SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

pool of prospects rank by position

Created by: yanleg96
Team: 2020-21 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 7, 2020
Published: Oct. 8, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
So here's my top 5 of each position of habs prospect pool. The order is NOT how close they are to be in the nhl but its more about the potential. This is my opinion but comments if you disagree and why.

Also tell me who would you be willing to trade in case you have to make a trade for an establish guy next year if you a to do a good package.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
3$700,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$900,000
Trades
1.
2.
3.
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2022
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the STL
2023
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
29$81,500,000$26,138,331$0$4,537,500$55,361,669
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
LW
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RW, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
RW, LW
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
C, RW
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
LW
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$838,333$838,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
C, LW, RW
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$763,333$763,333
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
C, LW, RW
RFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
RFA - 5
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$880,833$880,833
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$771,666$771,666 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$900,000$900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$700,000$700,000
G
RFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 8, 2020 at 12:08 a.m.
#1
PittsburghModelMyAss
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 1,430
Would have Mysak over Tuch if you're going by potential. Not sure Vejdemo will be anything more than an AHLer either unfortunately. Sean Farrell will most likely NOT be a Center in the NHL at 5'8'', so I would have him ahead of RH-P at LW. Other than that it looks perfect.
yanleg96 liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 12:17 a.m.
#2
PittsburghModelMyAss
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 1,430
I'm also very curious to see where Joel Teasdale fits in. Hopefully he can get over his injuries and return to form. He and RH-P could form a decent top line in Laval next year and rekindle their chemistry from Rouyn-Noranda. They could become servicable 4th liners on the Habs one day.
yanleg96 liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 12:21 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
LW : RHP shouldn’t be there / Teasdale before him / Pitlick have more potential than both RHP and Teasdale
C : Poehling have wayyy more potential than Evans / Hillis more potential than Evans / Evans is NHL ready but will be a 4C/4RW
RW : Fair enough
LHD : Norlinder #1 Romanov #2 Guhle #3 Struble #4 Harris #5
RHD : Brook #1 Juulsen #2 Fleury #3
Those ranking are in terms of potential, not who’s more NHL ready
yanleg96 liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 12:24 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,628
Likes: 6,499
Quoting: GMs
LW : RHP shouldn’t be there / Teasdale before him / Pitlick have more potential than both RHP and Teasdale
C : Poehling have wayyy more potential than Evans / Hillis more potential than Evans / Evans is NHL ready but will be a 4C/4RW
RW : Fair enough
LHD : Norlinder #1 Romanov #2 Guhle #3 Struble #4 Harris #5
RHD : Brook #1 Juulsen #2 Fleury #3
Those ranking are in terms of potential, not who’s more NHL ready


Guhle prefers the right side much like Brodie therefore the he jumps to the top of the RHD depth chart IMO.

RHD: Guhle #1 Brook #2 Juulsen #3 Fleury #4
yanleg96 and GMs liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 12:27 a.m.
#5
PittsburghModelMyAss
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 1,430
Quoting: GMs
LW : RHP shouldn’t be there / Teasdale before him / Pitlick have more potential than both RHP and Teasdale
C : Poehling have wayyy more potential than Evans / Hillis more potential than Evans / Evans is NHL ready but will be a 4C/4RW
RW : Fair enough
LHD : Norlinder #1 Romanov #2 Guhle #3 Struble #4 Harris #5
RHD : Brook #1 Juulsen #2 Fleury #3
Those ranking are in terms of potential, not who’s more NHL ready


Idk man, Josh Brook looks to be nothing more than a bottom pairing AHL'er. Granted he's still young and at 21 we don't need to rush him because Petry and Weber ain't going anywhere. But such high hopes for the guy and yet his development just hasn't really been there.
yanleg96 liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 12:34 a.m.
#6
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 7,888
Likes: 3,256
Luch Tuke
BigBadBurke, yanleg96 and GMs liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 12:41 a.m.
#7
PittsburghModelMyAss
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 1,430
@GMs @Campabee have either of you guys heard anything on Bergy possibly signing Cam Hillis' linemate Pavel Gogolev? He was eligible for 2020 draft (and ranked 79th on Craig Button's list) but went undrafted probably because he's an overager... would be great to pair him up with Cam in Laval imo.
yanleg96 liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 12:42 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 18
Pretty accurate but Ikonen and juulsen its been almost 2 year they dont play becaus of injury so they dont have much potentiel in my head juulsen still have some because he was nhl ready but those head and eyes injury its hard to come back after this long evens is more nhl ready but poehling has more potentiel hes still a 1pick it was is 1year at pro level he need time To adjust but im not over this guys yet still hopefull he will reach something like a 3center in a stanleycup team maybe 2 in a bad team
yanleg96 and GMs liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 12:53 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 58
Likes: 18
Quoting: TheGHANDI90
Idk man, Josh Brook looks to be nothing more than a bottom pairing AHL'er. Granted he's still young and at 21 we don't need to rush him because Petry and Weber ain't going anywhere. But such high hopes for the guy and yet his development just hasn't really been there.


Brooks it was is first year as a pro playing vs junior player and ahl is not the same give him another year ahl before you say that he had 75 pts 2year ago in is last junior year the guy has some hockey in him défense take more time also but he need a really good season this year that for sure
yanleg96 and GMs liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 1:52 a.m.
#10
Rak Wraithraiser
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 152
Likes: 83
Quoting: Mastermath9
Brooks it was is first year as a pro playing vs junior player and ahl is not the same give him another year ahl before you say that he had 75 pts 2year ago in is last junior year the guy has some hockey in him défense take more time also but he need a really good season this year that for sure


I'd also like to add that Laval was meh this szn, they had a lot of players called up from Montreal and never really had a set lineup. (Evans, Hudon, Barber, Leskinen, Olofsson, Ouellet, Vejdemo, Alzner, Weise, Fleury, Folin, Primeau, Peca, Poehling and KK all spent some time in MTL). So it was kinda hard for them to really get something going. So maybe it wasn't the best year for Brook to showcase his skills, i wouldn't give up on him yet, but he's gonna need more szn before coming to MTL, if he indeed does.
GMs liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 2:29 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 14,042
Likes: 5,158
Quoting: GalchyTheBeast27
I'd also like to add that Laval was meh this szn, they had a lot of players called up from Montreal and never really had a set lineup. (Evans, Hudon, Barber, Leskinen, Olofsson, Ouellet, Vejdemo, Alzner, Weise, Fleury, Folin, Primeau, Peca, Poehling and KK all spent some time in MTL). So it was kinda hard for them to really get something going. So maybe it wasn't the best year for Brook to showcase his skills, i wouldn't give up on him yet, but he's gonna need more szn before coming to MTL, if he indeed does.


When you have Martineau Adam-Moisant in your lineup, you know it’s bad lmao
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll