SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Win Now Mode According to Murray

Created by: Stgstg55
Team: 2020-21 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 10, 2020
Published: Oct. 10, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,200,000
3$3,250,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. Manson, Josh
  2. Tracey, Brayden
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (ANA)
2.
ANA
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (WPG)
3.
ANA
    Waivers
    Buyouts
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the ANA
    2022
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the WPG
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the NSH
    2023
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    Logo of the ANA
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    20$81,500,000$68,730,500$0$0$12,769,500
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,463,139$2,463,139
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,456,250$1,456,250
    LW, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,875,000$5,875,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,700,000$1,700,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $8,250,000$8,250,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $863,333$863,333
    C, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,450,000$1,450,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $820,000$820,000
    LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    C, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $2,602,778$2,602,778
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $3,900,000$3,900,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,400,000$6,400,000
    G
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,500,000$6,500,000
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    $2,200,000$2,200,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    C, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Oct. 10, 2020 at 7:49 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2020
    Posts: 115
    Likes: 74
    The Boeser trade isn't too bad. Idk why we would sign Vatanen for a higher AAV and more term than what we just got Shattenkirk for, who is a better version of Vatanen. I'd be fine bringing Sami back at the right term/AAV, but not sure of the fit with guys like Shattenkirk, Djoos, and Curran in the line up already.
    Stgstg55 liked this.
    Oct. 10, 2020 at 7:50 p.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Xx_Zegras46_xX
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2019
    Posts: 3,960
    Likes: 1,658
    Quoting: DucksFan55
    The Boeser trade isn't too bad. Idk why we would sign Vatanen for a higher AAV and more term than what we just got Shattenkirk for, who is a better version of Vatanen. I'd be fine bringing Sami back at the right term/AAV, but not sure of the fit with guys like Shattenkirk, Djoos, and Curran in the line up already.


    What would you suggest? Maybe bring up Welenski?
    Oct. 10, 2020 at 8:00 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2020
    Posts: 115
    Likes: 74
    Quoting: HadesOfSoCal
    What would you suggest? Maybe bring up Welenski?


    So if we did the Boeser trade and thus didn't have Manson, I'd probably want essentially a cheaper Manson replacement (another physical defensive RHD). Because without Gudbranson and Manson there's really no one who's good in there own end besides Lindholm. Maybe a guy like Bogosian on a 1 year 1 mill deal? I wouldn't hate Vatanen back on around 2 years for 3ish, we'd just be very small/not physical/not great in our zone on the back end which wouldn't be great.

    The better solution is probably to grab a guy like Tyler Johnson or Virtanen if we really want a scoring RW or get another defensive RHD thrown in a Manson package. Personally, I'd rather deal a center or one of the LHD kids for a RW than Manson if we're trying to be good next year. If we're trying to acquire assets for future, different story though.
    Stgstg55 liked this.
    Oct. 10, 2020 at 10:47 p.m.
    #4
    Being wrong is ok
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2019
    Posts: 703
    Likes: 354
    I never had a problem with GMBM and respect the moves he made/makes. However, he is pulling up short on this rebuild. Like really? Playoffs? This team isn't ready.

    For the trades.

    I doubt we would trade real recent prospects. Earliest class I could see is 2017(Comtois) .

    Heinen helps a-lot. If we are trying to win now he's staying.

    Yea with Grant back we can trade Rowney. Dont care
    Stgstg55 liked this.
    Oct. 10, 2020 at 10:57 p.m.
    #5
    Best In The World
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 3,272
    Likes: 658
    VAN is not moving Boeser
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll