SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

moves will be made

Created by: Sabrebluehs
Team: 2020-21 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 30, 2020
Published: Sep. 30, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,600,000
2$4,500,000
1$800,000
1$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$1,400,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
Trades
1.
TBL
  1. Kakko, Kaapo
  2. 2020 1st round pick (CAR)
2.
TBL
  1. Myers, Philippe [RFA Rights]
PHI
  1. Palat, Ondrej
  2. 2020 3rd round pick (PHI)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the TBL
2021
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NJD
2022
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$78,999,999$0$3,150,000$2,500,001
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,166,666$5,166,666
C, LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,800,000$1,800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$900,000$900,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,650,000$1,650,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$900,000$900,000
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
G
UFA - 8
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,600,000$1,600,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,300,000$1,300,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 30, 2020 at 6:59 a.m.
#1
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2018
Posts: 18,595
Likes: 6,727
Not trading Kakko. Especially for Cirelli. He's not that special.
ALitteral liked this.
Sep. 30, 2020 at 7:01 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 117
Likes: 55
hope you dont think the rangers would even consider that. Its been 1 year they certainly arent going to give up on him yet.
Sep. 30, 2020 at 7:08 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 596
Likes: 328
Look a try your lineup. You want a 23 year old RHD that you slot into your top pair for a 29 year old LW. The Flyers have 4 LW that would be above Palat on the depth chart (Giroux, JVR, Lindlom, Farabee). Try again.
Sep. 30, 2020 at 8:09 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 335
Likes: 83
Smoking the good stuff, are we now?
Sep. 30, 2020 at 8:42 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 230
I think ur missing Sergachev and some other pieces in that Rangers trade
Sep. 30, 2020 at 9:13 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 395
Likes: 79
Maybe Kakko, Strome and 22 OA for Sergechev, Palat, Cirelli and 2 1sts. And that's a huge maybe.
Sep. 30, 2020 at 9:14 a.m.
#7
Boi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 379
Why would we trade one of the best defensive players in the league for the worst
Sep. 30, 2020 at 10:01 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 230
Quoting: Bigboi69
Why would we trade one of the best defensive players in the league for the worst


Thats a pretty good joke bud.
Sep. 30, 2020 at 10:27 a.m.
#9
Boi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 379
Quoting: TheDime99
Thats a pretty good joke bud.


It’s literally not cirellis is the best defensive player under 26 he was 4th in selke voting and is the next Bergeron/kopitar, and kakko had the worst defense this season by a rookie in history
Sep. 30, 2020 at 12:44 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 230
Quoting: Bigboi69
It’s literally not cirellis is the best defensive player under 26 he was 4th in selke voting and is the next Bergeron/kopitar, and kakko had the worst defense this season by a rookie in history


Its called a rookie season for a reason not everyone can come running out the gate some players take time, if u want to read more about it u can use the link. Notice how Stamkos was on the list thats because he was so bad that he almost got traded to the Rangers. And now look at him, u can't put too much wait behind the first season

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesportster.com/hockey/15-nhl-superstars-who-were-terrible-in-their-debut-season/amp/
Sep. 30, 2020 at 1:25 p.m.
#11
Boi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 379
Kakko had a horrible GF/60, xGF/60,CF/60,xGA/60 and CA/60 the only place where he wasn’t a liability was the pp, stamkos was producing in his rookie season but they used plus minus which is the most useless stat possible
Sep. 30, 2020 at 1:26 p.m.
#12
Boi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 379
Quoting: TheDime99
Its called a rookie season for a reason not everyone can come running out the gate some players take time, if u want to read more about it u can use the link. Notice how Stamkos was on the list thats because he was so bad that he almost got traded to the Rangers. And now look at him, u can't put too much wait behind the first season

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesportster.com/hockey/15-nhl-superstars-who-were-terrible-in-their-debut-season/amp/



2
Kakko had a horrible GF/60, xGF/60,CF/60,xGA/60 and CA/60 the only place where he wasn’t a liability was the pp, stamkos was producing in his rookie season but they used plus minus which is the most useless stat possible
Sep. 30, 2020 at 1:47 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 230
Quoting: Bigboi69
2
Kakko had a horrible GF/60, xGF/60,CF/60,xGA/60 and CA/60 the only place where he wasn’t a liability was the pp, stamkos was producing in his rookie season but they used plus minus which is the most useless stat possible


So let me see if I get the point ur making, since Kakko was terrible in his first season he's a bust not worth anything. And will not improve at all, is that how it works with every pick in the draft. Oh if they struggle in year one we cut ties because he can't get any better
Sep. 30, 2020 at 1:50 p.m.
#14
Boi
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 379
Quoting: TheDime99
So let me see if I get the point ur making, since Kakko was terrible in his first season he's a bust not worth anything. And will not improve at all, is that how it works with every pick in the draft. Oh if they struggle in year one we cut ties because he can't get any better

No I’m saying his trade value is very low rn
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll