SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Trades

(MIN/BUF) - Staal for Johansson

Who won the trade?
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:12 p.m.
#26
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
Quoting: Hedman77
makes zero sense for Minnesota to do this.
- worse player
- higher cap hit
- makes the positional gap even worse


Like I get moving on from an aging Staal. But like why not trade for futures and get the cap relief? This makes no sense for them.
OldNYIfan and Djenthallman liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:12 p.m.
#27
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,072
Likes: 12,828
What a terrible move for the wild
OldNYIfan and weirfanno1 liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:12 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 698
Likes: 679
Where's the option for both teams losing this trade? Stall won't be a long-term solution for the Sabres and Mojo is yet another mid-6 forward for the Wild, which is the least of their concern.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:13 p.m.
#29
Chiggy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 590
How were the Penguins and Jim "I'll keep trying to find a third line center" Rutherford not completely all over Staal if he was available for so cheap?
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:14 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Skinner, Kahun, Jokiharju... Start the trend!


sure they won the skinner trade, but they followed it up with a horrible contract. hard to count skinner in buffalo as a net positive
jasondomitrovic and Chigurrhh liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:14 p.m.
#31
Bo Horvat enjoyer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 10,711
Likes: 11,932
I see Paul Fenton is still the GM of the Wild
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:14 p.m.
#32
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,612
Likes: 5,207
Quoting: DSZ
Plot Twist: Eric Staal forgot to put Buffalo on his no trade list and retires


And BUF still wins the trade.
OldNYIfan, AndrewLadd, Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan and 1 other person liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:14 p.m.
#33
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,595
Likes: 6,727
Quoting: mhockey91
sure they won the skinner trade, but they followed it up with a horrible contract. hard to count skinner in buffalo as a net positive


The trade was good, contract was rough.
mhockey91 liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:15 p.m.
#34
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Chigurrhh
How were the Penguins and Jim "I'll keep trying to find a third line center" Rutherford not completely all over Staal if he was available for so cheap?


he would've been a good fit. even though I assume a decline in staal next year, he still should be good for 40 ish points.
Chigurrhh and OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:15 p.m.
#35
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,841
Likes: 5,810
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Doesn’t seem like that’s the case:





I think Stunned is the reaction most people are having. Ha ha.
Kotkaniemi15 and OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:16 p.m.
#36
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Johansson is not a center yet...





This has to be a precursor to another trade. Johansson is a clear downgrade from Staal
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:22 p.m.
#37
What in tarnation
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 32,709
Likes: 31,449
What the f*ck is Guerin doing??
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:24 p.m.
#38
hey look a squirrel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 6,052
Likes: 3,754
This makes no sense for Minnesota, Johansson is a best as winger and Staal is top6 C.

W
T
F
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:24 p.m.
#39
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,507
Likes: 6,514
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
It’s an encouraging sign for the Sabres that someone has a no trade list without them on it.

Jokes aside, this is a good deal for the Sabres. They get a good player that can play C behind Eichel.

This is interesting for the Wild, though. Does this mean that they are trading for a C, or are they just planning for to take Staal’s spot?


Quoting: mnwild1790
WHAT?!?!?!?!?!


Quoting: DSZ
Plot Twist: Eric Staal forgot to put Buffalo on his no trade list and retires


Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
Doesn’t seem like that’s the case:





If he retires I am officially dropping the sabres asy favorite team...but this is a huge trade if he plays for us! I think it makes us alot better definitely a contender with a few more moves.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:28 p.m.
#40
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
I seem to remember Friedman saying that Eric Staal had previously chosen his no trade list so that he had the lowest chance of getting traded, by including the 10 good teams he would think would be interested in him. If that’s still the case with how he picked his teams, it appears to have backfired.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:28 p.m.
#41
torontos finest
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,560
Likes: 11,192
Think just about everything has already been addressed. Absurd trade for Minnesota.
OldNYIfan and Trickster liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:31 p.m.
#42
GM67
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 688
Likes: 316
Quoting: Hedman77
makes zero sense for Minnesota to do this.
- worse player
- higher cap hit
- makes the positional gap even worse


They Got younger and that's what they wanted.
jpsnow13 liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:32 p.m.
#43
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2019
Posts: 6,103
Likes: 2,240
When was the last time the Wild made a good signing or trade? The organisation is a dumpster fire
habs_fan123 liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:32 p.m.
#44
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
LMFAO I wonder what us Cap Friendly patrons would say if this trade was even suggested in an Buffalo ACGM. I guarantee that it wouldn’t be pretty.

The only reason I can see behind this trade is if Staal specifically wanted out of Minnesota and Buffalo was the only team MIN was allowed to trade him to, that actually wanted him.


With what Staal still brings and his meager cap hit finding a trade partner would of been easy - there's more to this story -
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:34 p.m.
#45
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,124
Likes: 1,640
Quoting: Chigurrhh
How were the Penguins and Jim "I'll keep trying to find a third line center" Rutherford not completely all over Staal if he was available for so cheap?


Cause he has the 2022 1st rnd pick to rid himself of and even the wild were like come on Jimmy that's crazy
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:42 p.m.
#46
habs_fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 690
minny got butt ****ed
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:43 p.m.
#47
Hakuna Matata
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 33,980
Likes: 20,940
Minnesota must want the #1oa next season cause they could have done better
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:46 p.m.
#48
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 246
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
I seem to remember Friedman saying that Eric Staal had previously chosen his no trade list so that he had the lowest chance of getting traded, by including the 10 good teams he would think would be interested in him. If that’s still the case with how he picked his teams, it appears to have backfired.


same happened with Phaneuf a few years ago.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:48 p.m.
#49
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 349
Likes: 246
So when dealing with Pittsburgh:
Well I know we really need that center, but given his injury history, and the flat cap, we just can't afford $4.1M, so we would need you guys to hold back half his salary, and even then we want some conditions on that 7th to make sure we aren't giving it away for nothing.

Dealing with Buffalo:
You mean it!! we can have that busted up 40 point winger? And he only makes $4.5M.... Yeah, take our best center, what do we need him for, we just got one off Pittsburgh anyway
UpsideDownQue liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 6:52 p.m.
#50
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 349
Likes: 246
Quoting: Chigurrhh
Like I get moving on from an aging Staal. But like why not trade for futures and get the cap relief? This makes no sense for them.


For sure, I think moving Staal was a must, but he had so much value. He's a cup winning, gold medal winning, big center on a sweetheart deal with 1 year left, and has put up high end 2nd line center numbers over the last 4 years. Contenders would certainly pay something pretty nice for Staal as a rental. Instead they got back a player who is roughly the same calibre as the guy they just paid a conditional 7th for with 50% salary retention. That's insanely dumb.
Chigurrhh and OldNYIfan liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit