SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Who says no

Created by: BlindMilwaukee
Published: Oct. 11, 2020 at 3:02 p.m.
Salary Cap: $81,500,000
Season Days: 124/125 (99%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has been rejected because the cap hit of one of the teams is below the lower limit

Logo of the Calgary FlamesCalgary Flames

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Gaudreau, JohnnyCalgary FlamesNHL-$6,696,000111---0000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Brännström, ErikWaivers ExemptOttawa SenatorsLoan-$0011---0000--
Batherson, DrakeWaivers ExemptOttawa SenatorsNHL-$730,772111---0000--
Greig, RidlyWaivers ExemptOttawa SenatorsMinor-$0011---0000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$5,710,8341736573711
Change$5,965,228022000
Final$11,676,062 (↑)1738 (↑)59 (↑)3711000

Logo of the Ottawa SenatorsOttawa Senators

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Brännström, ErikWaivers ExemptOttawa SenatorsLoan-$0011---0000--
Batherson, DrakeWaivers ExemptOttawa SenatorsNHL-$730,772111---0000--
Greig, RidlyWaivers ExemptOttawa SenatorsMinor-$0011---0000--
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Gaudreau, JohnnyCalgary FlamesNHL-$6,696,000111---0000--
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$27,787,5011632593810
Change-$5,965,2280-2-2000
Final$21,822,273 (↓)1630 (↓)57 (↓)3810000
Oct. 11, 2020 at 3:05 p.m.
#1
BlindMilwaukee
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 75
Likes: 43
I’m brand new to this site but as a Flames fan I would like to move Johnny for future pieces while also making some cap space. Would the Sens say this too many pieces for a rebuilding team to give up? Would the Flames rather a full time NHLer?
Oct. 11, 2020 at 3:25 p.m.
#2
reelkena
Fanboys make bad Gms
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 2,084
Quoting: BlindMilwaukee
I’m brand new to this site but as a Flames fan I would like to move Johnny for future pieces while also making some cap space. Would the Sens say this too many pieces for a rebuilding team to give up? Would the Flames rather a full time NHLer?


I think Cgy would want a more locked in prospect and if they pitch that to Ottawa they would probably say no for now and wait until they were ready to compete for a playoff spot.
Oct. 11, 2020 at 3:37 p.m.
#3
Neiler
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 39
Likes: 5
Agreed. Ottawa wouldn't do this. They just spent a long time stockpiling youth and it'd be pretty foolish for them to move it out now. Call back in a few years. 🙂
Oct. 11, 2020 at 4:06 p.m.
#4
BlindMilwaukee
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 75
Likes: 43
Thanks for your replies, in your own opinions would swapping Brannstrom for a 2021 1st rounder do anything for Ottawa? I think you guys are right though. This is likely a no from both teams haha.
Oct. 11, 2020 at 4:43 p.m.
#5
Creagentuirc
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 419
Likes: 105
I do not think that Ottawa have interest in this. Branstrom is part of the future and the main return for Mark Stone so they are not giving up on him.
Oct. 11, 2020 at 5:17 p.m.
#6
hockey_GoDz
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 281
Likes: 30
dorian crumbles a piece of paper into the mic.. sry ur breaking up.. bye..
calagary tries to call back. and gets operator says sorry this number is no longer in service. please check the number or try again later.
Oct. 12, 2020 at 10:20 a.m.
#7
PLDGEY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 1,238
OTT rejects in a heartbeat.

OTT traded Stone for Brannstrom and Stone >/= to Gaudreau.
Oct. 12, 2020 at 10:23 a.m.
#8
sensibleguy
Serf
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 3,417
Likes: 1,461
Quoting: BlindMilwaukee
Thanks for your replies, in your own opinions would swapping Brannstrom for a 2021 1st rounder do anything for Ottawa? I think you guys are right though. This is likely a no from both teams haha.


Ottawa likes Brannstrom, and can use Brannstrom, but might move on from him in the next 1-2 years. They have five defencemen drafted in the 1st rounds that are 23 or younger.

Chabot, 2015 #18 overall
Brannstrom 2017 #15 overall
Bernard-Docker, 2018 #26 overall
Lassi Thomson, 2019 #19 overall
Jake Sanderson 2020/#5 overall

The thing is, they also have #4OA Tkachuk and #3OA Stutzle on the left side, and people can argue where Stutzle will end up, but at $6.75MM, Gaudreau needs to be playing top line minutes. That's a lot of left hand shots, and Ottawa's most promising right shot, Batherson, is going the other way.

I think Gaudreau is just a bit old for this team, as a top line player. The top lines need to be the younger, dynamic guys that are entering their prime when Ottawa begins to compete. Teams with older top line guys aren't coming out of a rebuild.
BlindMilwaukee liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll