Thread Starter
Joined: Dec. 2020
Posts: 110
Likes: 42
You're all very right with respect to the assumptions. Too many opportunities for management to try and speed up the rebuild (which is what they ultimately did with Tavares), but I guess what I was trying to visualize was a situation where they stayed the course, and lost for a couple more seasons. Maybe they do resign JVR and Gardiner but to short term contracts more in line with the plan to compete in 2020 and beyond. Definitely overlooked the Muzzin trade though, he'd likely not be here (but then again neither would his money). As for the RFAs I do think they would have been closer to my assumed deals than the actual ones. Matthews commanded the most and deserved it, but without JT, 10.5 would have him comfortably the highest paid player on the team. Nylander definitely got more than his comparables, that's not even a question. Marner likely has somewhere between 70-80 pts in his contract year without JT and his contract would adjust accordingly. As for the Kadri situation, I believe it's more accurate to say we traded him because we felt we'd get more value from the trade than we would having him play 14min/game @ 3C, which is probably still correct in hindsight.