SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Phillip Danault to San Jose in Package Deal

Created by: CheechYou
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 12, 2020
Published: Sep. 12, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Draft Protections

FORWARDS
1. Couture
2. Hertl
3. Meier
4. Labanc
5. Danault
6. Smith
7. Kane
DEFENSE:
1. Karlsson
2. Vlasic
3. Ferraro
GOALIE
1. Melnichuk

Seattle Kraken forced to choose between Burns, Jones, and Simek.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,700,000
2$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,750,000
2$4,400,000
Trades
MTL
  1. Gambrell, Dylan
  2. Roy, Jérémy [RFA Rights]
  3. Sörensen, Marcus
  4. 2021 1st round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
Conditional 2022 2nd round pick (SJS) if Danault gets extension/resigns with Sharks OR Sharks win cup in 2021 & Danualt plays in a minimum of 50% of SJ's playoff games.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$74,238,332$0$252,500$7,261,668

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,083,333$3,083,333
C
UFA - 1
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$763,333$763,333 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$736,666$736,666 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 12, 2020 at 3:45 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 3,063
Who are the 2 forwards you are required to expose to Seattle that meet the minimum requirements?

Noesen can be 1 but with only 40 games played this season you are taking a big risk on an injury not happening and it requires a 2 year deal rather than a 1.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 3:48 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Free Palestine
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 745
Quoting: Byrr
Who are the 2 forwards you are required to expose to Seattle that meet the minimum requirements? Noesen can be 1 but with only 40 games played this season you are taking a big risk on an injury not happening and it requires a 2 year deal rather than a 1.


I did not know about this requirement... I thought I was being GM-savy, thanks for letting me know.

I suppose give extensions to two of True, Blichfeld, and Noesen and expose two of them too in that case. Kellman would be exposed too if he plays in 40 games.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 3:53 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 3,063
Quoting: CheechYou
I did not know about this requirement... I thought I was being GM-savy, thanks for letting me know.

I suppose give extensions to two of True, Blichfeld, and Noesen and expose two of them too in that case. Kellman would be exposed too if he plays in 40 games.


True and Blichfeld should be fine as 1 years if you want to expose them as they'll still be RFAs but with few games played this season they'll need to play the majority of next. Noesen just needs the 2nd year of a deal cause hes a UFA.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 3:57 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
MTL will trade Danault to a team he would want to sign an extension and they will get full value for him
They’ll go quality > quantity too
Sep. 12, 2020 at 4:00 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 21
Quoting: GMs
MTL will trade Danault to a team he would want to sign an extension and they will get full value for him
They’ll go quality > quantity too


IMO i think MB will trade Danault at the deadline.. because other GM always paid to much. i believe Danault can get that for is value at the deadline
Sep. 12, 2020 at 5:20 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 2,945
Quoting: Nelt8
IMO i think MB will trade Danault at the deadline.. because other GM always paid to much. i believe Danault can get that for is value at the deadline


Especially if Montreal retains 50%. It would be a short stint, but he would literally be a potentially top 5 selke candidate for 1.5 million. That's gonna attract a LOT of attention.
Nelt8 liked this.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 5:22 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 2,945
Quoting: Byrr
Who are the 2 forwards you are required to expose to Seattle that meet the minimum requirements?

Noesen can be 1 but with only 40 games played this season you are taking a big risk on an injury not happening and it requires a 2 year deal rather than a 1.


Probably Kellman/Noesen to be honest.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 5:31 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,969
Danault+Smith don’t make this squad a contender again. You still have a sieve in net and the average age is like 47
Sep. 14, 2020 at 4:54 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 143
Likes: 21
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Especially if Montreal retains 50%. It would be a short stint, but he would literally be a potentially top 5 selke candidate for 1.5 million. That's gonna attract a LOT of attention.


in that case, Danault can fetch a first
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll