SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bold prediction

Created by: jchafe77
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 12, 2020
Published: Dec. 12, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
This will probably NEVER happen, but IMO the leafs are still not tough enough. This is my take on adding grit.

Why I traded Nylander - It pains me to do this but Nylander's contract is not only great for the leafs, but easier to move. I choose Chicago bc A) he is reunited with his brother (Alex) and I believe in sibling chemistry, though it sometimes may never work. B) It gives Chicago some extra fire power up front with Kane and Toews (and yes I do recognize that theyre becoming old farts real soon, but they got a lot of game left in them).
I chose to have Keith come back in the deal as he's soon to retire and TOR has better odds to get further in the playoffs than CHI (hopefully past the 1st round lol), but I added simply for veteran presence and playoff experience (3 cups in 6 seasons with the hawks which blows my mind) and he would be great to mentor to Sandin and others in company.
I also selected Ian Mitchell (a very good top prospect from what I've heard) and Evan Barratt (another prospect) bc Keith alone would just have the Hawks fleecing TOR completely. CHI also gets Dermotts rights to fill the void of their top prospect being let go in this trade.

If your wanting to say something negative, just remember that like me, your sitting behind a computer screen and not a General Manager's desk. But that's like talking to a wall eh?

The only concern I have for this trade is the draft picks because idk if Chicago would be willing to move a 2022 1st and 2023 2nd.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,400,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$7,500,000
5$3,500,000
4$3,250,000
3$1,500,000
2$950,000
5$5,500,000
2$1,075,000
1$750,000
2$850,000
2$1,000,500
2$1,250,000
3$2,800,000
Trades
1.
TOR
    Seattle Kraken - NHL Expansion Draft
    2.
    TOR
    1. Barratt, Evan
    2. Keith, Duncan ($2,769,231 retained)
    3. Mitchell, Ian
    4. 2022 1st round pick (CHI)
    5. 2023 2nd round pick (CHI)
    CHI
    1. Dermott, Travis [RFA Rights]
    2. Nylander, William
    3. 2022 3rd round pick (TOR)
    4. 2023 3rd round pick (TOR)
    3.
    TOR
    1. 2022 3rd round pick (PHI)
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2022
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the PHI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2023
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    21$81,500,000$80,022,148$212,500$0$1,477,852

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,640,250$11,640,250
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $10,903,000$10,903,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $796,667$796,667
    LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,250,000$3,250,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 4
    $2,800,000$2,800,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $850,000$850,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    $750,000$750,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $950,000$950,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $750,000$750,000
    RW
    RFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $7,500,000$7,500,000
    LD
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    G
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,075,000$1,075,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,000,500$1,000,500
    LD
    UFA
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $2,769,231$2,769,231
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,400,000$1,400,000
    LD
    UFA - 2

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 8:27 a.m.
    #1
    sbinalla
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2020
    Posts: 1,150
    Likes: 357
    toronto declines chicago trade
    SadSensFan14 liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 8:44 a.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 19,579
    Likes: 7,353
    Probably the worst Nylander trade in a while. He doesnt get moved for a well past prime defender
    SadSensFan14 liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 9:09 a.m.
    #3
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 559
    Likes: 123
    Quoting: JaredOfLondon
    Probably the worst Nylander trade in a while. He doesnt get moved for a well past prime defender


    You do realize that Chicago's #1 and #5 prospects are also apart of his deal.. right? Not to mention some high potential high draft picks? But, I suppose you'd want me to put Kane here instead so you wont get upset that were losing something.
    ChiHawk liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 9:18 a.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 550
    Likes: 395
    I’d pass as Chicago. Nylander is a great player, I just don’t think he’s going to fit the cap structure moving forward. The Hawks are already going to have 3 high priced forwards of the future in Dach, Debrincat, and Strome. Toews and Kane are going to be around for a while still and they’re going to need paid too. I just don’t think the Hawks can manage to fit Nylander and all those guys under the cap, especially if they retain on Keith. Mitchell is already being counted on to be a big part of the D moving forward, which is where the real issues with this team lie. I get the need for a 1st in the deal, but I think at this point that’s more than likely a top 10 pick.

    Not awful value-wise, but I just don’t see a fit for the Hawks.
    ChiHawk and chungus liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 9:31 a.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 559
    Likes: 123
    Quoting: thesaadfather
    I’d pass as Chicago. Nylander is a great player, I just don’t think he’s going to fit the cap structure moving forward. The Hawks are already going to have 3 high priced forwards of the future in Dach, Debrincat, and Strome. Toews and Kane are going to be around for a while still and they’re going to need paid too. I just don’t think the Hawks can manage to fit Nylander and all those guys under the cap, especially if they retain on Keith. Mitchell is already being counted on to be a big part of the D moving forward, which is where the real issues with this team lie. I get the need for a 1st in the deal, but I think at this point that’s more than likely a top 10 pick.

    Not awful value-wise, but I just don’t see a fit for the Hawks.


    You got an excellent point here
    ChiHawk liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 10:13 a.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2017
    Posts: 18,990
    Likes: 9,300
    Quoting: jchafe77
    You do realize that Chicago's #1 and #5 prospects are also apart of his deal.. right? Not to mention some high potential high draft picks? But, I suppose you'd want me to put Kane here instead so you wont get upset that were losing something.


    Quoting: maplelaughs2297
    toronto declines chicago trade


    Quoting: JaredOfLondon
    Probably the worst Nylander trade in a while. He doesnt get moved for a well past prime defender


    Quoting: thesaadfather
    I’d pass as Chicago. Nylander is a great player, I just don’t think he’s going to fit the cap structure moving forward. The Hawks are already going to have 3 high priced forwards of the future in Dach, Debrincat, and Strome. Toews and Kane are going to be around for a while still and they’re going to need paid too. I just don’t think the Hawks can manage to fit Nylander and all those guys under the cap, especially if they retain on Keith. Mitchell is already being counted on to be a big part of the D moving forward, which is where the real issues with this team lie. I get the need for a 1st in the deal, but I think at this point that’s more than likely a top 10 pick.

    Not awful value-wise, but I just don’t see a fit for the Hawks.


    Yeah, if I'm Chicago I'm not doing that trade. Mitchell will is a top 10 defensive prospect in the NHL and Barratt is a solid 3rd line center prospect plus eating half of Keith's cap hit for a guy who's still a very good 2nd liner and giving up a 1st and 2nd for a team rebuilding is to much for Nylander. Chicago has to pass on this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 10:37 a.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 559
    Likes: 123
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    Yeah, if I'm Chicago I'm not doing that trade. Mitchell will is a top 10 defensive prospect in the NHL and Barratt is a solid 3rd line center prospect plus eating half of Keith's cap hit for a guy who's still a very good 2nd liner and giving up a 1st and 2nd for a team rebuilding is to much for Nylander. Chicago has to pass on this.


    Oh absolutely and its most likely why this will never happen. I just seen it as a veteran add for the leaf's (bc im a fan of TOR) so that the players can get a better understanding of what it takes to get into the playoffs and go far, like Keith did. I still feel the leafs core needs some teaching from the vets, bc i still feel they dont know what it takes to win in the playoffs
    ChiHawk liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 10:49 a.m.
    #8
    MisstheWhalers
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2019
    Posts: 23,627
    Likes: 12,353
    That's a pretty bad trade for Chicago and no way should they be retaining on Keith.

    I know how good Nylander is but this is really slanted in Toronto's favor, Mitchell is gonna be a damn good player!
    SadSensFan14 and Beetlejuice liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 10:52 a.m.
    #9
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2015
    Posts: 59,429
    Likes: 22,637
    Grit, such an overused and meaningless word. Signing and trading for players who are well past their prime...just awful for the Leafs.
    chungus and SadSensFan14 liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 11:14 a.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 9,148
    Likes: 2,223
    Edited Dec. 12, 2020 at 11:25 a.m.
    Quoting: thesaadfather
    I’d pass as Chicago. Nylander is a great player, I just don’t think he’s going to fit the cap structure moving forward. The Hawks are already going to have 3 high priced forwards of the future in Dach, Debrincat, and Strome. Toews and Kane are going to be around for a while still and they’re going to need paid too. I just don’t think the Hawks can manage to fit Nylander and all those guys under the cap, especially if they retain on Keith. Mitchell is already being counted on to be a big part of the D moving forward, which is where the real issues with this team lie. I get the need for a 1st in the deal, but I think at this point that’s more than likely a top 10 pick.

    Not awful value-wise, but I just don’t see a fit for the Hawks.


    If Kane and Toews decide to stay a Hawk for life, their next contract will look like Thornton's or Chara's past their prime team friendly contracts. $5 million down to $2 million.
    SadSensFan14 liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 11:22 a.m.
    #11
    MOVE THE COYOTES
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 4,440
    Likes: 1,549
    Quoting: JaredOfLondon
    Probably the worst Nylander trade in a while. He doesnt get moved for a well past prime defender


    Quoting: maplelaughs2297
    toronto declines chicago trade

    Ya I know it’s terrible!
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 11:22 a.m.
    #12
    MOVE THE COYOTES
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 4,440
    Likes: 1,549
    Quoting: MisstheWhalers
    That's a pretty bad trade for Chicago and no way should they be retaining on Keith.

    I know how good Nylander is but this is really slanted in Toronto's favor, Mitchell is gonna be a damn good player!

    You kidding?
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 11:23 a.m.
    #13
    MOVE THE COYOTES
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 4,440
    Likes: 1,549
    Quoting: jchafe77
    You do realize that Chicago's #1 and #5 prospects are also apart of his deal.. right? Not to mention some high potential high draft picks? But, I suppose you'd want me to put Kane here instead so you wont get upset that were losing something.

    They’re not thaaaaaaaat good.Not compared to Nylander.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 11:27 a.m.
    #14
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 9,148
    Likes: 2,223
    Quoting: Brad21
    They’re not thaaaaaaaat good.Not compared to Nylander.


    Love to see Nylander play beside his younger bro instead of a Kadri or Matthews or J.T.

    I'm sure he'll score 30+ goals and 70 points.

    *sarcasm alert*
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 11:38 a.m.
    #15
    MOVE THE COYOTES
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 4,440
    Likes: 1,549
    Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
    Love to see Nylander play beside his younger bro instead of a Kadri or Matthews or J.T.

    I'm sure he'll score 30+ goals and 70 points.

    *sarcasm alert*

    K I guess you have a point there.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 11:53 a.m.
    #16
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 559
    Likes: 123
    Quoting: Brad21
    Ya I know it’s terrible!


    Come talk to me after that trade on Matthews for half of the bruins roster BS you put up earlier this week goes through..
    SadSensFan14 liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 11:54 a.m.
    #17
    MisstheWhalers
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2019
    Posts: 23,627
    Likes: 12,353
    Quoting: Brad21
    You kidding?


    No, why would I?

    Sorry I didn't realize this thread was for the 22-23 season.. Lol.. but still this is way too much for Nylander, tossing in Dermott and a couple meh picks doesn't even it out imo.

    A 1st, 2nd, their best prospect in Mitchell, another decent one in Barratt and Keith is just way too much, I do take back my statement about the retention on Keith, it'd be fine in this scenario.
    Beetlejuice and Earth liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 11:57 a.m.
    #18
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 559
    Likes: 123
    Quoting: MisstheWhalers
    No, why would I?

    Sorry I didn't realize this thread was for the 22-23 season.. Lol.. but still this is way too much for Nylander, tossing in Dermott and a couple meh picks doesn't even it out imo.

    A 1st, 2nd, their best prospect in Mitchell, another decent one in Barratt and Keith is just way too much, I do take back my statement about the retention on Keith, it'd be fine in this scenario.


    This is a fair statement man and no worries its all good. Lets say it does happen (hypothetically), who would you put in for the trade? As i said before, its purpose was to add some veteran presence and also some mentorship for the younger players
    MisstheWhalers liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 12:03 p.m.
    #19
    MisstheWhalers
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2019
    Posts: 23,627
    Likes: 12,353
    Quoting: jchafe77
    This is a fair statement man and no worries its all good. Lets say it does happen (hypothetically), who would you put in for the trade? As i said before, its purpose was to add some veteran presence and also some mentorship for the younger players


    By 22-23 if Keith is still serviceable and the Leafs need some help on D you keep Nylander and send a 2nd at most to Chicago for Keith.
    Earth liked this.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 12:17 p.m.
    #20
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 559
    Likes: 123
    Quoting: MisstheWhalers
    By 22-23 if Keith is still serviceable and the Leafs need some help on D you keep Nylander and send a 2nd at most to Chicago for Keith.


    Really? Man id figure there be more to go along with keith where hes getting old. But thats a fair statement my dude.
    Dec. 12, 2020 at 5:23 p.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2018
    Posts: 830
    Likes: 716
    As a hawks fan, if we put together that package and only got Nylander in return I would be livid. Not trying to knock Nylander but I don’t think he’d come close to bringing in that return, as these assets stand now. If Mitchell pans out the way he is projected, Toronto might have their new top RD for the next 10 years. (Might be top guy, not guarantee, his potential is very high). That 1st rounder is likely a lottery pick. A rebuilding team trading away their first rounder is a move no NHL should ever make. Every asset going to Toronto has great value. Adding Dermott and the 3rds feel like throw in pieces. So as things stand now, that’s an easy no for me. I have no problem saying that is way too much for Nylander. He is not that special to warrant that return.

    However, this trade is for 2022. These assets value will change by then. Could this trade make sense in 2022? Yeah it could. Could it be a bad trade for Toronto or a bad trade for Chicago? Yeah it could. But evaluating everybody where they stand now, I’d have to say no as a hawks fan.
    jchafe77 liked this.
    Dec. 13, 2020 at 12:23 p.m.
    #22
    MOVE THE COYOTES
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 4,440
    Likes: 1,549
    Quoting: MisstheWhalers
    No, why would I?

    Sorry I didn't realize this thread was for the 22-23 season.. Lol.. but still this is way too much for Nylander, tossing in Dermott and a couple meh picks doesn't even it out imo.

    A 1st, 2nd, their best prospect in Mitchell, another decent one in Barratt and Keith is just way too much, I do take back my statement about the retention on Keith, it'd be fine in this scenario.

    Not really.
    Dec. 13, 2020 at 12:24 p.m.
    #23
    MOVE THE COYOTES
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 4,440
    Likes: 1,549
    Quoting: jchafe77
    Come talk to me after that trade on Matthews for half of the bruins roster BS you put up earlier this week goes through..


    K I guess that wasn’t very good of a trade.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll