SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Upgraded Team

Created by: cac71
Team: 2020-21 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 13, 2020
Published: Sep. 13, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
2$1,500,000
1$950,000
1$1,250,000
2$3,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,500,000
5$5,500,000
5$5,000,000
Trades
1.
NJD
  1. Benn, Jordie
  2. Virtanen, Jake [RFA Rights]
  3. Woo, Jett
  4. 2021 3rd round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
New Jersey gives away severson but gains 2 roster players in Benn and Virtanen as well as receiving a pick and prospect to make it worth it
2.
DET
  1. Baertschi, Sven ($1,500,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Canucks clearly no longer have any use for Baertschi and Detroit really has no use for Pickard. Detroit can gain Baertschi at almost half retained for 1 season and see if he can be a top 9 option while not giving up a pick
3.
VAN
  1. Jankowski, Mark [RFA Rights]
  2. 2021 5th round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. Stecher, Troy [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
It does not seem like the Canucks are too keen on keeping Stecher although he is a decent right handed option. Jankowski had a poor year in Calgary so I think considering Hamonic is a UFA, Stecher could be a replacement option for them while Canucks gain a guy who could play 3rd line centre for cheap
4.
BUF
  1. Lockwood, William
  2. Sutter, Brandon
  3. 2021 5th round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
Buffalo had the 30th ranked pk last season. With this they upgrade their pk while gaining a prospect and a pick. Pretty much a lateral move salary wise.
5.
VAN
  1. Cernak, Erik [RFA Rights]
TBL
  1. Gaudette, Adam [RFA Rights]
  2. Rafferty, Brogan
  3. 2021 4th round pick (VAN)
Additional Details:
With Tampa's cap struggles and Cirelli, Sergachev, and Cernak all being RFA's expecting big pay raises, I think they might have to move on from Cernak. In return they acquire Adam Gaudette who is a decent forward they could probably sign for cheap, Brogan Rafferty who is a right handed D who could maybe push for a spot on their right side along with Cal Foote, and a pick
6.
LAK
  1. Palmu, Petrus
  2. Roussel, Antoine
Additional Details:
Kings take Roussel and and a prospect for an ahl guy. Mostly to clear space for canucks, but kings gain a bottom 6 player and a prospect in return
7.
DET
  1. Eriksson, Loui
Additional Details:
This might work better than the Alzner for Eriksson deal. Eriksson slightly higher cap hit but Canucks take on 1 extra year of Abdelkader's deal to even it out.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,365,211$1,700,000$5,400,000$3,134,789
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW
UFA - 1
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$950,000$950,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,500,000$5,500,000
G
UFA - 6
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$4,166,666$4,166,666
RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:49 p.m.
#1
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,340
Likes: 3,342
MTL isnt taking your cap dumps for that cheap.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:49 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,118
Likes: 18,340
"[TEAM A] gives away [GOOD PLAYER] but gains 2 roster players in [LESSER PLAYER] and [LESSER PLAYER] as well as receiving a pick and prospect to make it worth it"

Fill in the blanks...it's rarely getting accepted
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:57 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 494
Likes: 131
Nj declines very easily.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 2:57 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 61
Likes: 11
Quoting: Subbanator7667
MTL isnt taking your cap dumps for that cheap.


Which one did you not like? The Alzner for Eriksson deal or the Roussel one? I think the Alzner for Eriksson deal actually favours MTL but i would understand if you didn't like the Roussel trade. 3 mil dollar bottom 6 forward is a bit rich. What would you recommend I change?
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:01 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 61
Likes: 11
Quoting: JRoss
Nj declines very easily.


Ok that is fine. What would you recommend I change?
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:03 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 61
Likes: 11
Quoting: NHLfan10506
"[TEAM A] gives away [GOOD PLAYER] but gains 2 roster players in [LESSER PLAYER] and [LESSER PLAYER] as well as receiving a pick and prospect to make it worth it"

Fill in the blanks...it's rarely getting accepted


That is sound logic and makes sense. Not sure what Severson's value is. What would you recommend I change to make it more reasonable in your opinion?
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:03 p.m.
#7
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,340
Likes: 3,342
Quoting: cac71
Which one did you not like? The Alzner for Eriksson deal or the Roussel one? I think the Alzner for Eriksson deal actually favours MTL but i would understand if you didn't like the Roussel trade. 3 mil dollar bottom 6 forward is a bit rich. What would you recommend I change?


I would take on Roussel if he came with Virtanen and the Habs would rather just keep Alzner and buy him out or wait till his contract ends and leave him in Laval.
GMs liked this.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:09 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 61
Likes: 11
Quoting: Subbanator7667
I would take on Roussel if he came with Virtanen and the Habs would rather just keep Alzner and buy him out or wait till his contract ends and leave him in Laval.


Fair enough. I have not tried the buy out calculator to see what buying out Alzner would be like but I guess you could just continue to leave him in Laval. I was just thinking that their salaries would be somewhat of a lateral move and Eriksson would be a guy who could potentially play in MTL's lineup but your reasoning seems fair
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:11 p.m.
#9
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,931
Likes: 5,360
Gonna have to add a 3rd to the wings trade or you can keep baertschi
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:12 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
Flames accept. FYI Janko's QO is 1.75
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:16 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 61
Likes: 11
Quoting: Alfie11
Flames accept. FYI Janko's QO is 1.75


I wasn't sure what his QO would be but i'm thinking that's a bit much. Maybe we don't qualify him and try to sign him as a UFA. Not sure he's even worth 1.25 with the season he had this season
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:17 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 61
Likes: 11
Quoting: buffbry
Gonna have to add a 3rd to the wings trade or you can keep baertschi


A third seems like a bit much but I would understand a late round pick or throw in prospect to make it worth taking on for the wings.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:18 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
Quoting: cac71
I wasn't sure what his QO would be but i'm thinking that's a bit much. Maybe we don't qualify him and try to sign him as a UFA. Not sure he's even worth 1.25 with the season he had this season

Honestly he'd probably sign for that if nobody's gonna give him his QO
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:24 p.m.
#14
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,931
Likes: 5,360
Quoting: cac71
A third seems like a bit much but I would understand a late round pick or throw in prospect to make it worth taking on for the wings.


You can make the 3rd in 2022 to make it sting a bit less
Sep. 13, 2020 at 3:59 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
MTL isn’t interested in Roussel at all
We’ll need all the capspace necessary in 2021
Alzner vs Eriksson doesn’t make senses for us either, Alzner buried in the minor cost ~3.6M, Eriksson 6M ... Again, we need capspace for 2021
Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:08 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 61
Likes: 11
Quoting: GMs
MTL isn’t interested in Roussel at all
We’ll need all the capspace necessary in 2021
Alzner vs Eriksson doesn’t make senses for us either, Alzner buried in the minor cost ~3.6M, Eriksson 6M ... Again, we need capspace for 2021


My point with the Eriksson and Alzner deal is that Erikssons actual cash payment is lower even though his cap hit is higher. I understand your reasoning though, cap space is such a valuable asset on its own. As for Roussel I wasn't thinking MTL had a great amount of interest in him tbh I only traded him to MTL because he is French. That's the only connection there. You could replace MTL with any team with a decent amount of cap space and the deal would still stand. It wasn't about MTL having interest, it was more just about moving him and I only chose MTL because of the French connection. Thanks for your input
GMs liked this.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:18 p.m.
#17
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: cac71
My point with the Eriksson and Alzner deal is that Erikssons actual cash payment is lower even though his cap hit is higher. I understand your reasoning though, cap space is such a valuable asset on its own. As for Roussel I wasn't thinking MTL had a great amount of interest in him tbh I only traded him to MTL because he is French. That's the only connection there. You could replace MTL with any team with a decent amount of cap space and the deal would still stand. It wasn't about MTL having interest, it was more just about moving him and I only chose MTL because of the French connection. Thanks for your input


Actual money paid isn’t something the habs will make moves to change. Geoff Moulson doesn’t have any financial troubles, and putting the team in a position to win is obviously more important than saving a bit of money.

And while Roussel is french, he’s from France, and the only connection he has to Quebec is that he played 4 seasons in Chicoutimi. And even if he were from Quebec, that’s no reason to trade for a player.
GMs liked this.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:28 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 61
Likes: 11
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Actual money paid isn’t something the habs will make moves to change. Geoff Moulson doesn’t have any financial troubles, and putting the team in a position to win is obviously more important than saving a bit of money.

And while Roussel is french, he’s from France, and the only connection he has to Quebec is that he played 4 seasons in Chicoutimi. And even if he were from Quebec, that’s no reason to trade for a player.


I dont disagree with you at all. I figured the Eriksson for Alzner deal would actually help the habs as Eriksson is at least an NHL player still, just at a higher cap hit. And I wasnt insinuating that Moulson was in financial trouble but during covid times, I figured owners might want to shed some cash owed for this season while still upgrading the team albeit slightly. As for Roussel just because he is French is not a reason to trade for him, that is correct. For the Canucks lineup I just figured I would trade him to MTL and throw in a prospect. You could replace MTL with any team and the deal would stand for Roussel.
Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:36 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,299
Likes: 19,543
Quoting: cac71
I wasn't sure what his QO would be but i'm thinking that's a bit much. Maybe we don't qualify him and try to sign him as a UFA. Not sure he's even worth 1.25 with the season he had this season


Just take him out of the trade, a 5th for Stecher is still fair. Jankowski will very likely not get qualified by anyone.

Also no chance bolts do that
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:38 p.m.
#20
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: cac71
I dont disagree with you at all. I figured the Eriksson for Alzner deal would actually help the habs as Eriksson is at least an NHL player still, just at a higher cap hit. And I wasnt insinuating that Moulson was in financial trouble but during covid times, I figured owners might want to shed some cash owed for this season while still upgrading the team albeit slightly. As for Roussel just because he is French is not a reason to trade for him, that is correct. For the Canucks lineup I just figured I would trade him to MTL and throw in a prospect. You could replace MTL with any team and the deal would stand for Roussel.


That makes sense. I just don’t think that a 4th liner like Eriksson is worth the extra cap hit of $2.4 million this year, and $1.8 million next year (assuming both players get bought out). Instead we could just use Belzile, who is just as good, and would be making league minimum.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:41 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 61
Likes: 11
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Just take him out of the trade, a 5th for Stecher is still fair. Jankowski will very likely not get qualified by anyone.

Also no chance bolts do that


If I upgraded the 4th to a 2nd, do you think the bolts would accept that?
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:45 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 61
Likes: 11
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
That makes sense. I just don’t think that a 4th liner like Eriksson is worth the extra cap hit of $2.4 million this year, and $1.8 million next year (assuming both players get bought out). Instead we could just use Belzile, who is just as good, and would be making league minimum.


Makes sense. Maybe Detroit would be a better spot for Eriksson instead of MTL. Abdelkader at 4.75 mil i think for one extra season than Eriksson. Cap hit is higher on Eriksson but we take Abdelkader for one extra season. One for One deal would prob get that done.
Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:47 p.m.
#23
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
Quoting: cac71
Makes sense. Maybe Detroit would be a better spot for Eriksson instead of MTL. Abdelkader at 4.75 mil i think for one extra season than Eriksson. Cap hit is higher on Eriksson but we take Abdelkader for one extra season. One for One deal would prob get that done.


That would work better, especially since the Red Wings won’t be near the cap anytime soon.
Sep. 13, 2020 at 4:53 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 4,292
Likes: 2,340
So the Sabres lose the better player??
Sep. 13, 2020 at 5:01 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,118
Likes: 18,340
Quoting: cac71
That is sound logic and makes sense. Not sure what Severson's value is. What would you recommend I change to make it more reasonable in your opinion?


Good young player or prospect that fits into NJD rebuild. They have plenty of cap space to fill roster spots. They need top-six RW prospects, and young defensive d-men.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll