SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

1st ACGM

Created by: TheBetterTkachuk
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 14, 2020
Published: Sep. 14, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
H
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,250,000
4$3,000,000
4$2,567,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,250,000
2$1,500,000
3$4,000,000
1$1,500,000
2$1,750,000
Trades
1.
2.
CGY
  1. 2022 7th round pick (OTT)
OTT
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. 2021 1st round pick (CGY)
3.
CGY
  1. Andersen, Frederik
  2. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the OTT
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$71,574,500$0$32,500$9,925,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 4
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,567,000$2,567,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 7
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 14, 2020 at 7:34 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 4,214
Likes: 5,077
Welcome! There’s a lot of moving pieces in this ACGM. Not sure if CGY would move Andersson, if so, I’d be looking at this trade.
Sep. 14, 2020 at 7:35 a.m.
#2
Canes Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 1,250
Please tell me your name is from a xTech video lmao

" The Better Tkachuk "
Jeuck75 liked this.
Sep. 14, 2020 at 7:36 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,916
Likes: 19,293
Gaudreau trade is awful, a goalie can be acquired for much less.
Ottawa trade is extremely unrealistic.
Leafs trade is also bad, why would you trade Ras for a rental goalie? Especially after getting Gibson who is way better.
Hamonic should most certainly not be receiving a contract
No chance Jankowski is qualified
Oh and you are out of cap space and 3 players short of a full roster
Sep. 14, 2020 at 7:39 a.m.
#4
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 3,511
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Gaudreau trade is awful, a goalie can be acquired for much less.
Ottawa trade is extremely unrealistic.
Leafs trade is also bad, why would you trade Ras for a rental goalie? Especially after getiing Gibson.
Hamonic should most certainly not be receiving a contract
No chance Jankowski is qualified
Oh and you are out of cap space and 3 players sjort of a full roster


Don't think it is as bad as you think. Get a good starting goaltender locked up long term at a very reasonable price plus a good RHD.
Ottawa trade is the most realistic one here, in order to dump cap, you need to sweeten the deal.
Leafs trade isn't horrible (from the Leafs perspective at least). You're getting a damn good 1-2 punch in net for a year plus a 1st round pick.
No idea about Hamonic's value, or Jankowski.
You can run with a 20 man roster and have emergency call ups if there are any injuries.
Sep. 14, 2020 at 7:52 a.m.
#5
Oilers GM
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 566
I'm not a Flames fan but my one advice would be to keep all 3 of Tkachuk, Mangiapane, and Andersson

Andersson is a stud
Sep. 14, 2020 at 7:56 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 37,916
Likes: 19,293
Quoting: Ritzy
Don't think it is as bad as you think. Get a good starting goaltender locked up long term at a very reasonable price plus a good RHD.
Ottawa trade is the most realistic one here, in order to dump cap, you need to sweeten the deal.
Leafs trade isn't horrible (from the Leafs perspective at least). You're getting a damn good 1-2 punch in net for a year plus a 1st round pick.
No idea about Hamonic's value, or Jankowski.
You can run with a 20 man roster and have emergency call ups if there are any injuries.


First of all no chance Gibson is available so that trade is irrelevant but you dont trade an elite forward for a goalie in a flooded goalie market.
Lucic will never waive to Ottawa, that is why its unrealistic
Leafs trade is awful. Why would Calgary trade their best defense this year for a rental and a 1st in 2 years?
You cant run a 20 man squad and call people up when your AHL affiliate is 2000 kilometers south from you.
Sep. 14, 2020 at 8:18 a.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
Not even close to getting both Gibson and Manson, Gaudreau walks in 2 years for Philly. Gibson isn't available and that sure doesn't get him let alone adding Manson to the deal.
Sep. 14, 2020 at 8:40 a.m.
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,072
Likes: 22,466
As suggested.....minimum 22 man roster within the cap.
Gibson looks like. a cost efficient goalie for 7 years, so the Ducks aren't trading him.
Lucic has a NMC. Highly unlikely that NMC or NTC players waive to a poor team. And teams won't even trade for long term bad cap.
Sep. 14, 2020 at 10:28 a.m.
#9
jcambers
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 686
Likes: 114
This is your first ACGM, so here're a few things for you to chew on:
1) Why would GMBT take both Freddy Andersson and John Gibson? One of them would have to be exposed to the Seattle expansion next year
2) Lucic has a No-Movement Clause (NMC). Do you think he would waive it to go to Ottawa?
3) Rasmus Andersson is our future Giordano. Are you sure you want to give that up for a goalie you'll only have for a year?
Sep. 14, 2020 at 11:03 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 389
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Gaudreau trade is awful, a goalie can be acquired for much less.
Ottawa trade is extremely unrealistic.
Leafs trade is also bad, why would you trade Ras for a rental goalie? Especially after getting Gibson who is way better.
Hamonic should most certainly not be receiving a contract
No chance Jankowski is qualified
Oh and you are out of cap space and 3 players short of a full roster


Except Gibson is considered a top 5 goalie in the league and it would take 15 years for the ducks to find another gem like him. That is a fair price for Gibson
Sep. 14, 2020 at 11:05 a.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Mangiapane Goat
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 281
Likes: 186
Quoting: jslongo
Please tell me your name is from a xTech video lmao

" The Better Tkachuk "


lol no. I like Matthew over brady, sooooo this came naturally.
TheCoontniac liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll