SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My Top-10 Centers

Created by: CD282
Team: 2020-21 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 11, 2020
Published: Nov. 11, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Because why not? Everyone else is doing it. Here are the stats:

Top-15 by points over the past 2 years (and all situations IPP):
1. Draisaitl: 215 (77.62)
2. McDavid: 213 (80.38)
3. MacKinnon: 192 (73.85)
4. Stamkos: 164 (74.55)
5. Eichel: 160 (72.40)
6. Barkov: 158 (65.83)
7. Scheifele: 157 (63.31)
8. Point: 156 (62.15)
9. Matthews: 153 (74.63)
T10. Zibanejad: 149 (78.01)
T10. Aho: 149 (70.62)
12. Tavares: 148 (64.63)
13. Crosby: 147 (75.38)
14. Malkin: 146 (81.56)
15. Toews: 141 (63.23)
17. O'Reilly: 138 (66.67)
19. Couterier: 135 (63.68)

Top-15 by points/GP over the past 2 years:
1. McDavid: 1.50
2. Draisaitl: 1.41
3. MacKinnon: 1.27
4. Crosby: 1.23
5. Malkin: 1.19
6. Stamkos: 1.18
7. Matthews: 1.11
8. Eichel: 1.10
9. Point: 1.08
10. Zibanejad: 1.07
11. Bergeron: 1.07
12. Barkov: 1.07
13. Scheifele: 1.03
14. Tavares: 1.02
15. Aho: 0.99
20. Couterier: 0.91
21. O'Reilly: 0.90

Here are all the players listed above and their 5v5 GF% rel from the past 2 years:
Crosby: +11.03
O'Reilly: +10.99
Aho: +9.95
Point: +9.69
Draisaitl: +9.58
MacKinnon: +9.07
McDavid: +8.88
Bergeron: +8.74
Couterier: +7.81
Eichel: +7.64
Barkov: +6.76
Zibanejad: +5.96
Matthews: +2.56
Scheifele: +1.70
Tavares: +1.66
Toews: +1.45
Malkin: -0.75
Stamkos: -1.30


Some observations:
- Draisaitl and McDavid are so far above the others offensively they're in a different class completely. MacKinnon is the only one within the same hemisphere. All 3 guys have among the best positive impact on goal differential in the league (GF% rel), these guys should rank in the top-3 on any reasonable list.
- I thought hard about putting MacKinnon above Draisaitl due to the McDavid effect, but ultimately decided against it for several reasons: he isn't ahead of Draisaitl in any of the metrics listed above, Draisaitl actually scored MORE away from McDavid than with him last year, there are 5 guys on the ice at any time and MacKinnon plays on a much better team leading to better QoT (as seen in the lower IPP number), and the differences in P/GP are not insignificant. Draisaitl had a greater positive impact on his team over the 2-year span, too.
- An argument can be made for Crosby in the top-3, but injuries are stunting his overall production, which slowed year-over-year. Still, best in class GF% rel and 4th best P/GP should have him easily in 4th place.
- Let the Matthews v Eichel controversy continue. They're pretty even offensively but Eichel's much better GF% impact swayed me.
- Malkin came back with a VERY strong campaign in 19-20, proving he absolutely belongs in the top-10 still. His GF% rel numbers look weak, but that was largely due to a poor (by these standards) 2018-19 season. His offense (P/GP, IPP) put him above Matthews for me, but wasn't enough to overcome the lead in GF% rel that Eichel has.
- Zibanejad makes a case for himself. I didn't think he'd be anywhere close to a top-10 spot, but with greater offensive impact than Aho and Barkov and with a competitive overall impact, he belongs. He drives play better than those two also.
- Aho has better numbers than a bunch of these guys, putting him in a bottom-5 spot shouldn't be controversial. Same with Barkov.
- Stamkos plays wing a bunch so I'm not sure he should be considered here. You can see the positive affects of playing a lot of minutes with Point and Kucherov in the first 2 charts above. Weak GF% rel though.
- Speaking of Point, offensively he benefits from playing with Kucherov (his really low IPP in chart #1 speaks to this), but he also adds a lot to the line defensively and he has the 10th most goals of all NHL centers. Just misses the list, I think all ten of these guys would do better in his situation.
- I'm not seeing any justification for having Couterier on this list. He's decent defensively but doesn't provide near enough offense to be in the running IMO.
- O'Reilly is in the same position as Couterier, but his defensive impact is better. I really wanted to include him for his outstanding GF% rel number, but I just couldn't justify putting him ahead of either Barkov or Aho. He needs more offense.
- These numbers don't show Scheifele as deserving of a top-10 spot. He's decent offensively but isn't driving play like most of these guys, and isn't great defensively.
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
13$100,000,000$101,600,500$0$0-$1,600,500
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$5,900,000$5,900,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,460,250$8,460,250
C
UFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$1,875,000$1,875,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,125,000$6,125,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 11, 2020 at 1:23 p.m.
#1
RangerWall92
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 989
This is why no one likes advanced stats
Nov. 11, 2020 at 1:25 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2019
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 686
Horrible list
Nov. 11, 2020 at 1:31 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 865
Quoting: RangerWall92
This is why no one likes advanced stats


Advanced stats are just simple stats stacked up in a way that multiple aspects can be looked at in a single metric. There's nothing to hate about them other than the fact that they may be a little confusing.

On another note I think Bergeron's defensive game is definitely still elite and he should've been considered.
bhavikp27 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 1:31 p.m.
#4
the_trade_boi437
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 377
Likes: 67
you put work into this but the reason Draisaitl is so high is becuase he has mcjesus, he is good ngl but when your playing with mcjeasus your guaranteed a 50 plus point season
RangerWall92 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 1:40 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 1,082
Mackinnon is forsure 2nd
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:03 p.m.
#6
Hockey IQ
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 1,481
Geno for sure stays in the top-10 till he gets too old. Sid is still at #1 for me. he is an elite playmaker and actaually plays defense as opposed to McDavid and Draisaitl. how can they be better than Sid when they literally don't have any interest in playing anything remotely looking like defense.
mhockey91 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:04 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 538
finally Malkin gets credit on one of these lists
Pens3lieve, mhockey91 and CD282 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:04 p.m.
#8
Hockey IQ
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 1,481
Sid
McDavid
MacKinnon

after that a mix of
eichel/malkin/matthews

after that a mix of
zibenejad/barkov/aho/etc....
mhockey91 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:04 p.m.
#9
Lets Go Blues
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,774
Likes: 4,332
Quoting: RangerWall92
This is why no one likes advanced stats


This list is legitimately in opposition to advanced stats - these are raw point totals, pts per game, and 5v5 plus-minus.

An advanced stats list would be based on RAPM (measures the individual performance of a given player in an environment where many factors can impact their raw results), expected goals %, relative-to-teammates, quality of competition, etc.

My opinion is that points matter, stats matter, but if you can support 'why the player is able to perform' with more than 'he was one of the last 3 guys to touch the puck before it went in', you have a better argument. Also, if I were going to use raw points, I'd at least divide per 60 instead of per game. And I'd try to factor in 5v5 vs PP since there seems to be a lot of noise in who/what gets credit for PP production.
bhavikp27 and CD282 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:04 p.m.
#10
Hockey IQ
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 1,481
Quoting: BigOaf69
finally Malkin gets credit on one of these lists


unlike the NHL's gong show top 100 list......
CD282 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:07 p.m.
#11
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
In terms of overall play, IMO:
1-Sid
2-MacK
3-McDavid
4-Matthews
5-Point
mhockey91 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:11 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Sid is still #2, but other than that I like it
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:12 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,578
Likes: 5,454
Quoting: RangerWall92
This is why no one likes advanced stats


There is literally only one advanced stat here. Pts and Pts/GP is a basic stat.
I guess if Matthews was higher than Eichel, you don't comment that.
CD282 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:12 p.m.
#14
Sabres are elite
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,991
Likes: 3,305
Finally some respect for Jack Eichel. The Sabres fan base thanks you. I'll petition around to get you hired by the NHL as a writer
CD282 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:16 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,015
Likes: 7,737
Quoting: RangerWall92
This is why no one likes advanced stats


There's nothing advanced about points, points percentage and points-per-game.
Saskleaf and chungus liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:19 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
Hard to set the bias part of me aside when considering 2&3 but do agree with you on that. The one name I see constantly on these lists that I just can’t get behind is eichel. I can understand and respect why he’s there just wouldn’t be for me.
CD282 liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:20 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,015
Likes: 7,737
Quoting: Club_de_Hockey_le_Canadien
On another note I think Bergeron's defensive game is definitely still elite and he should've been considered.


It is and he was. He just doesn't drive offense enough, he depends on his elite wingers to do that. If you put, say, Aho or Barkov between Marchand and Pastrnak, they would produce better results in basically every facet of the game. IMO. Bergeron is still an elite player, just not top-10.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:22 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,015
Likes: 7,737
Quoting: Avs_fan437
you put work into this but the reason Draisaitl is so high is becuase he has mcjesus, he is good ngl but when your playing with mcjeasus your guaranteed a 50 plus point season


Quoting: Cheddamonkey37
Mackinnon is forsure 2nd


- I thought hard about putting MacKinnon above Draisaitl due to the McDavid effect, but ultimately decided against it for several reasons: he isn't ahead of Draisaitl in any of the metrics listed above, Draisaitl actually scored MORE away from McDavid than with him last year, there are 5 guys on the ice at any time and MacKinnon plays on a much better team leading to better QoT (as seen in the lower IPP number), and the differences in P/GP are not insignificant. Draisaitl had a greater positive impact on his team over the 2-year span, too.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:23 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,015
Likes: 7,737
Quoting: flamesfan
Horrible list


Insightful comment. Username checks out.

Thanks for dropping by.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:26 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,015
Likes: 7,737
Quoting: Pens3lieve
Geno for sure stays in the top-10 till he gets too old. Sid is still at #1 for me. he is an elite playmaker and actaually plays defense as opposed to McDavid and Draisaitl. how can they be better than Sid when they literally don't have any interest in playing anything remotely looking like defense.


You should watch Edmonton sometimes, its really not as bad as you make it out to be. Crosby just isn't quite good enough to crack the top 3. No shame in that, he's 33 years old now. I'm a big fan, but I can't justify him above any of the top-3.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:36 p.m.
#21
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,015
Likes: 7,737
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
In terms of overall play, IMO:
1-Sid
2-MacK
3-McDavid
4-Matthews
5-Point


Point isn't that great when you take Kucherov away from him. Kucherov is driving that line unquestionably. Offensively he's a top-3 player. Boxcars and (P/GP) over the past 2 years:

1. Draisaitl: 93-122-215 (1.41)
2. McDavid: 75-138-213 (1.50)
3. Kucherov: 74-139-213 (1.42); 80.68 IPP
.
.
17. Point: 66-90-156 (1.08) ; 62.15 IPP
.
19. Matthews: 84-69-153 (1.11)

Their underlying metrics make it look like Kucherov is tilting the ice more than Point is too. At 5v5 over the past 2 years:

Together: 54.42 CF%
Kuch alone: 52.16
Point alone: 48.17

Together: 54.36 FF%
Kuch alone: 51.59
Point alone: 47.59

Together: 53.93 SF%
Kuch alone: 50.87
Point alone: 47.43

Together: 55.56 xGF%
Kuch alone: 51.34
Point alone: 50.08

IMO Point isn't a top-15 player in the league without Kucherov. He was front and center in the playoffs this year but still needed Kucherov in order to make a positive impact:

Together: 63.30 CF%
Kuch alone: 62.79
Point alone: 48.51

Together: 62.77 FF%
Kuch alone: 65.54
Point alone: 45.71

Together: 63.13 SF%
Kuch alone: 65.05
Point alone: 41.67

Together: 64.30 xGF%
Kuch alone: 68.55
Point alone: 52.25

In terms of "overall play", Point doesn't even breakeven without Kucherov beside him. He's not a top-5 player in the league or even a top-20 player. Matthews is top-20, but I'm not seeing any evidence that he's top-5 in terms of overall impact.
Saskleaf liked this.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 2:45 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,015
Likes: 7,737
Quoting: Skyraider112
Finally some respect for Jack Eichel. The Sabres fan base thanks you. I'll petition around to get you hired by the NHL as a writer


I'll put him up at 4th if you can negotiate a 25% raise too! Heart Eyes
Nov. 11, 2020 at 3:13 p.m.
#23
Go leafs go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,232
Likes: 9,186
Uh, this list is ok, but overall not very good. Put MacKinnon second at least, if not first, and also there is literally no reason Malkin is better than Matthews at this point (obiously 5 years ago, Malkin would be top 5 at least, but he's declined). Also Matthews>Eichel, Matthews is a top 5 centre.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 3:15 p.m.
#24
Go leafs go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 13,232
Likes: 9,186
Quoting: Pens3lieve
Sid
McDavid
MacKinnon

after that a mix of
eichel/malkin/matthews

after that a mix of
zibenejad/barkov/aho/etc....


Sid first still? Uh no, and I really really like Sid. Sid is probably 3rd. Or are you trying to say those 3 are interchangeable? Also Malkin is in the third tier with Zib, Aho and Barkov.
Nov. 11, 2020 at 3:34 p.m.
#25
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,015
Likes: 7,737
Quoting: Saskleaf
Uh, this list is ok, but overall not very good. Put MacKinnon second at least, if not first, and also there is literally no reason Malkin is better than Matthews at this point (obiously 5 years ago, Malkin would be top 5 at least, but he's declined). Also Matthews>Eichel, Matthews is a top 5 centre.


Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. Your uninformed opinion isn't going to change my informed opinion.

Show your work please.
Saskleaf liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll