SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Yzerplan

Created by: csick
Team: 2020-21 Detroit Red Wings
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 5, 2020
Published: Nov. 6, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$900,000
Trades
1.
DET
  1. Brink, Bobby [Reserve List]
  2. van Riemsdyk, James
  3. 2021 4th round pick (PHI)
PHI
  1. Hirose, Taro
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (VGK)
2.
DET
  1. Johnson, Tyler
  2. 2021 1st round pick (TBL)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the DET
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
2022
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
2023
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$72,430,556$0$1,007,500$9,069,444
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$6,100,000$6,100,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,950,000$2,950,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$714,166$714,166 (Performance Bonus$157,500$158K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,600,000$3,600,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$5,700,000$5,700,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,700,000$1,700,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,000,000$3,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$875,000$875,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$850,000$850,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,850,000$3,850,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$6,083,333$6,083,333
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$900,000$900,000
LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 6, 2020 at 11:29 a.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 33,053
Likes: 8,999
3 x $7M for JVR take more then Brink and a 4th round pick to move that contract.
Nov. 6, 2020 at 11:30 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,690
Likes: 23,820
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
3 x $7M for JVR take more then Brink and a 4th round pick to move that contract.


Brink is a very good prospect. JVR is overpaid but not a bad player by any stretch. Still good for 45-50 pts. The 2-2.5 mill of overpayment per year is what you’re getting Brink for
BStinson liked this.
Nov. 6, 2020 at 11:39 a.m.
#3
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,561
Likes: 8,255
Johnson or jvr not 12million of both for 3 more years
Nov. 6, 2020 at 11:57 a.m.
#4
Thread Starter
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,690
Likes: 23,820
Quoting: Jfstompers
Johnson or jvr not 12million of both for 3 more years


They’re good options for your 2nd line until your young players are ready and they can slide to the 3rd line. It won’t be an issue with the cap because you don’t have to re-sign Raymond or Seider for at least 4 years.
Nov. 6, 2020 at 12:17 p.m.
#5
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,915
Likes: 5,352
Lightning add a top major prospect. a first between 28-32 isn't enough to take 4 years of 5M+

Philly adds a gigantic piece and no 3rd going back. Jvr has a bloated Contract and we aren't taking it without a major piece

Yzerman is not helping any team out of Contract hell unless they way overpay. This isn't enough
Nov. 6, 2020 at 12:55 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,690
Likes: 23,820
Quoting: buffbry
Lightning add a top major prospect. a first between 28-32 isn't enough to take 4 years of 5M+

Philly adds a gigantic piece and no 3rd going back. Jvr has a bloated Contract and we aren't taking it without a major piece

Yzerman is not helping any team out of Contract hell unless they way overpay. This isn't enough


JVR and Johnson are good players that you could use. Johnson is overpaid by 1 million and JVR by 2-2.5 mill.
Nov. 6, 2020 at 1:02 p.m.
#7
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,915
Likes: 5,352
Quoting: csick
JVR and Johnson are good players that you could use. Johnson is overpaid by 1 million and JVR by 2-2.5 mill.


Not going to happen unless those teams massively overpay. We aren't helping teams out of their cap jams during this flat cap cost cutting era. If those teams want to dump those Contracts they are going to pay massive for it or keep them.

These moves are contradictory to every single thing yzerman has said and done thus far. For us to take those Contracts the teams must pay more then they are willing to or it's not worth it at all. Tj is frans Nielsen all over again and jvr has gotten worse everyear even benched in the playoffs and a few games this season. We aren't taking 30 year olds with long term Contracts unless the compensation is out of this world no way we can pass it up good. The price is high to take them and they won't get anything back except f prospects/futures
Nov. 6, 2020 at 1:21 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,690
Likes: 23,820
Quoting: buffbry
Not going to happen unless those teams massively overpay. We aren't helping teams out of their cap jams during this flat cap cost cutting era. If those teams want to dump those Contracts they are going to pay massive for it or keep them.

These moves are contradictory to every single thing yzerman has said and done thus far. For us to take those Contracts the teams must pay more then they are willing to or it's not worth it at all. Tj is frans Nielsen all over again and jvr has gotten worse everyear even benched in the playoffs and a few games this season. We aren't taking 30 year olds with long term Contracts unless the compensation is out of this world no way we can pass it up good. The price is high to take them and they won't get anything back except f prospects/futures


You guys should be the ones pushing for this way more than the other teams. Brink is a prospect that will be in your top 6 in 2 years and you’re getting short term players to fill those spots.
Nov. 6, 2020 at 1:39 p.m.
#9
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,915
Likes: 5,352
Quoting: csick
You guys should be the ones pushing for this way more than the other teams. Brink is a prospect that will be in your top 6 in 2 years and you’re getting short term players to fill those spots.


No thanks, brink isn't good enough and don't want any of these Contracts at all. We are building through the draft and have 0 use for these Contracts. Well just stay the course we are going now and not take these Contracts.

So ultimately wings pass on both trades
Nov. 6, 2020 at 1:41 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,690
Likes: 23,820
Quoting: buffbry
No thanks, brink isn't good enough and don't want any of these Contracts at all. We are building through the draft and have 0 use for these Contracts. Well just stay the course we are going now and not take these Contracts.

So ultimately wings pass on both trades


That’s good choose to suck for 5 more years and also lose Amo
Mantha over finishing the rebuild in 3 years . That’s really cool . And Brink is very good almost as good as Caufield
Nov. 6, 2020 at 1:45 p.m.
#11
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,915
Likes: 5,352
Quoting: csick
That’s good choose to suck for 5 more years and also lose Amo
Mantha over finishing the rebuild in 3 years . That’s really cool . And Brink is very good almost as good as Caufield


We won't suck for 5 more years, this is a bad take. Brink won't be better then anyone in our top 6. He's a W not taking bert, mantha, zadina or raymond's spot. We will be fine with our rebuild and these other teams can figure out a different way to dump those Contracts. No reason to get mad bud, this is just not the direction we are going.

It would cost frost + 1st to take jvr, would take bouliet or foote + first to take tj. No picks or prospects going back, this is how you you put a gun to a team that needs cap space in the worst ways head. If they won't pay then they can figure out how to be cap compliant without the wings
Nov. 6, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,690
Likes: 23,820
Quoting: buffbry
We won't suck for 5 more years, this is a bad take. Brink won't be better then anyone in our top 6. He's a W not taking bert, mantha, zadina or raymond's spot. We will be fine with our rebuild and these other teams can figure out a different way to dump those Contracts. No reason to get mad bud, this is just not the direction we are going.

It would cost frost + 1st to take jvr, would take bouliet or foote + first to take tj. No picks or prospects going back, this is how you you put a gun to a team that needs cap space in the worst ways head. If they won't pay then they can figure out how to be cap compliant without the wings


That’s cool. Have fun signing Mantha to 8 years in 4 years at 30 years old when you didn’t make the playoffs in those 4 years
Nov. 6, 2020 at 2:03 p.m.
#13
Buffbry
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 8,915
Likes: 5,352
Quoting: csick
That’s cool. Have fun signing Mantha to 8 years in 4 years at 30 years old when you didn’t make the playoffs in those 4 years


No prob pal, I'm sure we can work something out
Nov. 6, 2020 at 5:16 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 2,885
Quoting: buffbry
We won't suck for 5 more years, this is a bad take. Brink won't be better then anyone in our top 6. He's a W not taking bert, mantha, zadina or raymond's spot. We will be fine with our rebuild and these other teams can figure out a different way to dump those Contracts. No reason to get mad bud, this is just not the direction we are going.

It would cost frost + 1st to take jvr, would take bouliet or foote + first to take tj. No picks or prospects going back, this is how you you put a gun to a team that needs cap space in the worst ways head. If they won't pay then they can figure out how to be cap compliant without the wings


Pretty unrealistic to think James van Riemsdyk would require Morgan Frost and a 1st round pick to move him. He may be overpaid, but he can still score 20+ goals a season and produce 40-50 points a season. Philadelphia doesn't have an imperative to move JVR for cap purposes. Teams that intentionally do not make moves that are advantageous to them not only hurt their team, but allow other teams to make moves that are advantageous for them.
csick liked this.
Nov. 6, 2020 at 7:09 p.m.
#15
Pop Pop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 14,561
Likes: 8,255
Quoting: csick
They’re good options for your 2nd line until your young players are ready and they can slide to the 3rd line. It won’t be an issue with the cap because you don’t have to re-sign Raymond or Seider for at least 4 years.


No I know but id rather spend the money in other spots than say jvr. A longer solution at ld or even a forward like duclair.
csick liked this.
Nov. 6, 2020 at 7:12 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 42,690
Likes: 23,820
Quoting: Jfstompers
No I know but id rather spend the money in other spots than say jvr. A longer solution at ld or even a forward like duclair.


Yeah I can see why u think that. But I think your prospect pool could use some work. It has the quality, just missing a bunch of quantity in case some guys don’t pan out and to fill out the roster. This is a good way to do that
Nov. 7, 2020 at 5:42 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 465
Likes: 226
JVR and TJ are still useful players, but $12M a season for multiple seasons is not good value on a rebuilding team.
Considering that the Wings would only net one good prospect and a late 1st, neither of these trades are enticing enough to eliminate cap flexibility for the next 3 years.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll