SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Year 2 Shed Cap

Created by: Canucks33
Team: 2021-22 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 21, 2020
Published: Oct. 21, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,250,000
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
1$750,000
2$2,750,000
2$2,250,000
2$975,000
2$1,750,000
2$800,000
2$950,000
8$10,500,000
8$9,500,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (ARI)
Additional Details:
Street
NJD
  1. Roussel, Antoine
  2. Virtanen, Jake [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Trade made in previous offseason
2.
VAN
    Expansion Draft considerations
    ANA
    1. McDonough, Aidan [Reserve List]
    2. Myers, Tyler
    3. 2021 3rd round pick (VAN)
    4. 2021 3rd round pick (ARI)
    Additional Details:
    The Canucks pay Seattle to take Myers in the Expansion draft. He's the best player that will be available from the Canucks anyway.
    3.
    VAN
      Future considerations
      OTT
      1. Eriksson, Loui
      2. Keppen, Ethan [Reserve List]
      3. 2021 2nd round pick (VAN)
      Additional Details:
      Canucks pay any team with cap space to take one year of Eriksson. Based on the Staal trade from this year but with a little bit of extra value since Eriksson is worse.
      4.
      MIN
      1. 2022 2nd round pick (VAN)
      2. 2023 2nd round pick (VAN)
      Additional Details:
      The Canucks will be in a position to add a defenseman before the Expansion draft. Some teams will have extra players that they can't protect, so they may be available. It might not necessarily be Dumba and it might not be this price, but a defenseman can be added through trade. Dumba is just a placeholder for now. Other candidates include Graves/Toews, Foote/Cernak, Gardiner/Bean, etc.
      Recapture Fees
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2021
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      2022
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      2023
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      Logo of the VAN
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      23$81,500,000$75,650,659$648,780$1,050,000$5,849,341

      Roster

      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $5,250,000$5,250,000
      C, LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $10,500,000$10,500,000
      C, LW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $5,875,000$5,875,000
      RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
      LW, RW
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $4,125,000$4,125,000
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $925,000$925,000
      RW, LW
      RFA - 3
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $3,500,000$3,500,000
      LW, RW
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $2,250,000$2,250,000
      C, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $825,000$825,000
      RW, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $1,225,000$1,225,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $975,000$975,000
      RW, LW
      UFA
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $800,000$800,000
      RW
      RFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $9,500,000$9,500,000
      LD
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Minnesota Wild
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      RD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $2,000,000$2,000,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $1,750,000$1,750,000
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $5,950,000$5,950,000
      LD/RD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $1,250,000$1,250,000
      LD
      RFA
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $950,000$950,000
      RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $2,750,000$2,750,000
      G
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
      LD
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
      $750,000$750,000
      RD
      UFA - 1

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Oct. 21, 2020 at 2:03 p.m.
      #1
      alwaysnextyear
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 5,494
      Likes: 1,549
      Nice work, I like it. Although I take issue with one thing you've outlined regarding the expansion draft; Holtby will likely be the best selection option for Seattle, not Myers. He's a better player, on a cheaper, shorter contract. The one thing that may work in the Canucks favor on this is the amount of other good goalies that will be available to Seattle, but Holtby would be a very low-risk pick for them.

      But I do like the idea of sending the Kraken some draft capital to make Myers the selection instead if they don't mind taking his contract.
      Oct. 21, 2020 at 2:07 p.m.
      #2
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2017
      Posts: 3,179
      Likes: 1,068
      Quoting: alwaysnextyear
      Nice work, I like it. Although I take issue with one thing you've outlined regarding the expansion draft; Holtby will likely be the best selection option for Seattle, not Myers. He's a better player, on a cheaper, shorter contract. The one thing that may work in the Canucks favor on this is the amount of other good goalies that will be available to Seattle, but Holtby would be a very low-risk pick for them.

      But I do like the idea of sending the Kraken some draft capital to make Myers the selection instead if they don't mind taking his contract.


      I was thinking that there would be better goalies with more terms available either through the Expansion draft itself, trade or Free Agency. Myers is a decent player, just overpaid. If Seattle goes defense heavy like Vegas did, I could see him being of interest. They can move him with retention if they want.
      Oct. 21, 2020 at 2:09 p.m.
      #3
      alwaysnextyear
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 5,494
      Likes: 1,549
      Quoting: Canucks33
      I was thinking that there would be better goalies with more terms available either through the Expansion draft itself, trade or Free Agency. Myers is a decent player, just overpaid. If Seattle goes defense heavy like Vegas did, I could see him being of interest. They can move him with retention if they want.


      True, I just think Seattle won't be doing the Canucks any cap favors by selecting Myers unless VAN pays them to do it, like you've laid out here.
      Oct. 21, 2020 at 2:11 p.m.
      #4
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2017
      Posts: 3,179
      Likes: 1,068
      Quoting: alwaysnextyear
      True, I just think Seattle won't be doing the Canucks any cap favors by selecting Myers unless VAN pays them to do it, like you've laid out here.


      Fair, I definitely would not expect them to take that contract for free. I think it would be worth it to give up assets to move that contract though and the Expansion draft is as good of an opportunity as we will get.
      Oct. 21, 2020 at 2:53 p.m.
      #5
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jan. 2019
      Posts: 966
      Likes: 335
      in a full season Myer would have had 24-28 points... a small dip from the previous year and all of VAN want to ship him out.... we are much to hard on new players
      all of his other stats improved over 15 fewer games.... more blocked shots, more hits, more take-aways and less give-aways, he also started more d-zone that o-zone over previous years... sure his cap hit may seem touch to swallow but with he is what VAN needs right now big, tough and defensively responsible.

      IMO VAN should be looking to protect Myers in the expansion draft
      Jim_Benning_Almost liked this.
      Oct. 21, 2020 at 2:54 p.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2020
      Posts: 1,173
      Likes: 697
      I think the amounts that Pettersson and Hughes are being signed for are on the high side. Not because they're not worth it, but because we'll be coming off of another COVID season and as a result a flat cap once again. My gut feel says Petey gets $9-$9.5M and Hughes gets $7 - $7.5M, but term might be 3 years instead, keeping them as RFAs once again. I also don't see Juolevi getting the ice time to show that a $1.75M contract is warranted...but that's minor at best.

      I like that you show the Eriksson and Roussel contracts being dumped without giving up a #1 draft choice, although I don't know the OTT and MIN offers will be enough to get what you want. Maybe they would like Jay Beagle too!! Bwahahahaha!!!
      Oct. 21, 2020 at 3:34 p.m.
      #7
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2017
      Posts: 3,179
      Likes: 1,068
      Quoting: canucks_Fan_53
      in a full season Myer would have had 24-28 points... a small dip from the previous year and all of VAN want to ship him out.... we are much to hard on new players
      all of his other stats improved over 15 fewer games.... more blocked shots, more hits, more take-aways and less give-aways, he also started more d-zone that o-zone over previous years... sure his cap hit may seem touch to swallow but with he is what VAN needs right now big, tough and defensively responsible.

      IMO VAN should be looking to protect Myers in the expansion draft


      Myers is by no means a bad player. He is definitely an NHL defensemen and would make most if not all defense cores in the NHL better. The problem is that he was dropped down to the 3rd pairing for the second half of the year and never worked his way back up. Green trusted Stetcher more than him. 6M is too much for a 3rd pairing defenseman. On Seattle, he would likely play in the top-4 again and provide positive value for them.

      Myers' previous stats were from the Jets teams that had Trouba and Byfuglien on them. I wouldn't read too much into his stats improving since he was given more opportunity here.

      The main reason for moving Myers is cap flexibility. Nothing more.
      Oct. 21, 2020 at 3:47 p.m.
      #8
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Dec. 2017
      Posts: 3,179
      Likes: 1,068
      Quoting: Jim_Benning_Almost
      I think the amounts that Pettersson and Hughes are being signed for are on the high side. Not because they're not worth it, but because we'll be coming off of another COVID season and as a result a flat cap once again. My gut feel says Petey gets $9-$9.5M and Hughes gets $7 - $7.5M, but term might be 3 years instead, keeping them as RFAs once again. I also don't see Juolevi getting the ice time to show that a $1.75M contract is warranted...but that's minor at best.

      I like that you show the Eriksson and Roussel contracts being dumped without giving up a #1 draft choice, although I don't know the OTT and MIN offers will be enough to get what you want. Maybe they would like Jay Beagle too!! Bwahahahaha!!!


      Pettersson's contract definitely isn't high. Pettersson has been slightly more productive and slightly healthier than Eichel, who signed for 13.33% of the cap. The same percentage applied now puts Pettersson at 10.86M and Pettersson could reasonably ask for more than that. Hughes is tougher to gauge, but I think he could be higher than Chabot at 8M. Obviously it depends on if its a bridge deal or a long term deal.

      If we have to add more to the Ottawa trade then I expect it wouldn't be much. The Wild deal is just a placeholder for any defenseman the Canucks could acquire before the Expansion draft, pay no attention to the value of the deal.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll