SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Revamp

Created by: FlameOn
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 17, 2020
Published: Sep. 17, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$950,000
2$1,000,000
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$7,750,000
2$2,000,000
4$5,250,000
1$800,000
3$1,500,000
2$950,000
2$1,250,000
Trades
1.
ARI
  1. Hanifin, Noah
  2. Lucic, Milan
  3. Mangiapane, Andrew [RFA Rights]
  4. 2020 1st round pick (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. 2020 4th round pick (WSH)
3.
CGY
  1. 2020 5th round pick (MIN)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$76,174,166$0$882,500$5,325,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
$7,750,000$7,750,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$950,000$950,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 6
$5,250,000$5,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 17, 2020 at 5:02 p.m.
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,106
Likes: 25,023
Let's assume for the sake of argument that Mangiapane is adequate compensation for assuming the grotesque burden of Milan Lucic and his contract. That leaves Hanifin and the first. You'll have a tough time convincing me that they're enough to get you Ekman-Larsson.
Comrade liked this.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 5:10 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Take out mangiapane and it’s close, oels contract is worse than lucics contract
Sep. 17, 2020 at 5:15 p.m.
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,106
Likes: 25,023
Quoting: flamesfan
Take out mangiapane and it’s close, oels contract is worse than lucics contract


What do contracts have to do with anything? Ekman-Larsson is still a top-4 defenseman; Lucic is a bad fourth-liner. Are you confusing Oliver Ekman-Larsson for Brent Seabrook?
Sep. 17, 2020 at 5:26 p.m.
#4
Who adds what?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 13,677
Likes: 2,703
Rittich for a 4th? That's gonna have takers.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 5:26 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,243
Likes: 19,510
Quoting: OldNYIfan
What do contracts have to do with anything? Ekman-Larsson is still a top-4 defenseman; Lucic is a bad fourth-liner. Are you confusing Oliver Ekman-Larsson for Brent Seabrook?


Bad take, he is far from a bad 4th liner he is a very solid 3rd/4th liner that is absurdly overpaid
Sep. 17, 2020 at 5:27 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Quoting: OldNYIfan
What do contracts have to do with anything? Ekman-Larsson is still a top-4 defenseman; Lucic is a bad fourth-liner. Are you confusing Oliver Ekman-Larsson for Brent Seabrook?


The past few years OEL has been horrible he has been worse than most defensmen in the league
Sep. 17, 2020 at 5:36 p.m.
#7
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,106
Likes: 25,023
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Bad take, he is far from a bad 4th liner he is a very solid 3rd/4th liner that is absurdly overpaid


Well, all I can say is he's been awful in every game he's played against my two crummy local teams. He's Nic DesLauriers without the speed.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 5:44 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,243
Likes: 19,510
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Well, all I can say is he's been awful in every game he's played against my two crummy local teams. He's Nic DesLauriers without the speed.


Ducks and kings games arent relevant enough. Flames play offer vs them as teams naturally. Lucic had a 7.6 GAR this season and a positive corsi. His contract sucms but hes still an NHLer by every measure. Reaves caliber at worse
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 5:48 p.m.
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,106
Likes: 25,023
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Ducks and kings games arent relevant enough. Flames play offer vs them as teams naturally. Lucic had a 7.6 GAR this season and a positive corsi. His contract sucms but hes still an NHLer by every measure. Reaves caliber at worse


Fair enough. You see him often enough to have better insight than me and I value the quality and integrity of your opinions.
Ledge_And_Dairy liked this.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 6:05 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 43
Likes: 6
Quoting: flamesfan
Take out mangiapane and it’s close, oels contract is worse than lucics contract


If the coyotes are to take lucic’s contract than we can easily afford OEL. It’s a price to pay to get rid of Lucic and strengthen our Defence. Plus it opens up a spot in our top 6 to sign Hall.

Quoting: OldNYIfan
Let's assume for the sake of argument that Mangiapane is adequate compensation for assuming the grotesque burden of Milan Lucic and his contract. That leaves Hanifin and the first. You'll have a tough time convincing me that they're enough to get you Ekman-Larsson.


Like Ledge_And_Dairy mentioned Lucic hasn’t been terrible, he’s a fairly solid 3rd liner who’s just overpaid. I do think That’s a good price to pay for OEL, they get a good top 4 dman at a low cost and ditch OEL’s contract. Plus I think they’re pretty desperate to add a 1st round pick.

Quoting: Eli
Rittich for a 4th? That's gonna have takers.


Why not? He’s a solid 1B option for the Caps who’s can easily afford it with Holtby gone and it takes some pressure off of Samsonov.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 6:09 p.m.
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,106
Likes: 25,023
Quoting: FlameOn
Like Ledge_And_Dairy mentioned Lucic hasn’t been terrible, he’s a fairly solid 3rd liner who’s just overpaid. I do think That’s a good price to pay for OEL, they get a good top 4 dman at a low cost and ditch OEL’s contract. Plus I think they’re pretty desperate to add a 1st round pick.


Okay, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 7:37 p.m.
#12
Who adds what?
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 13,677
Likes: 2,703
Quoting: Eli
Rittich for a 4th? That's gonna have takers.


Quoting: FlameOn

Why not? He’s a solid 1B option for the Caps who’s can easily afford it with Holtby gone and it takes some pressure off of Samsonov.


You mean if they can't sign Holtby? And if Samsonov is healthy after missing the playoffs with an undisclosed injury? And if the half dozen proven starting goalies whose teams are letting them test the free agent market don't call Washington first, and get in a negative bidding war?

Rittich is a very good goalie. In a normal year, you could get a 2nd round pick for him. But look at all the UFA goalies out there this year.

If there's a Rittich to WSH deal, the return is likely Panik.

If the goal is to trade him for a pick and cap space, there's a Buffalo fan who wants that deal, but also thinks the team will find a spot to move Hutton's contract.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 11:04 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 43
Likes: 6
Quoting: Eli
You mean if they can't sign Holtby? And if Samsonov is healthy after missing the playoffs with an undisclosed injury? And if the half dozen proven starting goalies whose teams are letting them test the free agent market don't call Washington first, and get in a negative bidding war?

Rittich is a very good goalie. In a normal year, you could get a 2nd round pick for him. But look at all the UFA goalies out there this year.

If there's a Rittich to WSH deal, the return is likely Panik.

If the goal is to trade him for a pick and cap space, there's a Buffalo fan who wants that deal, but also thinks the team will find a spot to move Hutton's contract.


Yeah it’s looking likely that Holtby doesn’t stay in washington(and in this suggestion I have Holtby signing in Calgary anyway)

All injuries were unspecified this playoffs because of Covid if I recall correctly. Just ‘unfit to play’. I can’t see washington wanting to sign any high profile UFA goalie and having faith in Samsonov goin forward. Getting a solid 1B like Rittich on a short term deal would solidify their goaltending position.

I would think Calgary is likely to trade Rittich for cap spce(if they do trade him) so that’s why I said for the 4th. Could they get a better pick? Maybe. Who knows.
Sep. 18, 2020 at 1:14 a.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 20
Likes: 4
Absolutely a no from the Caps, good luck with Holtby.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll