SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

mika

Created by: Cardiak
Team: 2020-21 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 17, 2020
Published: Nov. 17, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
CAR
  1. Zibanejad, Mika
Additional Details:
mika comes extended 7x8
2.
CAR
  1. 2021 4th round pick (TOR)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (TOR)
TOR
  1. McGinn, Brock
Additional Details:
odd man out
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the STL
2022
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
2023
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$78,750,655$1,367,073$3,707,500$2,749,345
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,460,250$8,460,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,150,000$2,150,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,125,000$3,125,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$1,300,000$1,300,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$763,333$763,333 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
C, RW
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 17, 2020 at 2:41 p.m.
#1
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Horrible trade for the canes. Rangers should take this and run.
Nov. 17, 2020 at 2:43 p.m.
#2
Rino91a
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 508
Likes: 123
Rangers would say no due too lack of centers
Josh liked this.
Nov. 17, 2020 at 2:46 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Glep
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 911
Quoting: Jamiepo
Horrible trade for the canes. Rangers should take this and run.


hmm i thought so. hard to tell the value of mika. what would the rangers have to add roughly for it to be fair. krastov? Miller? lundkist? chytil?
Nov. 17, 2020 at 2:49 p.m.
#4
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Hurricanes73
hmm i thought so. hard to tell the value of mika. what would the rangers have to add roughly for it to be fair. krastov? Miller? lundkist? chytil?


I think the canes just need to remove slavin from any trade. He is by far the canes best Dman. In my opinion he is the 2nd best Dman in the league.

Don’t see a trade that works here.
Davioparker liked this.
Nov. 17, 2020 at 2:53 p.m.
#5
Rino91a
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 508
Likes: 123
Quoting: Jamiepo
I think the canes just need to remove slavin from any trade. He is by far the canes best Dman. In my opinion he is the 2nd best Dman in the league.

Don’t see a trade that works here.

Second best dman is a large stretch
JimmyBeee, mokumboi, Mike_Gartner and 2 others liked this.
Nov. 17, 2020 at 2:54 p.m.
#6
Rino91a
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 508
Likes: 123
Quoting: Hurricanes73
hmm i thought so. hard to tell the value of mika. what would the rangers have to add roughly for it to be fair. krastov? Miller? lundkist? chytil?

it would be a B level prospect and a 3rd plus rounder. Rangers wouldn’t do it anyway nor Mika would waive to Carolina so doesn’t work each way
Nov. 17, 2020 at 3:06 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 115
Likes: 26
Quoting: Rino911
Second best dman is a large stretch


L A R G E
Mike_Gartner liked this.
Nov. 17, 2020 at 3:24 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 757
Quoting: Jamiepo
Horrible trade for the canes. Rangers should take this and run.


i can't tell if you are serious or not here...
Nov. 17, 2020 at 3:31 p.m.
#9
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Mike_Gartner
i can't tell if you are serious or not here...


100% serious. Rangers probably don’t run with it due to lack of centre depth. In a vacuum rangers win this trade and it’s not even close.
Nov. 17, 2020 at 3:37 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 757
Quoting: Jamiepo
100% serious. Rangers probably don’t run with it due to lack of centre depth. In a vacuum rangers win this trade and it’s not even close.


give me some justification here.
i fail to see how a LD gets traded straight up for a 1C coming off of a year where he netted 41 in 57 - and the team getting the LD is a clear winner?
Slavin is a real nice player, but come on...

then you get some clueless saying the Rangers need to add one of their top prospects?!
send me some of that stuff you are smoking...
Spanky227 liked this.
Nov. 17, 2020 at 4:35 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 1,559
Value-wise Mika and Slavin have had rougly equal monetary value over the last 3 seasons (Mika = 41.6 mil, Slavin 40.6 mil). That's using Evolving Wild's $/xSPAR figures with their positional adjustment.

That being said, Mika logged 1100 less mins than Slavin over that span, making his /60 value considerably higher. There's not much question that Mika is the more valuable player on the ice when you factor in that with the position.

I don't think the Rangers or the Canes do it. They can't really afford to weaken an already super weak C position and Canes frankly don't need another C.

If Mika's going to be traded it's probably going to be to a 3rd team as part of an Eichel package.
Spanky227 liked this.
Nov. 17, 2020 at 6:31 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 399
The canes are not trading Slavin for just about anyone, he is truly pretty much u touchable
Davioparker and GenXHockey liked this.
Nov. 17, 2020 at 11:45 p.m.
#13
Tspky
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 3,885
Likes: 980
Quoting: Mike_Gartner
give me some justification here.
i fail to see how a LD gets traded straight up for a 1C coming off of a year where he netted 41 in 57 - and the team getting the LD is a clear winner?
Slavin is a real nice player, but come on...

then you get some clueless saying the Rangers need to add one of their top prospects?!
send me some of that stuff you are smoking...


Quoting: Sagecoll
Value-wise Mika and Slavin have had rougly equal monetary value over the last 3 seasons (Mika = 41.6 mil, Slavin 40.6 mil). That's using Evolving Wild's $/xSPAR figures with their positional adjustment.

That being said, Mika logged 1100 less mins than Slavin over that span, making his /60 value considerably higher. There's not much question that Mika is the more valuable player on the ice when you factor in that with the position.

I don't think the Rangers or the Canes do it. They can't really afford to weaken an already super weak C position and Canes frankly don't need another C.

If Mika's going to be traded it's probably going to be to a 3rd team as part of an Eichel package.


Agreed. The only person on the Canes I would give up Mika for (and it would have to be a package to get Mika with him in it) would be Necas.
Nov. 18, 2020 at 9:28 a.m.
#14
Join the Hakanposse
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 44
Likes: 9
Quoting: Rino911
Second best dman is a large stretch


Not as much of a stretch as you think
Davioparker liked this.
Nov. 18, 2020 at 9:37 a.m.
#15
Join the Hakanposse
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 44
Likes: 9
Quoting: Mike_Gartner
give me some justification here.
i fail to see how a LD gets traded straight up for a 1C coming off of a year where he netted 41 in 57 - and the team getting the LD is a clear winner?
Slavin is a real nice player, but come on...

then you get some clueless saying the Rangers need to add one of their top prospects?!
send me some of that stuff you are smoking...


i fail to see how a C gets traded straight up for a 1LD coming off of a year where he had 30 assists in 68 and was a +30 - and the team getting the 1LD isn't a clear winner?
Mika is a real nice player, but come on...
GenXHockey liked this.
Nov. 18, 2020 at 10:26 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 757
Quoting: oliwer_smashki
i fail to see how a C gets traded straight up for a 1LD coming off of a year where he had 30 assists in 68 and was a +30 - and the team getting the 1LD isn't a clear winner?
Mika is a real nice player, but come on...


in general left shot defensemen are much easier to come by and replace over 1st line centers - if he was right shot and/or played the right side this would be a bit more believable.
i'm not saying the basis of the trade is off, all i am saying is that there are no clear winners/losers in this trade.
it is just my opinion that if a team is trading a left shot dman for a number 1 center - more needs to be added, unless your last name is Hedman.
Nov. 19, 2020 at 11:30 a.m.
#17
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Rino911
Second best dman is a large stretch


Hedman is better, I can think of no one else who is outright better. Probably 5 or 6 guys that are debatable.
Nov. 19, 2020 at 12:00 p.m.
#18
Join the Hakanposse
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 44
Likes: 9
Quoting: Mike_Gartner
in general left shot defensemen are much easier to come by and replace over 1st line centers - if he was right shot and/or played the right side this would be a bit more believable.
i'm not saying the basis of the trade is off, all i am saying is that there are no clear winners/losers in this trade.
it is just my opinion that if a team is trading a left shot dman for a number 1 center - more needs to be added, unless your last name is Hedman.


Ahhhh... I see. When Dougie is hurt Slavin slides over onto the right side. It is his off side, but he plays it often. That's part of why he is so good, because he can play both sides and is elite at both.
Nov. 19, 2020 at 2:01 p.m.
#19
Rino91a
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 508
Likes: 123
Quoting: Jamiepo
Hedman is better, I can think of no one else who is outright better. Probably 5 or 6 guys that are debatable.


Josi, Carlson are just two that are far better
Nov. 19, 2020 at 2:08 p.m.
#20
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Rino911
Josi, Carlson are just two that are far better


Lol, Josi is one of the debatable ones, Carlson isn’t close. Slavin’s defensive game is highly underrated. The fact that he plays well in all three zones is what makes him so good.
Nov. 19, 2020 at 2:13 p.m.
#21
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,157
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Sagecoll
Value-wise Mika and Slavin have had rougly equal monetary value over the last 3 seasons (Mika = 41.6 mil, Slavin 40.6 mil). That's using Evolving Wild's $/xSPAR figures with their positional adjustment.

That being said, Mika logged 1100 less mins than Slavin over that span, making his /60 value considerably higher. There's not much question that Mika is the more valuable player on the ice when you factor in that with the position.

I don't think the Rangers or the Canes do it. They can't really afford to weaken an already super weak C position and Canes frankly don't need another C.

If Mika's going to be traded it's probably going to be to a 3rd team as part of an Eichel package.


Dmen make less than forwards. Centre is for sure a more valuable position but slavin is in a different echelon.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll