SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tampas best shot at winning and having a future

Created by: Jukinators
Team: 2020-21 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 13, 2020
Published: Oct. 13, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,250,000
3$4,500,000
1$825,000
Trades
1.
TBL
  1. 2021 5th round pick (DET)
DET
  1. Johnson, Tyler
  2. Katchouk, Boris
  3. 2021 7th round pick (NJD)
2.
TBL
  1. 2021 1st round pick (NYR)
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (NYR)
NYR
  1. Cirelli, Anthony [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Rangers will probably try to offer sheet Cirelli but Tampa will match and then trade w rangers as they know they are interested and get rid of money
3.
TBL
  1. 2021 4th round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Coburn, Braydon
  2. 2021 5th round pick (DET)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NSH
2022
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
2023
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$80,404,166$0$500,000$1,095,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$8,500,000$8,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$825,000$825,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,800,000$1,800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,166,666$5,166,666
C, LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,650,000$1,650,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$737,500$737,500
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
G
UFA - 8
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,300,000$1,300,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 13, 2020 at 7:00 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 851
Likes: 139
rangers can't offersheet him. they don't have the cap. after they re-sign the rfa's they will be close to the limit. they would have to move out deangelo or storme to make the trade happen.
Oct. 13, 2020 at 7:03 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 401
I struggle to see why Sergachev would sign that deal, even if the final year of the contract was $8M to set the floor for his next extension. I think even $6.75M is conservative for the quality of hockey he plays right now, and it seems unlikely (even in the old boys GM club) that Sergachev wouldn't have an offer sheet on his desk for $6.75M AAV or more, longer term.

$4.5M would be one of the most team-friendly deals in a long time. Maybe bump it to $5.33M AAV x 3 years, with the following structure:

Year 1: $5.0M
Year 2: $2.5M
Year 3: $8.5M (sets floor for next contract)

I could see this being interesting. Gives Serg 3 years with the core group largely intact. 3 good shots at another Cup(s) before more big changes are required.
Oct. 13, 2020 at 7:20 p.m.
#3
Blue
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 86
Likes: 38
There's no way the Wings accept that deal. They could have had Johnson for free over the weekend a 'meh' prospect isn't going to the move the needle.
Oct. 13, 2020 at 7:31 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 727
Quoting: Tkachinla
I struggle to see why Sergachev would sign that deal, even if the final year of the contract was $8M to set the floor for his next extension. I think even $6.75M is conservative for the quality of hockey he plays right now, and it seems unlikely (even in the old boys GM club) that Sergachev wouldn't have an offer sheet on his desk for $6.75M AAV or more, longer term.

$4.5M would be one of the most team-friendly deals in a long time. Maybe bump it to $5.33M AAV x 3 years, with the following structure:

Year 1: $5.0M
Year 2: $2.5M
Year 3: $8.5M (sets floor for next contract)

I could see this being interesting. Gives Serg 3 years with the core group largely intact. 3 good shots at another Cup(s) before more big changes are required.


Quoting: Tkachinla
I struggle to see why Sergachev would sign that deal, even if the final year of the contract was $8M to set the floor for his next extension. I think even $6.75M is conservative for the quality of hockey he plays right now, and it seems unlikely (even in the old boys GM club) that Sergachev wouldn't have an offer sheet on his desk for $6.75M AAV or more, longer term.

$4.5M would be one of the most team-friendly deals in a long time. Maybe bump it to $5.33M AAV x 3 years, with the following structure:

Year 1: $5.0M
Year 2: $2.5M
Year 3: $8.5M (sets floor for next contract)

I could see this being interesting. Gives Serg 3 years with the core group largely intact. 3 good shots at another Cup(s) before more big changes are required.




NHL got rid of last year for qualifying offer on new contracts.. It’s now cap number.
Tkachinla liked this.
Oct. 13, 2020 at 7:35 p.m.
#5
MK458
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 928
Quoting: Tkachinla
I struggle to see why Sergachev would sign that deal, even if the final year of the contract was $8M to set the floor for his next extension. I think even $6.75M is conservative for the quality of hockey he plays right now, and it seems unlikely (even in the old boys GM club) that Sergachev wouldn't have an offer sheet on his desk for $6.75M AAV or more, longer term.

$4.5M would be one of the most team-friendly deals in a long time. Maybe bump it to $5.33M AAV x 3 years, with the following structure:

Year 1: $5.0M
Year 2: $2.5M
Year 3: $8.5M (sets floor for next contract)

I could see this being interesting. Gives Serg 3 years with the core group largely intact. 3 good shots at another Cup(s) before more big changes are required.


McAvoy took 4.9x3 in Boston and Werenski took 5.0x3 in Columbus, both are comparables and the cap was the exact same when they signed. And I'd argue that both those players are slightly better than Sergachev. I don't think this contract is that far fetched
Oct. 13, 2020 at 11:28 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 727
Quoting: mk458
McAvoy took 4.9x3 in Boston and Werenski took 5.0x3 in Columbus, both are comparables and the cap was the exact same when they signed. And I'd argue that both those players are slightly better than Sergachev. I don't think this contract is that far fetched


The contract is very good. The last year won’t up his qualifying offer though. It’s now the average each year now.
Jun. 26, 2023 at 1:33 a.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 673
Likes: 90
Quoting: Tkachinla
I struggle to see why Sergachev would sign that deal, even if the final year of the contract was $8M to set the floor for his next extension. I think even $6.75M is conservative for the quality of hockey he plays right now, and it seems unlikely (even in the old boys GM club) that Sergachev wouldn't have an offer sheet on his desk for $6.75M AAV or more, longer term.

$4.5M would be one of the most team-friendly deals in a long time. Maybe bump it to $5.33M AAV x 3 years, with the following structure:

Year 1: $5.0M
Year 2: $2.5M
Year 3: $8.5M (sets floor for next contract)

I could see this being interesting. Gives Serg 3 years with the core group largely intact. 3 good shots at another Cup(s) before more big changes are required.


I was pretty close he signed for 4.8
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll