5 goalies seems a bit overkill, but sure. 5 is better than 2.

Ok what was the rationale for not starting Ferraro? I'd rather we went for a more solid 3rd RD like Rutta at the same price. Also I love the Jones hate lmao

Please don't tell me the 5 goalies concept is not a troll

Nope. Read the description

I know I read the description. I just don't get how this pans out. Maybe 3 goalies at the most would be perhaps feasible, but guys like Anderson and Schneider aren't gonna sign deals where they know they're likely gonna be AHL backups or even AHL 3rd strings.

We already have Zach Sawchenko in the AHL as well as Melnichuk and Korenar. It wouldn't make sense to let these guys all battle it out in training camp after the Sharks already went out and got the guy they wanted in Dubnyk (for whatever silly reason).

Schneider and Anderson are both very washed up and injury prone, and Melnichuk is nowhere near ready for NHL ice time. If we didn't have Dubnyk and our AHL goalie situation wasn't great I might understand but that's just not the case.

Sign as many bad goalies as you want. Unless they let you play two of them at the same time it's not gonna help much.

Roster limit of 23. And you really played Koekkoek and Vlasic over Ferraro?