Tyler Bertuzzi is putting up more points on the worst team in the NHL, Then Kerfoot has putting up on 2 very stacked teams in Colorado and Toronto. I'll take Bertuzzi over Kerfoot any day of the year. Bertuzzi early 2nd round pick Kerfoot 5th round pick no comparison.
Tyler Bertuzzi as put up like 5 more points in his best season versus Kerfoot's best season. If Kerfoot is a 3rd liner, so is Bertuzzi, which was the point. SO, if you can get 2 first liners for the price of one like you stated then wow, what a deal for the wings.
Tyler Bertuzzi as put up like 5 more points in his best season versus Kerfoot's best season. If Kerfoot is a 3rd liner, so is Bertuzzi, which was the point. SO, if you can get 2 first liners for the price of one like you stated then wow, what a deal for the wings.
Bertuzzi isn't a 3rd liner. He plays with Larkin and Mantha on the top line.
Tyler Bertuzzi as put up like 5 more points in his best season versus Kerfoot's best season. If Kerfoot is a 3rd liner, so is Bertuzzi, which was the point. SO, if you can get 2 first liners for the price of one like you stated then wow, what a deal for the wings.
Bertuzzi is easily a Top 6 LW just coming into his prime, He'll easily be a 50-60 point winger plus he bangs on the board unlike Kerfoot he goes into the dirty area's like i stated i'll take bertuzzi over Kerfoot any day of the year.
You've obviously never seen Bertuzzi play. But keep digging that hole. It's entertaining. 👍 PRO tip: sometimes it's easier to just take the L.
you've obviously never seen Kerfoot play, but keep choosing to not even try and get the point I was making.
Gonna say it nice and simple though just to make sure.
1-the poster stated that Kerfoot was a 3rd liner
2-Kerfoot and Bertuzzi are similarly capable players
3-if Kerfoot is a 3rd liner by the posters definition, then so is Bertuzzi
4-these are HIS definitions of ability, not mine.
wow, and he can barely outscore Kerfoot, who is apparently a 3rd liner. I wonder what that means.
Dude Kerfoot is easily a 3rd liner in Detroit, So why even argue the fact. Maybe on real stacked teams Bertuzzi is a 3rd liner but not in Detroit. And Kerfoot has played with very good players just like Bertuzzi let's leave it at that.
you've obviously never seen Kerfoot play, but keep choosing to not even try and get the point I was making.
Gonna say it nice and simple though just to make sure.
1-the poster stated that Kerfoot was a 3rd liner
2-Kerfoot and Bertuzzi are similarly capable players
3-if Kerfoot is a 3rd liner by the posters definition, then so is Bertuzzi
4-these are HIS definitions of ability, not mine.
Oh I've seen Kerfoot play. He sucks. That's why Leaf fans have been pawning him off In every Leafs CF ACGM roster. But keep digging guy. You're the Man! 👍
Bertuzzi is easily a Top 6 LW just coming into his prime, He'll easily be a 50-60 point winger plus he bangs on the board unlike Kerfoot he goes into the dirty area's like i stated i'll take bertuzzi over Kerfoot any day of the year.
why is this so hard for y'all, i literally never said that Bertuzzi wasnt a top 6 winger, i pointed out that he and Kerfoot are similar in abilities and that if one was a 3rd line winger than by your own definition the other was too! You are the one who called Bertuzzi a 3rd liner, not me.
Oh and you seriously have no idea about how Kerfoot plays at all.
Oh I've seen Kerfoot play. He sucks. That's why Leaf fans have been pawning him off In every Leafs CF ACGM roster. But keep digging guy. You're the Man! 👍
nope, you've never seen him play, and it's very clear, you have zero hockey knowledge yadda yadda yadda.
why is this so hard for y'all, i literally never said that Bertuzzi wasnt a top 6 winger, i pointed out that he and Kerfoot are similar in abilities and that if one was a 3rd line winger than by your own definition the other was too! You are the one who called Bertuzzi a 3rd liner, not me.
Oh and you seriously have no idea about how Kerfoot plays at all.
Why are you still digging? There's no comparison between Kerfoot and Bertuzzi. None.
my dude, you're getting mad online because your own fan called Bertuzzi a 3rd liner and are getting your underwear bunched up because i pointed it out. You should try watching the games.
why is this so hard for y'all, i literally never said that Bertuzzi wasnt a top 6 winger, i pointed out that he and Kerfoot are similar in abilities and that if one was a 3rd line winger than by your own definition the other was too! You are the one who called Bertuzzi a 3rd liner, not me.
Oh and you seriously have no idea about how Kerfoot plays at all.
Got news for value wise Kerfoot isn't worth more then a 3rd round pick, Bertuzzi would easily get 2 2nd round picks like Athanasiou. That's just plain fact.
Got news for value wise Kerfoot isn't worth more then a 3rd round pick, Bertuzzi would easily get 2 2nd round picks like Athanasiou. That's just plain fact.
got news for you, Bertuzzi isnt worth more than a 3rd round pick. Bertuzzi would easily get 2 2nd round picks like Roman Polak. See, i can make up stuff and pretend it's fact too.
It's not my fault you're a Sensitive Sally with insecurity issues. Way too thin skinned. Drink a latte. Ignore list you go. I can't stand Sensitive Sally's. There's no ways you've ever played competitive sports.
I want you to understand just how hilarious this is. I compared Bertuzzi to Kerfoot then you busted in here throwing insults and getting mad, and then at the slightest pushback all you can do is huff and puff and throw around misogynistic crap like this claiming it is actually me who is sensitive about the topic.
I know you're trying to get out in front of this and make yourself look all manly, but this is some highschool tactics and it's frankly embarrassing.
He's not gonna put up a ton of points but he's very valuable to a very young and skilled team like the rangers that don't have a lot of physicality
he's an ok offensive 4th liner who isnt good defensively and he's massively over rated because he hits sometimes. The rangers may like him, but he doesnt have near the trade value that Rangers fans think he does.
Tyler Bertuzzi is putting up more points on the worst team in the NHL, Then Kerfoot has putting up on 2 very stacked teams in Colorado and Toronto. I'll take Bertuzzi over Kerfoot any day of the year. Bertuzzi late 2nd round pick Kerfoot 5th round pick no comparison.
Being on a weaker team actually helps Bertuzzi
Bertuzzi 48 points in 1371min 2.1 p/60
Kerfoot 28 points in 960min 1.75 p/60
So .26 p/60 is what seperate them. While kerfoot plays a good defensive game and can play centre.
Still not enough to even consider moving Bertuzzi but too many people underestimate kerfoot as a player.
he's an ok offensive 4th liner who isnt good defensively and he's massively over rated because he hits sometimes. The rangers may like him, but he doesnt have near the trade value that Rangers fans think he does.
I'm not saying he's a great player or even one with a ton of value, he is not on the rangers for his offensive or defensive play, the reason rangers fans value him so high is because removing him leaves a big hole in the lineup, it makes the rangers much easier to roll over. Lemieux is 31st in hits in the league, like you said not great but the next rangers forward is 91st, Kreider, so he doesn't get the trade value that some rangers fans give him because of his play but because of the role he fills on the team