SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Trades

(PIT/MIN) - Bjugstad for conditional 2021 7th round pick

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Sep. 12, 2020 at 12:48 p.m.
#51
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,569
Likes: 6,714
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Don't forget that this guy costs 5.25M despite his cap hit being 4.1M. I think that takes quite a few teams out of the market, like Ottawa and Florida.



Yeah thats true. Probably a huge factor.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 1:11 p.m.
#52
Habs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 409
Likes: 136
I think most people would agree that it isn't out of the realm of possibility that Bjugstad is more valuable than Kapanen this season. PIT traded one for a 7th, PIT acquired one for a 1st +
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 2:18 p.m.
#53
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 373
Quoting: Joe_La_Garnotte
WTF the buyout was lower than that retain salary


You can't buy out an injured player
Sep. 12, 2020 at 2:20 p.m.
#54
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 373
Quoting: Brian2016
Why didn't JR just buyout this contract???


You can't buyout an injured player
Sep. 12, 2020 at 2:24 p.m.
#55
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Caufzi
I think most people would agree that it isn't out of the realm of possibility that Bjugstad is more valuable than Kapanen this season. PIT traded one for a 7th, PIT acquired one for a 1st +


Dumbest comment of the year goes to:
Sep. 12, 2020 at 3:01 p.m.
#56
May contain nuts
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 6,612
Likes: 2,016
Guerin to Rutherford: "This is a really good deal for us in Minnesota, so definitely we are saying yes to this one. I hope you know what you are doing."
Sep. 12, 2020 at 3:25 p.m.
#57
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 246
Quoting: mhockey91
Dumbest comment of the year goes to:


I'm not a fan of Kapanen as a top 6 guy and that comment is insane.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 3:56 p.m.
#58
Western Champs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2015
Posts: 272
Likes: 251
Edited Sep. 12, 2020 at 7:56 p.m.
Quoting: DonkeyLips
You can't buyout an injured player


I know that you can't buyout an injured player, I didn't know that he was currently injured
Sep. 12, 2020 at 4:03 p.m.
#59
Western Champs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2015
Posts: 272
Likes: 251
Edited Sep. 12, 2020 at 4:39 p.m.
Quoting: JayTea
How did Minnesota go wrong on this? $2m cap when they have plenty for a position they need (right handed center) for a CONDITIONAL 7th?


Quoting: JayTea
How did Minnesota go wrong on this? $2m cap when they have plenty for a position they need (right handed center) for a CONDITIONAL 7th?


Yah but always injured
Rangsey liked this.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 4:45 p.m.
#60
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 373
Quoting: Joe_La_Garnotte
I know that you can't buyout an injured player, I didn't know that he was injured


He just had spinal surgery. More likely he never plays again than anything else.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 5:07 p.m.
#61
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 5,012
Likes: 3,523
Quoting: DonkeyLips
You can't buyout an injured player


Then why not just place him on LTIR? I'm not trying to be difficult. I'm just not clear on the process.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 5:49 p.m.
#62
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 373
Quoting: Brian2016
Then why not just place him on LTIR? I'm not trying to be difficult. I'm just not clear on the process.


Putting him on ltir won't create cap space. They will still be on the hook for 4.1 million cap hit and have to pay him over 5 million in actual salary. If they truly are trying to spend less that is the number that really matters. Yeah they didn't get anything back in this trade, but they were able to shed actual dollars and open up 2 million in cap space.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 7:24 p.m.
#63
14m in dead cap
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 3,058
Quoting: Joe_La_Garnotte
Yah but always injured


And whats the risk to them? They have cap space to spare, the pick is conditional. Best case scenario? They have a 3C. Worst case scenario? They're in the same situation they were in before trading for him.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 7:53 p.m.
#64
Western Champs
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2015
Posts: 272
Likes: 251
Quoting: DonkeyLips
He just had spinal surgery. More likely he never plays again than anything else.


Then I really don't understand the trade in Minnesota's perspective
Sep. 12, 2020 at 9:19 p.m.
#65
Hockey God Genius
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 811
Quoting: JayTea
It's almost comical how many Pens fans still do ACGMs trading Murray to the Wild and getting a great return.


I dont kno if its comical but prob not going to happen w/ MIN but it could , Ya never really kno.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 9:20 p.m.
#66
Hockey God Genius
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 811
Quoting: Caufzi
I think most people would agree that it isn't out of the realm of possibility that Bjugstad is more valuable than Kapanen this season. PIT traded one for a 7th, PIT acquired one for a 1st +


LOL
Sep. 12, 2020 at 9:22 p.m.
#67
Hockey God Genius
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 811
Quoting: mhockey91
Dumbest comment of the year goes to:


I just read it & had to read it again, then my drink came out of my nose from lol
mhockey91 liked this.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 11:05 p.m.
#68
This is gonna hurt
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 119
Likes: 26
Jesus christ. What the hell is JR thinking? 50% Salary retained!
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:36 a.m.
#69
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 373
Quoting: Joe_La_Garnotte
Then I really don't understand the trade in Minnesota's perspective


They are taking a risk free chance. If he doesn't work out they loose nothing. If he does they got him for a 7th round pick. There really is no downside.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:24 p.m.
#70
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 5
Likes: 5
So the Pens got rid of an injury riddled player who's been close to the replacement level and unloaded a half of his bad contract for free

Minnesota got a player who might be sorta useful and if he's not — again, it's for free and it's only one year

But yeah, Pens lost the "find a third line center" game again frown
Sep. 14, 2020 at 7:04 a.m.
#71
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 349
Likes: 246
A buyout would have cost about the same in terms of real money, and would have saved $1.45M in cap hit this year (but would have added $1.75M) next year. So a getting a 7th is probably slightly better. However, given the Penguins are a team whose best players are aging, and there is a cap crunch around the league right now, with an expansion draft next year, I actually think the cap space this year, has more value than cap space next year.

So the question is really if it made sense to buyout Bjugstad. When he has played he has been a 15 goal, 30 point center, but last year he played very little. The condition on the 7th is that Bjugstad has to play at least 70 games or get 35 points, so basically a 7th goes back to Pittsburgh only in the circumstance where Bjugstad proves he's not a buyout level player.

So basically, if Bjugstad isn't very good, the Pens get nothing, and would have been just as well off to buy Bjugstad out.

Or if Bjugstad is pretty good, the Pens get a 7th, in which case they lose the deal because they retained salary and only got a 7th on a player that was actually decent.

It feels like watching a friend bet on every Stanley cup favourite when they didn't realize they will be down money no matter what the outcome is.

This isn't a horrendous trade, I mean if Bjugstad's value is around the level of a buyout, there isn't much of a difference, it's just kind of funny that a buyout might actually have been better than getting nothing, but getting something means Minnesota wins the deal hands down.
rollie1967 liked this.
Sep. 14, 2020 at 10:44 a.m.
#72
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 833
Edited Sep. 14, 2020 at 10:53 a.m.
Quoting: mondo
JR to Pens fans after they said the Kapanen trade was awful:

803.png


LOL what do you mean?

Pittsburgh basically traded:

1) 1st round pick (2020 = 15th overall)
2) 2nd round pick (2018 = Hallander)
3) Nicholas Bjugstad
4) Evan Rodrigues

In an over payment for Kapanen ... and lost cap space in the process.

Bjugstad's original cap hit was $4,100,000 (Rodrigues wasn't getting qualified at $2,000,000 plus).

Now Kapanen ($3,200,000) + Bjugstad's retention ($2,050,000) = $5,250,000 in cap space.

So he lost $1,200,000 + the future (potential) cap savings of two ELC's.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit