SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Post Seattle Draft

Created by: Whiskerz
Team: 2021-22 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 12, 2020
Published: Oct. 12, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
3$3,275,000
1$925,000
2$1,650,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,250,000
2$1,175,000
Trades
SJS
    Seattle selects Radim Simek in expansion draft
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    2022
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the MIN
    2023
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$63,730,362$0$1,707,500$17,769,638
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,108,696$2,108,696
    LW, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $3,275,000$3,275,000
    LW, C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $4,725,000$4,725,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    C
    UFA
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $1,650,000$1,650,000
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $750,000$750,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $925,000$925,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $1,175,000$1,175,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LD/RD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $5,280,000$5,280,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $925,000$925,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
    RD
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $725,000$725,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $900,000$900,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Oct. 12, 2020 at 8:15 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 418
    Likes: 225
    Betting that we expose Burns in hopes of getting out from some long-term money and in order to give Merkley an increased role. Burns is still a great to elite player, but there are other roster needs and as we've seen cap space is hard to come by right now.

    Based on all analyses of their statistics in junior and draft position and stuff, Merkley is projected to be even better than Quinn Hughes and should already be in the NHL at this point. Going to be hard to keep a guy with that amount of talent in a limited 3rd pairing role with minimal PP time because of Burns and Karlsson. Equally, it's going to be hard to justify paying Burns that kind of money when there are other roster needs like the forward group.
    Oct. 12, 2020 at 9:38 p.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2018
    Posts: 1,879
    Likes: 653
    Quoting: SJS2212
    Going to be hard to keep a guy with that amount of talent in a limited 3rd pairing role with minimal PP time because of Burns and Karlsson. Equally, it's going to be hard to justify paying Burns that kind of money when there are other roster needs like the forward group.


    Were you actually thinking about Vince Dunn and the Blues when you typed the above, 'cause I couldn't have typed it any better than this. Just fill in Dunn for Merkley and Petro for the guy "hard to justify paying that kind of money when" we have forward needs as well.
    Oct. 12, 2020 at 11:47 p.m.
    #3
    Thread Starter
    SJS Tanking fan
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 579
    Likes: 201
    Quoting: SJS2212
    Betting that we expose Burns in hopes of getting out from some long-term money and in order to give Merkley an increased role. Burns is still a great to elite player, but there are other roster needs and as we've seen cap space is hard to come by right now.

    Based on all analyses of their statistics in junior and draft position and stuff, Merkley is projected to be even better than Quinn Hughes and should already be in the NHL at this point. Going to be hard to keep a guy with that amount of talent in a limited 3rd pairing role with minimal PP time because of Burns and Karlsson. Equally, it's going to be hard to justify paying Burns that kind of money when there are other roster needs like the forward group.


    I would bet on a trade before him getting exposed to Seattle.
    Oct. 13, 2020 at 8:30 a.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2018
    Posts: 418
    Likes: 225
    Quoting: Whiskerz
    I would bet on a trade before him getting exposed to Seattle.

    We’ve seen it all offseason. Moving good players making lots of money is virtually impossible without taking money back (which defeats the purpose in this case). Burns is a perfect pick for Seattle as it gives them a face of the franchise with personality and a few years of good play left in him.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll