SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Strome for DeBrusk who adds

Created by: Cdn_bacon
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 15, 2020
Published: Nov. 15, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,250,000
Trades
CHI
  1. DeBrusk, Jake [RFA Rights]
BOS
  1. Strome, Dylan [RFA Rights]
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$66,048,814$1,090,244$5,050,000$15,451,186

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$562,500$562,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$725,000$725,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 15, 2020 at 1:09 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 77
Likes: 28
bruins say no 100 times
Nov. 15, 2020 at 1:09 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,728
Likes: 1,559
Chicago.
Nov. 15, 2020 at 1:10 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
Hawks add a fair bit
Nov. 15, 2020 at 1:12 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,243
Likes: 19,510
This trade wouldnt happen this year but if Strome bounces back a little its pretty close IMO
yikes liked this.
Nov. 15, 2020 at 1:36 p.m.
#5
In Connor We Trust
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 3,315
Likes: 2,080
Hawks Reject we have to many LW
Mark_Kelley liked this.
Nov. 15, 2020 at 1:56 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,573
Likes: 5,453
Bruins decline. Strome is C, we don't need that.
Nov. 15, 2020 at 1:56 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 1,219
on value alone it's not bad. but I think the Hawks reject.
Nov. 15, 2020 at 9:55 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
The concept is good thought and although my initial thoughts were that it could benefit both mutually regardless of what picks/prospects would need to be included I think Debrusk is another lightweight winger to add to our top 6. I like his game and his grit but I would probably prefer a bigger bodied wing. In closing, if this is what we ended up with I wouldn't be deeply upset.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll