SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canucks fans thoughts

Created by: NeverEndingMisery
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 20, 2020
Published: Sep. 20, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Reports are Vancouver is looking to rebuild their defence and coach green is not a fan of virtanen.
For Calgary they have a logjam on the leftside of the defence and could use an upgrade at fwd.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
2$2,750,000
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
15$81,500,000$58,876,666$0$457,500$22,623,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 20, 2020 at 11:23 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,293
Likes: 19,540
Flames are not in a position to be trading away any defense
Sep. 20, 2020 at 11:28 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames are not in a position to be trading away any defense

I mean we have Gio Hanifin Valimaki Mackey on the left side and Kylington is the only one that is unsigned (even though he is an RFA). I think Virtanen is worth the risk.
NeverEndingMisery liked this.
Sep. 20, 2020 at 11:31 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,293
Likes: 19,540
Quoting: Alfie11
I mean we have Gio Hanifin Valimaki Mackey on the left side and Kylington is the only one that is unsigned (even though he is an RFA). I think Virtanen is worth the risk.


Mackey is unproven and I fully expect 1 of Valimaki or Kylington (likely Valimaki) to be switched to the right side. Also the 11-7 strat is likely going to become the norm. I have no issues with the value from a Flames perspective but I dont think Flames are in a position to trade defense for wingers
Sep. 20, 2020 at 11:35 p.m.
#4
CGY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 5,544
Likes: 2,066
I doubt VAN says yes.

There could be a chance VAN non-tenders Virtanen, if his ask is too high and they can't make a deal. The opportunity could exist to get him for free
Sep. 20, 2020 at 11:39 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Mackey is unproven and I fully expect 1 of Valimaki or Kylington (likely Valimaki) to be switched to the right side. Also the 11-7 strat is likely going to become the norm. I have no issues with the value from a Flames perspective but I dont think Flames are in a position to trade defense for wingers

I mean if we resign Brodie or Gustafsson I’d prefer them play the right on the 2nd pair, or we get DeMelo or smth, and 3rd pair guys are a dime a dozen. Basically I’m saying we need a 2RD and I don’t trust Kylington there, and 3RD can be anyone, Treliving loves getting depth D (good chance we keep Stone for cheap, and we still have Yelesin for example) so I think we’ll be fine on D. Like if we traded Kyl and kept Stone and got Brodie/Gus/Hanonic/DeMelo for 2RD we’d still have a top 8 I’d be fine starting the year with
Sep. 20, 2020 at 11:39 p.m.
#6
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: ItWasIn
I doubt VAN says yes.

There could be a chance VAN non-tenders Virtanen, if his ask is too high and they can't make a deal. The opportunity could exist to get him for free


Nucks say no to nice D prospect for a guy they may not qualify???
NeverEndingMisery liked this.
Sep. 20, 2020 at 11:41 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 1,170
AS A CANUCKS FAN I DONT SEE MUCH CHANCE OF US TRADING JAKE TO A RIVAL.IF HE BLOSSEMS INTO THE POWER FORWARD HE CAN BE ITS GONNA BE IN THE EAST.IN MY OPINION. THERE IS ZERO CHANCE HE WILL BE NON TENDERED THATS BAD CAP MANAGEMENT JIM WOULD BE FIRED.
Sep. 20, 2020 at 11:47 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,293
Likes: 19,540
Quoting: Alfie11
I mean if we resign Brodie or Gustafsson I’d prefer them play the right on the 2nd pair, or we get DeMelo or smth, and 3rd pair guys are a dime a dozen. Basically I’m saying we need a 2RD and I don’t trust Kylington there, and 3RD can be anyone, Treliving loves getting depth D (good chance we keep Stone for cheap, and we still have Yelesin for example) so I think we’ll be fine on D. Like if we traded Kyl and kept Stone and got Brodie/Gus/Hanonic/DeMelo for 2RD we’d still have a top 8 I’d be fine starting the year with


Thats a lot of if's, if we sign a bunch of UFA defense then yes he is expendable, otherwise he's not.
Sep. 20, 2020 at 11:50 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Thats a lot of if's, if we sign a bunch of UFA defense then yes he is expendable, otherwise he's not.

I mean we need a 2RD regardless, keeping or trading Kylington doesn't affect that. I'm fine with Mackey-Yelesin being the 4th pair, which only leaves us with a 3RD to get, and those are everywhere (like I said, we could just keep Stone or Gus for that, and there are plenty of UFAs we could get for that too so it's not a big deal either). I think if the trade is right Kylington is expendable, and I'd take the risk on a potential 20 goal right shot guy
NeverEndingMisery liked this.
Sep. 20, 2020 at 11:55 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 146
Likes: 30
Quoting: remowilliams
AS A CANUCKS FAN I DONT SEE MUCH CHANCE OF US TRADING JAKE TO A RIVAL.IF HE BLOSSEMS INTO THE POWER FORWARD HE CAN BE ITS GONNA BE IN THE EAST.IN MY OPINION. THERE IS ZERO CHANCE HE WILL BE NON TENDERED THATS BAD CAP MANAGEMENT JIM WOULD BE FIRED.


chill with the caps bro
Sep. 20, 2020 at 11:59 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 1,170
Quoting: NeverEndingMisery
chill with the caps bro


why what difference does that make.not really your business how i type on here really.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 12:04 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 146
Likes: 30
Quoting: remowilliams
why what difference does that make.not really your business how i type on here really.


Typically caps are reserved for yelling so I don't know why you'd be yelling that 😂 Also no need to get so defensive lol
Sep. 21, 2020 at 12:08 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 1,170
Quoting: NeverEndingMisery
Typically caps are reserved for yelling so I don't know why you'd be yelling that 😂 Also no need to get so defensive lol


BRO IM NOT YELLING im iust typing my opinion. how i do it is up to ME not YOU.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 12:11 a.m.
#14
Best In The World
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 658
VAN is not moving Virtanen to a division rival.
remowilliams liked this.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 12:13 a.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,884
Likes: 6,389
Canucks don't really need any LD prospects with Rathbone and Juolevi already pushing to make the team. I also don't like the idea of trade Virtanen to a division rival unless it's an overpay
remowilliams and brocklesnar liked this.
Sep. 21, 2020 at 12:21 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,293
Likes: 19,540
Quoting: Alfie11
I mean we need a 2RD regardless, keeping or trading Kylington doesn't affect that. I'm fine with Mackey-Yelesin being the 4th pair, which only leaves us with a 3RD to get, and those are everywhere (like I said, we could just keep Stone or Gus for that, and there are plenty of UFAs we could get for that too so it's not a big deal either). I think if the trade is right Kylington is expendable, and I'd take the risk on a potential 20 goal right shot guy


we have a 3 RD, Kylington/Valimaki. Thinking otherwise is old fashioned. People play on the off hand all the time
Sep. 21, 2020 at 12:23 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 9,527
Likes: 8,968
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
we have a 3 RD, Kylington/Valimaki. Thinking otherwise is old fashioned. People play on the off hand all the time

My point is we can acquire another guy to play a satisfactory 3RD, and we have the UFA rights to 2 of them right now. A physical, potential 20 goal middle 6 winger is much more rare
Sep. 21, 2020 at 2:16 a.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 146
Likes: 30
Quoting: Alfie11
My point is we can acquire another guy to play a satisfactory 3RD, and we have the UFA rights to 2 of them right now. A physical, potential 20 goal middle 6 winger is much more rare


agreed
Sep. 21, 2020 at 2:16 a.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 146
Likes: 30
Quoting: remowilliams
BRO IM NOT YELLING im iust typing my opinion. how i do it is up to ME not YOU.


like i said before.. chill out bro
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll