SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Educate Me

Created by: TheWolfe
Team: 2020-21 Detroit Red Wings
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 29, 2020
Published: Sep. 29, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
So in this hypothetical scenario, ANA moves a contract to DET to free up cap space much like the Staal trade. Detroit then flips the player to OTT with 50% salary retention in return for an LTIR contract and swap late 1st and early 2nd round picks for the trouble.

My question is does this trade help Ottawa in:

A) Real money as Gudbranson's salary this year is $3M and Gáborík's is $3.075M but I do not know if his contract is insured.

B) Cap money as I don't think OTT is over the threshold to get LTIR relief from Gáborík's contract. Obviously retaining on Gudbranson's deal gets them further from the cap floor, but in this case they'd be trading dead money for a player who can still take the ice.

Thanks for any info and have a great day!
Trades
1.
DET
  1. Gudbranson, Erik
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (ANA)
ANA
    Future Considerations
    2.
    DET
    1. Gáborík, Marián
    2. 2020 1st round pick (NYI)
    OTT
    1. Gudbranson, Erik ($2,000,000 retained)
    2. 2020 2nd round pick (DET)
    Buyouts
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the NYI
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    2021
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the NYR
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the VGK
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    2022
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    Logo of the DET
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    16$81,500,000$59,500,000$0$0$22,000,000
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $6,100,000$6,100,000
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Ottawa Senators
    $4,875,000$4,875,000
    RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $2,950,000$2,950,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $6,083,333$6,083,333
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    C, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $3,850,000$3,850,000
    C, LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    C, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $1,800,000$1,800,000
    C, RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $850,000$850,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $5,700,000$5,700,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $875,000$875,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $750,000$750,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Sep. 29, 2020 at 1:35 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,139
    Likes: 5,943
    Ducks tell Yzerman to f off, Guddy was really solid in ANA, easily worth 4M for a team that doesnt need to shed cap, especially at the cost of any asset let alone the 36OA pick
    AGKH123 liked this.
    Sep. 29, 2020 at 1:38 p.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    NoCupsForCanada
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2018
    Posts: 544
    Likes: 557
    Quoting: Salzy
    Ducks tell Yzerman to f off, Guddy was really solid in ANA, easily worth 4M for a team that doesnt need to shed cap, especially at the cost of any asset let alone the 36OA pick


    Not what I was asking for but thanks for your input
    will9739 liked this.
    Sep. 29, 2020 at 1:40 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,139
    Likes: 5,943
    Quoting: TheWolfe
    Not what I was asking for but thanks for your input


    Well seeing how the whole thread hinges on that trade I would say its necessary
    AGKH123 liked this.
    Sep. 29, 2020 at 1:42 p.m.
    #4
    Watches no games
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 3,268
    Likes: 976
    Anaheim would never pay you to take on that contract. Ottawa might do a deal to swap Gaborik for somebody making similar money / cap who can actually play, but that would benefit the other team and is something they would get a return, rather than paying, for.
    AGKH123 liked this.
    Sep. 29, 2020 at 1:43 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    NoCupsForCanada
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2018
    Posts: 544
    Likes: 557
    My Kingdom for someone who would answer the question(s) asked.

    Also, trade thread on the move that landed him in Anaheim seems to imply he's a boat anchor https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/279698
    Sep. 29, 2020 at 1:47 p.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    NoCupsForCanada
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2018
    Posts: 544
    Likes: 557
    Quoting: MelonVK
    Anaheim would never pay you to take on that contract. Ottawa might do a deal to swap Gaborik for somebody making similar money / cap who can actually play, but that would benefit the other team and is something they would get a return, rather than paying, for.


    Then insert Kris Russell if that's what you're hung up on. The original trade isn't the point of the thread. As if it wasn't completely predictable that posters on here would get hung up on the wrong thing though
    Sep. 29, 2020 at 1:49 p.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 5,139
    Likes: 5,943
    Quoting: TheWolfe
    My Kingdom for someone who would answer the question(s) asked.

    Also, trade thread on the move that landed him in Anaheim seems to imply he's a boat anchor https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/279698


    That fails to account for how he played in ANA, which was very well. He is hardly an anchor, especially on a rebuilding team, Ducks could easily get something back for him, and they surely wouldnt need to pay to move him
    AGKH123 liked this.
    Sep. 29, 2020 at 1:52 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 932
    Likes: 320
    Quoting: TheWolfe
    My Kingdom for someone who would answer the question(s) asked.

    Also, trade thread on the move that landed him in Anaheim seems to imply he's a boat anchor https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/279698


    Answer your question with this question,

    Why does Detroit even need to be involved here?

    Gudbranson has a $4M cap hit and $3M in salary due.

    Ottawa can take it directly as they have to meet the cap floor, and LTIR Gaborik, paying him a big fat $0.

    So what advantage does Ottawa have for being involved in this?
    Sep. 29, 2020 at 2:25 p.m.
    #9
    Watches no games
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 3,268
    Likes: 976
    Quoting: TheWolfe
    Then insert Kris Russell if that's what you're hung up on. The original trade isn't the point of the thread. As if it wasn't completely predictable that posters on here would get hung up on the wrong thing though


    Yeah and I'm poking a hole into that idea, because Ottawa would want a return, not pay a pick, for exchanging the Gaborik contract for an active player on a poor contract.
    Sep. 29, 2020 at 3:00 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2019
    Posts: 3,534
    Likes: 1,238
    OTT declines.

    Melnyk loves the Gaborik contract.

    Not going to pay to get rid of it
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll