SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

3 Way Deal with Calgary and Nashville

Created by: SmugTkachuk
Team: 2020-21 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 1, 2020
Published: Dec. 1, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Some cap would still need to be touched up for Calgary and Nashville

To Nashville:
Stamkos
Pelleltier
Ryan

To Tampa:
1st (Cgy)
2nd (Nsh)
2nd (Cgy
Bennett

To Calgary:
Forsberg


Why this is good for Nashville: Top end center that can elevate that team without giving up a 1st.

Why this is good for Calgary: Right shot winger that absolutely fits what the Flames are looking for in their top 6

Why this is good for Tampa: It's not, but they need to get under that cap badly and this is the only guy they can move that will allow them to fit both RFA contracts without moving another major piece
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
1$2,500,000
Trades
1.
TBL
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (NSH)
2.
TBL
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. 2021 1st round pick (CGY)
CGY
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the NJD
2022
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
2023
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the TBL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$81,216,666$0$0$283,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,450,000$4,450,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,800,000$1,800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$5,166,666$5,166,666
C, LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,650,000$1,650,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$4,800,000$4,800,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
G
UFA - 8
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,300,000$1,300,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 1, 2020 at 3:59 p.m.
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 18,211
Likes: 10,557
What do Flames get?
Just saw the description
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:00 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 733
Quoting: Gmonwy
What do Flames get?


Forsberg from Nashville. They put up the first for Nashville and send a good prospect to Nashville.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:10 p.m.
#3
I want Gourde back
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 2,350
Stamkos ain't waiving his NMC
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:14 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 733
Quoting: imawesome
Stamkos ain't waiving his NMC


Agreed. I think if he were to waive Nashville would be one of the few attractive places that could fit him.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:21 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: imawesome
Stamkos ain't waiving his NMC


are you kidding me. Stamkos is a 40 goal scorer. They aren't trading him for this.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:30 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 733
Quoting: pharrow
are you kidding me. Stamkos is a 40 goal scorer. They aren't trading him for this.


Okay then they lose Ciarelli and Cernak for less. Guys aren't waiving their NMC's down there and Killorn is the only big piece with full protection. A Killorn move would open up room for one of Cernak or Ciarelli and you just zapped their value again because the Lightning would get more desperate. No one is taking TJ for free, Gourde's contract is nearly as bad as Johnson's and no one else is worth moving. They just went through an entire playoff without Stamkos and faired okay, he's the most sensical piece to move and with full protection his value is not where it should be.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:32 p.m.
#7
I want Gourde back
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 2,350
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Okay then they lose Ciarelli and Cernak for less. Guys aren't waiving their NMC's down there and Killorn is the only big piece with full protection. A Killorn move would open up room for one of Cernak or Ciarelli and you just zapped their value again because the Lightning would get more desperate. No one is taking TJ for free, Gourde's contract is nearly as bad as Johnson's and no one else is worth moving. They just went through an entire playoff without Stamkos and faired okay, he's the most sensical piece to move and with full protection his value is not where it should be.


They trade Killorn, sign Cernak and then trade either McDonagh/Johnson/Cirelli/Palat.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:34 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Okay then they lose Ciarelli and Cernak for less. Guys aren't waiving their NMC's down there and Killorn is the only big piece with full protection. A Killorn move would open up room for one of Cernak or Ciarelli and you just zapped their value again because the Lightning would get more desperate. No one is taking TJ for free, Gourde's contract is nearly as bad as Johnson's and no one else is worth moving. They just went through an entire playoff without Stamkos and faired okay, he's the most sensical piece to move and with full protection his value is not where it should be.


dude this childish attitude.
They will deal with Cirelli and Cernak. It doesn't cost them Stamkos.
Your bitterness is unreal.
And believe me if their choice is between a 40 goal center and Cernak.....they are gonna keep the 40 goal center and so would every other damn team in the whole NHL.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:37 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 733
Quoting: pharrow
dude this childish attitude.
They will deal with Cirelli and Cernak. It doesn't cost them Stamkos.
Your bitterness is unreal.
And believe me if their choice is between a 40 goal center and Cernak.....they are gonna keep the 40 goal center and so would every other damn team in the whole NHL.


Who hurt your feelings? What attitude are you reading?! Haha yikes, I didn't know this site got so delicate!
I'm going to continue to have a conversation elsewhere instead of moving along with your goofy reply okay?
Abroot liked this.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:38 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 733
Quoting: imawesome
They trade Killorn, sign Cernak and then trade either McDonagh/Johnson/Cirelli/Palat.


Ideally for sure but you look at who can fit those contracts that would be an attractive place for those guys to waive to.. It's a very tough find.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:42 p.m.
#11
I want Gourde back
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 2,350
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Ideally for sure but you look at who can fit those contracts that would be an attractive place for those guys to waive to.. It's a very tough find.


I was thinking Nashville and Columbus maybe. They are smaller markets though so they might not be able to afford it.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:45 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 733
Quoting: imawesome
I was thinking Nashville and Columbus maybe. They are smaller markets though so they might not be able to afford it.


Out of those two Nashville is obviously a great option and a place guys would want to go, of the guys we have listed above I think that Cirelli and Palat are the only two they would look at. Definitely an interesting situation to watch.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:49 p.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Who hurt your feelings? What attitude are you reading?! Haha yikes, I didn't know this site got so delicate!
I'm going to continue to have a conversation elsewhere instead of moving along with your goofy reply okay?


dude, if you can't realize what's wrong with this.

"Okay then they lose Ciarelli and Cernak for less. "

then you should really self evaluate.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:50 p.m.
#14
I want Gourde back
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 2,350
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Out of those two Nashville is obviously a great option and a place guys would want to go, of the guys we have listed above I think that Cirelli and Palat are the only two they would look at. Definitely an interesting situation to watch.


I think they'd look at Killorn
SmugTkachuk liked this.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 4:57 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 733
Quoting: pharrow
dude, if you can't realize what's wrong with this.

"Okay then they lose Ciarelli and Cernak for less. "

then you should really self evaluate.


If your feelings are so hurt by that and you can't read that without flying off the handle then you severely need to get a hold of whatever you're dealing with.
Take a look at how the other guy dealt with it, like a grown up.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 5:00 p.m.
#16
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
If your feelings are so hurt by that and you can't read that without flying off the handle then you severely need to get a hold of whatever you're dealing with.
Take a look at how the other guy dealt with it, like a grown up.


dude no one's feelings are hurt here. You seem to think it's no me, for calling you out on it. It's not.
It just makes what you wrote look like pure nonsense.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 5:04 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 733
Quoting: pharrow
dude no one's feelings are hurt here. You seem to think it's no me, for calling you out on it. It's not.
It just makes what you wrote look like pure nonsense.


If I said things like this would you still think I need to check my attitude at the door or would it make what I said nonsense?
"2025 eyeroll, LOL my god listen to yourself."

"congrats, you just made the penguins worse."

"like obviously"

Or do they just make me look like an enraged little kid?
Dec. 1, 2020 at 5:21 p.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
If I said things like this would you still think I need to check my attitude at the door or would it make what I said nonsense?
"2025 eyeroll, LOL my god listen to yourself."

"congrats, you just made the penguins worse."

"like obviously"

Or do they just make me look like an enraged little kid?


you realize the "like obviously" was a totally sarcastic reply right?
and no none of those replies have your tone. At all.
"Fine...then you lose both then....because i'm bitter...."
really, it's a horrible tone. Figure it out.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 5:28 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 733
Quoting: pharrow
you realize the "like obviously" was a totally sarcastic reply right?
and no none of those replies have your tone. At all.
"Fine...then you lose both then....because i'm bitter...."
really, it's a horrible tone. Figure it out.


Hahaha so you can defend one of your own comments and just ignore the other ones because you look like a child in those ones. You physically typed out "eyeroll" and then want to be talked to like an adult on here. I have zero bitterness whatsoever, as proven by the other conversation that stemmed from that comment, you've come in here with your crocodile tears and a full diaper upset that someone thinks what you said was stupid. Does my tone reflect hysterics now? Is that what you're getting from this? Because this could be one of the funniest conversations I have had on this website.
Dec. 1, 2020 at 6:55 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 322
Likes: 76
This is not right, right? Do we get Forsberg for just a 1st a 2nd and Bennett? OMG YES
Dec. 1, 2020 at 7:16 p.m.
#21
SEA GM v5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 878
Quoting: az27042007
This is not right, right? Do we get Forsberg for just a 1st a 2nd and Bennett? OMG YES


Don't forget Pelletier and Ryan
Dec. 1, 2020 at 7:28 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 322
Likes: 76
Quoting: ItzMeTaboo
Don't forget Pelletier and Ryan


oh, right I didn't realize.
Dec. 2, 2020 at 9:17 a.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 733
Quoting: az27042007
This is not right, right? Do we get Forsberg for just a 1st a 2nd and Bennett? OMG YES


Yes as someone mentioned, Calgary would be giving up 1st, Pelletier, Bennett, Ryan for Forsberg. In a vacuum Nashville doesn't do that, but when Nashville is getting Stamkos without giving up a first or their high end prospects you would have to think it is a little more attractive to them.
Dec. 2, 2020 at 9:19 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 322
Likes: 76
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Yes as someone mentioned, Calgary would be giving up 1st, Pelletier, Bennett, Ryan for Forsberg. In a vacuum Nashville doesn't do that, but when Nashville is getting Stamkos without giving up a first or their high end prospects you would have to think it is a little more attractive to them.


Yes it is but it wont happen since Stamkos NMC
Dec. 2, 2020 at 10:25 a.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 1,760
Quoting: pharrow
are you kidding me. Stamkos is a 40 goal scorer. They aren't trading him for this.


I completely agree. You dont trade this guy for this package or at all really, he's legit awesome.
TB is in a tough spot (their fault), but dealing their captain doesn't make sense IMO
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll