SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

helping NYR out kinda

Created by: jonnymc26
Team: 2020-21 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 23, 2020
Published: Sep. 23, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
instead of a buy out why not just trade some assets you dont need to get some cap space.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,000,000
5$4,000,000
3$2,500,000
3$7,000,000
3$800,000
3$800,000
3$800,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Andersson, Lias
  2. Lundqvist, Henrik
  3. 2020 3rd round pick (NYR)
  4. 2020 3rd round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
NYR pays out any bonus or pay for Lund, buffalo just takes the cap hit. He does not play for buffalo
NYR
2.
BUF
  1. Gostisbehere, Shayne
  2. 2020 7th round pick (MTL)
Additional Details:
all players involved seem to not be in the future plans for the team. so hockey trade and hope for best
PHI
  1. Montour, Brandon [RFA Rights]
  2. Pilut, Lawrence [RFA Rights]
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the MTL
2021
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$70,012,500$1,487,500$5,187,500$11,487,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,625,000$1,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$800,000$800,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$845,000$845,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,875,000$3,875,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$637,500$638K)
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 23, 2020 at 1:11 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Buf says no on both
Sep. 23, 2020 at 1:16 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 172
Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
Buf says no on both


free assets with only cap cost when team has self imposed 70m$ cap. I dont see the negative if i am kevin.(other then cheap owners)
supposedly they might not qualify montour so that would be a positive to get something back for him too.
Sep. 23, 2020 at 1:42 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,133
Likes: 14,147
Quoting: jonnymc26
free assets with only cap cost when team has self imposed 70m$ cap. I dont see the negative if i am kevin.(other then cheap owners)
supposedly they might not qualify montour so that would be a positive to get something back for him too.


12 million dollars to players not playing in the NHL is unfathomable.
Sep. 23, 2020 at 2:26 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,728
Likes: 1,559
Yeah a lot fundamentally wrong with the Rangers trade

1) He has a NMC. He’s not waiving for Buff
2) He’d be the best of your 3 goaltenders not sure why you’d bury him
3) Rangers would just retain instead of adding picks.
Sep. 23, 2020 at 8:50 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Quoting: jonnymc26
free assets with only cap cost when team has self imposed 70m$ cap. I dont see the negative if i am kevin.(other then cheap owners)
supposedly they might not qualify montour so that would be a positive to get something back for him too.


They squashed the rumour about montour and taking back that much cao should be rewarded by more than couple of 3rds and a long shot
Sep. 24, 2020 at 12:08 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 172
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
12 million dollars to players not playing in the NHL is unfathomable.


so i kinda put in the comments that nyr are going to pay out Lundqvist contract then trade him to buffalo to take cap hit.
I don't know the rules well enough to know if that can happen but thats the idea.
for okpo if team sends him down they save over 1m$, witch they then put out a below million dollar player in saving money.
looks bad on paper but better with some details
Sep. 24, 2020 at 12:10 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 172
Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
They squashed the rumour about montour and taking back that much cao should be rewarded by more than couple of 3rds and a long shot


well not getting nyr 1st, but i think if nyr pays all the contract then trades them makes it more worth it for sabers.
Sep. 24, 2020 at 12:12 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 172
Quoting: Sagecoll
Yeah a lot fundamentally wrong with the Rangers trade

1) He has a NMC. He’s not waiving for Buff
2) He’d be the best of your 3 goaltenders not sure why you’d bury him
3) Rangers would just retain instead of adding picks.


1 he doesn't play for sabers says in the comments
2 he still doesn't play for sabers
3 rangers want cap space and have deep prospect pool so dont need the picks as much
Sep. 24, 2020 at 12:13 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 974
Quoting: jonnymc26
well not getting nyr 1st, but i think if nyr pays all the contract then trades them makes it more worth it for sabers.


I'm not after 1oa lol.
But car 1st. Or another prospect.
Also even if it isn't real money that money taken up completely stymies any progress buf can make. And they can't afford to suck again and not get rewarded for it
Sep. 26, 2020 at 1:15 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
buffalofan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 172
Quoting: RoyalBlueSabres
I'm not after 1oa lol.
But car 1st. Or another prospect.
Also even if it isn't real money that money taken up completely stymies any progress buf can make. And they can't afford to suck again and not get rewarded for it


i am very much convinced that ownership has a 70m$ cap for the team in real $.
so my main idea on this was using that cap space for something.
brings in extra picks and boom or bust player in Anderson. rather then just siting on it.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll