SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What Would It Take

Created by: EhRobin3
Team: 2020-21 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 27, 2020
Published: Sep. 27, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I'm not saying this happens or that Montreal should pursue it I'm just curious what it would take to get these 2 picks if you included a trade down. Would what I proposed be close at all or no?
Trades
MTL
  1. 2020 1st round pick (VAN)
  2. 2020 1st round pick (ARI)
Additional Details:
*Assuming they wanted to take a LD with one of these picks anyways
NJD
  1. Mete, Victor [RFA Rights]
  2. Struble, Jayden [Reserve List]
  3. 2020 1st round pick (MTL)
  4. 2020 2nd round pick (STL)
  5. 2021 3rd round pick (CHI)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the OTT
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
19$81,500,000$65,997,976$0$3,137,500$15,502,024
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,083,333$3,083,333
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,800,000$4,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,400,000$2,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,350,000$4,350,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 27, 2020 at 3:40 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 1,486
they're not moving both unless it's for a high end top 6F or top 4D, this trade is garbage for NJ
Sep. 27, 2020 at 3:52 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 114
Likes: 30
Quoting: zyyyp
they're not moving both unless it's for a high end top 6F or top 4D, this trade is garbage for NJ


In essence, you are only losing one of the picks as you still have a pick in the same round except you now have more choices towards who you pick, and as I stated it's assuming you were going to pick a LD with one of the picks and now you have 2 young LD who could potentially be that top 4 defender.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 3:59 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 340
Likes: 103
Quoting: zyyyp
they're not moving both unless it's for a high end top 6F or top 4D, this trade is garbage for NJ


I hope they don't trade any of the picks. Hate to say it, but that strategy didn't really work for the team with Schneider, Palmieri, or Gusev, even though they are all [or were in Cory's case] really good players. Maybe try an offer sheet with next year's picks.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 4:20 p.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,871
Likes: 1,299
Quoting: zyyyp
they're not moving both unless it's for a high end top 6F or top 4D, this trade is garbage for NJ


Dude you need reading comprehension. There’s barely any movement on the picks. Talk about an overreaction

These trades happen literally dozens of times at the draft table every year 😂
Jo_Habs77 liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 4:45 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 947
Quoting: OlegP
Dude you need reading comprehension. There’s barely any movement on the picks. Talk about an overreaction

These trades happen literally dozens of times at the draft table every year 😂


I can't remember anytime something like this happened

it is one thing to trade a pick to move up a few spots but that is not what is going on here

last year Ariz paid 45OA to move from 14 to 11, So assuming that value for 18 to 15 (should be less)

you are essentially asking to trade 45oa, 57oa, a 3rd rd pick and and 2 players with little value for the 20oa pick

tell me any example in the past 15 years something like that happened
Sep. 27, 2020 at 4:58 p.m.
#6
25th coming up
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 658
Likes: 268
What's even the point here? Who do you want MTL to target with those picks?
Cause you're losing a roster player and the team's most promising 2nd round pick in a while (outside Romanov)
Sep. 27, 2020 at 5:10 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 114
Likes: 30
Quoting: Jo_Habs77
What's even the point here? Who do you want MTL to target with those picks?
Cause you're losing a roster player and the team's most promising 2nd round pick in a while (outside Romanov)


Ideally id like to target whoever is left of Jarvis Mercer Holloway Amirov or Gunler at 18 and Mysak at 20 also i personally don't see Struble as one of our top 3 LD prospects not that he isn't good I just like Norlinder and Harris more.
Jo_Habs77 liked this.
Sep. 27, 2020 at 6:30 p.m.
#8
25th coming up
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 658
Likes: 268
Quoting: EhRobin3
Ideally id like to target whoever is left of Jarvis Mercer Holloway Amirov or Gunler at 18 and Mysak at 20 also i personally don't see Struble as one of our top 3 LD prospects not that he isn't good I just like Norlinder and Harris more.


I wouldn't make that bet. I think you take the #16 pick for the player you want and leave it at that. I'd be fine for moving one of those 3 LD in a trade, I feel like one of them has to. But Harris might be the odd man out here, Norlinder is the new hope of elite skill, and Struble was one of the youngest players of his draft year and the only one who is 19yrs old (his B-day was like 3 weeks ago). Plus, remember when Bergy called him a "Greek god" Think of the potential memes!



Sep. 27, 2020 at 8:02 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 114
Likes: 30
Quoting: Jo_Habs77
I wouldn't make that bet. I think you take the #16 pick for the player you want and leave it at that. I'd be fine for moving one of those 3 LD in a trade, I feel like one of them has to. But Harris might be the odd man out here, Norlinder is the new hope of elite skill, and Struble was one of the youngest players of his draft year and the only one who is 19yrs old (his B-day was like 3 weeks ago). Plus, remember when Bergy called him a "Greek god" Think of the potential memes!





I'm aware I also did state I don't think Montreal should pursue this in the description, it was just an idea I had because I kinda like the idea of drafting Mysak but we are too high for it to be worth the reach. Also personally have our top 11 prospects ranked as:

1. Romanov
2. Caufield
3. Primeau
4. Norlinder
5. Ylonen
6. Poehling
7. Brooks
8. Fleury
9. Harris
10 Hillis
11. Struble
Jo_Habs77 liked this.
Sep. 28, 2020 at 7:11 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 282
2 secound rounders and mete and struble is a lot for a mid first and moving up a bit on our pick... Mete isn't nothing he is a puck moving defenseman who would play on most NHl teams....who had a good playoo=ff playing RD...you be lucky if that later ist turn into a player better than struble...habs pass
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll