SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks Acquire Danault in Fair Deal with Realistic and Competitive Roster

Created by: CheechYou
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 17, 2020
Published: Sep. 17, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Draft Protections
FORWARDS
1. Couture
2. Hertl
3. Meier
4. Labanc
5. Kane
6. Smith
7 . Danault
DEFENSE
1. Vlasic
2. Karlsson
3. Simek
GOALIE
1. Jones

This leaves Burns to be chosen by Seattle in the expansion draft, which frees up 8mil for both Danault and Hertl's extensions (the year after next for Tomas), with some leftover change coupled with other collected change (i.e. Smith's 4.5mil contract ending the same year as Hertl's extension) to make a solid 2nd pairing RD signing.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,700,000
2$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$800,000
2$4,500,000
1$1,000,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Lundqvist, Henrik
1$1,250,000
Trades
SJS
  1. Danault, Phillip
Additional Details:
Sign and Extension (6.5mil/yr over 4yrs)
MTL
  1. Roy, Jérémy [RFA Rights]
  2. Sörensen, Marcus
  3. 2021 1st round pick (SJS)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$73,832,499$0$665,000$7,667,501

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,083,333$3,083,333
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$763,333$763,333 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 3
Lundqvist, Henrik
$1,250,000$1,250,000
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 17, 2020 at 2:53 p.m.
#1
NoWah49
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 4,865
Likes: 1,432
I may soon be wrong, but I think this is still holding on to the hope of a contender. Trading another 1st is so risky imo
Sep. 17, 2020 at 2:54 p.m.
#2
You know nothing JS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,036
Likes: 4,429
Not quite yet for Danault. No interest in LW.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 3:01 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,013
Likes: 733
Quoting: NoWah49
I may soon be wrong, but I think this is still holding on to the hope of a contender. Trading another 1st is so risky imo


I personally think this roster is highly competitive next year, especially refreshed coming out of that long break.

But whether or not they actually are/are not competitive is a bit irrelevant. SJ and DW are forced to try and be competitive next year because of the way their roster is built and constructed, with age/prime of existing players and the relatively immovable contracts.

The reason this deal makes too much sense to me is because it acquires another key prime piece in Danault and it leaves Burns to be expendable and selected in the draft after next season to hugely adjust SJ's roster problems [in very DW fashion, I might add (i.e. "we love Burnzie and what he means for this organization but the reality is unfortunately we live in a salary-cap business yada...")], in addition to Smith coming off the books in time for Hertl's extension.

From MTL's perspective, the package deal is a good one for Danault. French-RD borderline 1st/2nd round prospect in Roy (who's stock, granted, fell when he got badly injured a few years ago but by all accounts he's worked hard and is fully healed and played great hockey in a full season last season) and a 1st round pick, with 1yr of a cost-controlled 3rd liner in Sorensen who chips in with ~15 goals and PKs great and plays 2nd unit PP a nice bit of icing.
NoWah49 liked this.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 3:05 p.m.
#4
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 12,817
Montreal doesn’t bite on that unfortunately
Also you didn’t even protect Danault?
Sep. 17, 2020 at 3:08 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,013
Likes: 733
Quoting: yikes
Also you didn’t even protect Danault?


Shoot thx I missed that. Updated now.
yikes liked this.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 3:13 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 477
Likes: 39
Montreal wouldn't accept that trade and it looks like the O'Reilly trade that Buffalo got bent over in. Also, I don't know how you can hope to be competitive with Martin Jones starting.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll