SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dallas Blockbuster

Created by: crankshaft
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 12, 2020
Published: Sep. 12, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Sörensen, Marcus
  2. 2022 1st round pick (SJS)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$76,744,165$0$1,680,000$4,755,835
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$9,850,000$9,850,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$736,666$736,666 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$768,333$768,333 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$763,333$763,333 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$737,500$737,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 12, 2020 at 11:12 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 2,085
Honestly, Freddie for a cheap 3rd liner and a 1st seems ok... idk much about Sorenson though - this is assuming we've already got a replacement G and we just wanna dump fred
Sep. 12, 2020 at 11:13 p.m.
#2
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,935
Likes: 914
Dallas isn't doing that and the Sharks aren't either.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 11:18 p.m.
#3
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,683
Likes: 1,879
Can't see SJ doing either of these trades, an 11.2M Tyler Seguin is not a good idea. And Andersen is not the answer, a 1st for a rental goalie coming off a bad year, making 5M.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 11:18 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,560
Likes: 3,278
This trade makes Dallas worse. Not because Burns is bad, but Seguin is a pretty vital component of their offense.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 11:28 p.m.
#5
gdg_9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 192
Likes: 30
Quoting: Klara
Can't see SJ doing either of these trades, an 11.2M Tyler Seguin is not a good idea. And Andersen is not the answer, a 1st for a rental goalie coming off a bad year, making 5M.


While I don't see this working for SJ either... Andersen is not actually making $5m next season. He only has $1m in actual dollars left to be paid on his contract, which is attractive to many teams trying to cut costs.
Sep. 12, 2020 at 11:33 p.m.
#6
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,683
Likes: 1,879
Quoting: gdg_9
While I don't see this working for SJ either... Andersen is not actually making $5m next season. He only has $1m in actual dollars left to be paid on his contract, which is attractive to many teams trying to cut costs.


SJ has no intention of cutting costs, and that doesn't mean he isn't 5M cap.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:26 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
This trade makes Dallas worse. Not because Burns is bad, but Seguin is a pretty vital component of their offense.


Sure isn't on this playoff run...Seguin ranks 9th on the team in points and only two goals.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:30 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Quoting: gdg_9
While I don't see this working for SJ either... Andersen is not actually making $5m next season. He only has $1m in actual dollars left to be paid on his contract, which is attractive to many teams trying to cut costs.


his cap hit is still 5 mil. SJ doesn't need to cut costs, their owner is one of the richest men alive and his company powers most of nhl.com...
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:36 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Quoting: Klara
Can't see SJ doing either of these trades, an 11.2M Tyler Seguin is not a good idea. And Andersen is not the answer, a 1st for a rental goalie coming off a bad year, making 5M.


Seguin's cap is 9.85..where did you get 11.2?

I don't think Seguin would be a target for Wilson but he isn't one to shy away from players such as Seguin who is coming off a so far very disappointing playoff statistically.

I pick Andersen because he only has one year left. I have a hard time seeing Khudobin or Greiss signing on for 1 or 2 years even, at this point in their careers they will want multi year deals. We want to see Melnichuk or Korenar step into at least a backup role in the next year or 2 and that won't happen with a multi year signing vet and Jones' immovable contract. Unless Doug goes after Bernier or signs someone like Craig Anderson or Jimmy Howard to 1 year deals...Both are not very ideal for a team looking to rebound.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:43 a.m.
#10
EddieBower
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 100
Likes: 12
Why would Dallas ever do this?
Sep. 13, 2020 at 9:13 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: crankshaft
Sure isn't on this playoff run...Seguin ranks 9th on the team in points and only two goals.


Doesn’t mean he’s getting traded for nothing (not dumping on Burns, I’m dumping on Burns’ contract). He could be fighting an injury. Doesn’t look like himself. He’s 7 years younger than Burns. I’d rather keep Tyler all day long. You crap on him then put him on the top line. Lol
crankshaft liked this.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 9:16 a.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: Klara
Can't see SJ doing either of these trades, an 11.2M Tyler Seguin is not a good idea. And Andersen is not the answer, a 1st for a rental goalie coming off a bad year, making 5M.


They don’t do the Dallas trade?? If Dallas was dumb enough to do this SJ could flip Tyler for quality futures. Poof. Burns’ contract is mostly gone and they have quality pieces moving forward
Sep. 13, 2020 at 9:20 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: goodfella
Dallas isn't doing that and the Sharks aren't either.


Sharks do it all day long. The value favors them too much to pass even if it isn’t a great fit
crankshaft liked this.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 10:52 a.m.
#14
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,683
Likes: 1,879
Quoting: crankshaft
Seguin's cap is 9.85..where did you get 11.2?

I don't think Seguin would be a target for Wilson but he isn't one to shy away from players such as Seguin who is coming off a so far very disappointing playoff statistically.

I pick Andersen because he only has one year left. I have a hard time seeing Khudobin or Greiss signing on for 1 or 2 years even, at this point in their careers they will want multi year deals. We want to see Melnichuk or Korenar step into at least a backup role in the next year or 2 and that won't happen with a multi year signing vet and Jones' immovable contract. Unless Doug goes after Bernier or signs someone like Craig Anderson or Jimmy Howard to 1 year deals...Both are not very ideal for a team looking to rebound.


Retention + his contract.

Khudobin for 3 years is a much better option than a 1st for 1 year of Andersen. Better goalie, cheaper, and a UFA.
crankshaft liked this.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 10:54 a.m.
#15
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 2,683
Likes: 1,879
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
They don’t do the Dallas trade?? If Dallas was dumb enough to do this SJ could flip Tyler for quality futures. Poof. Burns’ contract is mostly gone and they have quality pieces moving forward


It's a cap hit issue, they have to find someone willing to take Seguin... And that probably won't be easy. Or else they are even more top heavy.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:17 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Edited Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:24 p.m.
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
They don’t do the Dallas trade?? If Dallas was dumb enough to do this SJ could flip Tyler for quality futures. Poof. Burns’ contract is mostly gone and they have quality pieces moving forward


Well flipping Seguin is easy-ish but flipping his contract is another story. His playoff record is pretty lacking as well...he doesn't seem to show up.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:26 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Quoting: Klara
Retention + his contract.

Khudobin for 3 years is a much better option than a 1st for 1 year of Andersen. Better goalie, cheaper, and a UFA.


His playoff performance this year might add another few hundred thousand to his next deal. Greiss might still be the very best option if we go UFA. (I still think Doug swings a trade for a goalie) If not a goalie, he's definitely moving picks for something. It's not his style to hold onto draft picks.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 1:43 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Doesn’t mean he’s getting traded for nothing (not dumping on Burns, I’m dumping on Burns’ contract). He could be fighting an injury. Doesn’t look like himself. He’s 7 years younger than Burns. I’d rather keep Tyler all day long. You crap on him then put him on the top line. Lol


Burns is still an elite dman. Tyler seems to me to be too mercurial as a player in the playoffs. I mean, 13 goals in 81 playoff games career is just plain bad for whats supposed to be an elite level goal scorer. For this reason alone I don't do this trade. It isn't just this playoff for Tyler, it's all of them except last year. But he's never been a PPG player in the postseason which imo can be nothing less than disappointing.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:08 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: crankshaft
Burns is still an elite dman. Tyler seems to me to be too mercurial as a player in the playoffs. I mean, 13 goals in 81 playoff games career is just plain bad for whats supposed to be an elite level goal scorer. For this reason alone I don't do this trade. It isn't just this playoff for Tyler, it's all of them except last year. But he's never been a PPG player in the postseason which imo can be nothing less than disappointing.


Burns has shown signs of regression. He’s 35. I don’t see him being elite any more as soon as this coming season. Both players are going to most likely be disappointing for most of the remainder of their contracts. We have Miro on defense. We don’t have a 1C in the system. Might not even have a legit 2C after Pavs leaves. I’m hopeful for Dell, but not sure the offense will be there. Hintz is good but doesn’t drive his own line yet. So I’d rather keep Tyler. When you add age to the equation it’s a definite no brainer
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:20 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Burns has shown signs of regression. He’s 35. I don’t see him being elite any more as soon as this coming season. Both players are going to most likely be disappointing for most of the remainder of their contracts. We have Miro on defense. We don’t have a 1C in the system. Might not even have a legit 2C after Pavs leaves. I’m hopeful for Dell, but not sure the offense will be there. Hintz is good but doesn’t drive his own line yet. So I’d rather keep Tyler. When you add age to the equation it’s a definite no brainer


Just last season burns had 83 points in 82 games. Every shark was bad last year so I really wouldn't look into it much. To be honest, going into next season I would rather have Burns over Seguin but Burns will decline for real in a couple years. Burns shows up in the playoffs, defensively as well. Seguin is simply a no show, and watching his game this playoffs, he seems lethargic.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 8:17 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 2,731
Quoting: crankshaft
Just last season burns had 83 points in 82 games. Every shark was bad last year so I really wouldn't look into it much. To be honest, going into next season I would rather have Burns over Seguin but Burns will decline for real in a couple years. Burns shows up in the playoffs, defensively as well. Seguin is simply a no show, and watching his game this playoffs, he seems lethargic.


Which is why I think he may be hurt. It still doesn’t make sense for the Stars. If anything we need another scoring forward
Sep. 13, 2020 at 8:37 p.m.
#22
Grierless Sharks Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,935
Likes: 914
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Sharks do it all day long. The value favors them too much to pass even if it isn’t a great fit


I meant the TOR trade. Sharks do the DAL trade all day.
SlevinKalevra liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll