.


Which, in turn, helps Columbus by driving up demand for Anderson. So that rumor is not a bad thing, in my opinion.
Sep. 11, 2020 at 2:26 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 6,441
Quoting: benjgc
Which, in turn, helps Columbus by driving up demand for Anderson. So that rumor is not a bad thing, in my opinion.


Never said it was bad.... just said it’s not a great source and I’ll believe it when I see it.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll