SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pens prospect pyramid hint its awful

Created by: mhockey91
Team: 2020-21 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 17, 2020
Published: Dec. 17, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
LW: elite guys (hint we have none)
C: projects as top 6 / Top 4 guys
RW: projects as middle 6 / bottom pairing guys

LHD: maybe could be something decent
RHD: probably not NHL
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
3$900,000
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
2023
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$81,500,000$24,013,750$0$2,052,500$57,486,250
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$894,167$894,167
C, LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$795,000$795,000
RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$853,333$853,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RD
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$806,250$806,250 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$725,000$725,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$809,167$809,167 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$809,167$809,167 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$733,333$733,333
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$775,833$775,833 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
RFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$788,333$788,333 (Performance Bonus$42,500$42K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$809,167$809,167 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
C
RFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
RD
RFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,150,000$1,150,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$9,500,000$9,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,940,000$2,940,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$750,000$750,000
RW, C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,200,000$3,200,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,200,000$1,200,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$3,500,000$3,500,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,025,175$4,025,175
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 17, 2020 at 5:07 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2019
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 1,636
That's the cost of being the best team of the salary cap era.
mhockey91, exo2769, penslover8771 and 1 other person liked this.
Dec. 17, 2020 at 5:12 p.m.
#2
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
really undervaluing Maniscalco and OConnor.
OConnor has torn it up everywhere he has gone.
And Maniscalco put up almost a point per game as a defenseman in the NCAA. That's a hard task for even a forward to do because of the competition level. For a defenseman that's really good.
Hell Makar who is a looking like a great defenseman only put up 1.2 roughly. So to say a guy who basically put up .9 ppg at the NCAA level is a "might turn into something" is a bit absurd.
He has the size and tools to be a solid 2RD at the NHL level.
penslover8771 liked this.
Dec. 17, 2020 at 5:18 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 1,391
Think Blomqvist will turn into a pretty solid G.
mhockey91 and penslover8771 liked this.
Dec. 17, 2020 at 5:21 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: pharrow
really undervaluing Maniscalco and OConnor.
OConnor has torn it up everywhere he has gone.
And Maniscalco put up almost a point per game as a defenseman in the NCAA. That's a hard task for even a forward to do because of the competition level. For a defenseman that's really good.
Hell Makar who is a looking like a great defenseman only put up 1.2 roughly. So to say a guy who basically put up .9 ppg at the NCAA level is a "might turn into something" is a bit absurd.
He has the size and tools to be a solid 2RD at the NHL level.


I debated between putting Maniscalco in the tier with Nathan Legare but I figured people would give me heat on it and I didn’t wanna start that argument but yeah I agree he could potentially be a pretty impactful NHL player
Dec. 17, 2020 at 5:22 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Lights
Think Blomqvist will turn into a pretty solid G.


I still don’t love that pick. Goalies take so long to develop, even if he turns into a vezina caliber goalie (which 90% chance won’t happen), it’s not like he’ll ever be impactful with Crosby/ Malkin
Dec. 17, 2020 at 5:37 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 204
Likes: 36
Quoting: pharrow
really undervaluing Maniscalco and OConnor.
OConnor has torn it up everywhere he has gone.
And Maniscalco put up almost a point per game as a defenseman in the NCAA. That's a hard task for even a forward to do because of the competition level. For a defenseman that's really good.
Hell Makar who is a looking like a great defenseman only put up 1.2 roughly. So to say a guy who basically put up .9 ppg at the NCAA level is a "might turn into something" is a bit absurd.
He has the size and tools to be a solid 2RD at the NHL level.


O Connor is really nothing special. A senior scoring a point per game in college is common. They hardly ever amount to anything. O Connor wouldn`t even be on the radar on other teams but because Pens pool is so dry his potential is inflated.

Same with Maniscalco. I think he may have an outside chance to play decently in the NHL. But again, he was 21 years old. Makar did what he did at 18/19.

The Pens don`t have a single prospect who should excite anyone. I`m a fan of Poulin but its unlikely he is a top 6 forward if we are being honest. At least as a driving force. He could be a top 6 F with Crosby, Crosby makes AHL players top 6 forwards. So Poulin could put up points but once Crosby is gone don`t expect him to become a star - at all.

Same with POJ. Nothing spectacular.
Dec. 17, 2020 at 5:41 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Eddy
O Connor is really nothing special. A senior scoring a point per game in college is common. They hardly ever amount to anything. O Connor wouldn`t even be on the radar on other teams but because Pens pool is so dry his potential is inflated.

Same with Maniscalco. I think he may have an outside chance to play decently in the NHL. But again, he was 21 years old. Makar did what he did at 18/19.

The Pens don`t have a single prospect who should excite anyone. I`m a fan of Poulin but its unlikely he is a top 6 forward if we are being honest. At least as a driving force. He could be a top 6 F with Crosby, Crosby makes AHL players top 6 forwards. So Poulin could put up points but once Crosby is gone don`t expect him to become a star - at all.

Same with POJ. Nothing spectacular.


No one is expecting Poulin to be a star but 50-60 points is very reasonable considering his success in the Q and based off prospect rankings. POJ needs to put on some more weight but I think he could be a really solid steady puck moving D. He’s the kind of guy who needs more time similar to Dumo. Dumo was drafted in 2009 and didn’t make an impact till 2015/16
Dec. 17, 2020 at 5:44 p.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: Eddy
O Connor is really nothing special. A senior scoring a point per game in college is common. They hardly ever amount to anything. O Connor wouldn`t even be on the radar on other teams but because Pens pool is so dry his potential is inflated.

Same with Maniscalco. I think he may have an outside chance to play decently in the NHL. But again, he was 21 years old. Makar did what he did at 18/19.

The Pens don`t have a single prospect who should excite anyone. I`m a fan of Poulin but its unlikely he is a top 6 forward if we are being honest. At least as a driving force. He could be a top 6 F with Crosby, Crosby makes AHL players top 6 forwards. So Poulin could put up points but once Crosby is gone don`t expect him to become a star - at all.

Same with POJ. Nothing spectacular.


Maniscalco did what he did at 20 (the same age Makar did it in the NCAA). and again. defensemen don't score a point per game at the NCAA level. And while there are some seniors who do uptick there scoring you can look at younger guys like Iafallo who didn't do anything in those years. I don't even know why you bring up "seniors" none of these guys were seniors at the NCAA level. They played two years. And the production for 2 years for Maniscalco was great. Which explains why he was highly coveted by teams.
I will stick by my claim here. 2nd year players in the NCAA don't rack up a point per game. Far less. In a league where players tend to be older, mature, and much better competition.
The point on OConnor isn't based on just his NCAA play either. He is tearing it up in europe right now. Again, playing with adults not 16-17 year olds on teams. He's played well everywhere he's gone. He's not a guy anyone should sleep on.
Dec. 17, 2020 at 6:16 p.m.
#9
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,587
Likes: 9,660
Quoting: pharrow
Maniscalco did what he did at 20 (the same age Makar did it in the NCAA). and again. defensemen don't score a point per game at the NCAA level. And while there are some seniors who do uptick there scoring you can look at younger guys like Iafallo who didn't do anything in those years. I don't even know why you bring up "seniors" none of these guys were seniors at the NCAA level. They played two years. And the production for 2 years for Maniscalco was great. Which explains why he was highly coveted by teams.
I will stick by my claim here. 2nd year players in the NCAA don't rack up a point per game. Far less. In a league where players tend to be older, mature, and much better competition.
The point on OConnor isn't based on just his NCAA play either. He is tearing it up in europe right now. Again, playing with adults not 16-17 year olds on teams. He's played well everywhere he's gone. He's not a guy anyone should sleep on.


Feel free to be excited about your own prospect. Nothing wrong with that. I just caution you on expectations. It sounds like you think if he becomes a role player...that he's failed and that would frankly be a win.

A .9ppg rate is indeed pretty decent clip, but It's not like he's alone there. There are other guys that haven't been drafted right along side him and he wasn't even the highest scoring Dman on ASU. Ryan Shea scored at a higher rate and the Blackhawks didn't even offering him an AHL contract so he signed with the Stars. You're right that he was 21 and it's even better than he chose to leave ASU. I love ASU...also used to live there, but he's outgrown that team. ASU's schedule isn't really hard because they don't belong to a conference and then have to agree to travel schedules with teams.
mhockey91 liked this.
Dec. 17, 2020 at 6:59 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 7,987
Likes: 4,209
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
That's the cost of being the best team of the salary cap era.



You can still pick good if you are.. this clearly isn’t. Look at Vegas for example.. they are really good and they have had good picks.
Dec. 17, 2020 at 7:07 p.m.
#11
Hockey IQ
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,998
Likes: 1,481
I have one coming.....lol already had it done......hopefull it's not awful lol
Dec. 17, 2020 at 7:10 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Nhl_oilers
You can still pick good if you are.. this clearly isn’t. Look at Vegas for example.. they are really good and they have had good picks.


And how many cups do they have? It’s not an issue of pens drafting per say, it’s more of Pittsburgh trading away futures to contend. Pens have drafted Murray/Jake/Jarry/Rust/maatta/ bluegar who have all played key roles for their team.
Dec. 17, 2020 at 7:14 p.m.
#13
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 19,215
Likes: 4,837
Quoting: exo2769
Feel free to be excited about your own prospect. Nothing wrong with that. I just caution you on expectations. It sounds like you think if he becomes a role player...that he's failed and that would frankly be a win.

A .9ppg rate is indeed pretty decent clip, but It's not like he's alone there. There are other guys that haven't been drafted right along side him and he wasn't even the highest scoring Dman on ASU. Ryan Shea scored at a higher rate and the Blackhawks didn't even offering him an AHL contract so he signed with the Stars. You're right that he was 21 and it's even better than he chose to leave ASU. I love ASU...also used to live there, but he's outgrown that team. ASU's schedule isn't really hard because they don't belong to a conference and then have to agree to travel schedules with teams.


I don't expect to much from OConnor. His ceiling is 3rd line, I realize that. But he could nitch out a NHL career there aka 500+ games.
As for Maniscalco I think 2nd pairing on his is a fair expectation. If it's 3rd pairing ok, but it's not like I think he's going to be a 1RD. I don't.
I just think when everyone throws the penguins prospects under a bus and say there is nothing there, that it sells some of what they do have short. They are known for finding guys out the NCAA who end up being decent players. No none of them are going to be superstars, but that isn't really the point. They need role players as do all teams.
mhockey91 and exo2769 liked this.
Dec. 17, 2020 at 11:41 p.m.
#14
Kovid Klaw
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 779
Likes: 154
I mean, I think every NHL fan would take back to back titles over having not good prospects
mhockey91 liked this.
Dec. 18, 2020 at 12:02 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: pandemic_p
I mean, I think every NHL fan would take back to back titles over having not good prospects


Exactly lol. The whole point of having good prospects is so that you DO win cups.
Dec. 18, 2020 at 1:10 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 204
Likes: 36
Quoting: mhockey91
No one is expecting Poulin to be a star but 50-60 points is very reasonable considering his success in the Q and based off prospect rankings. POJ needs to put on some more weight but I think he could be a really solid steady puck moving D. He’s the kind of guy who needs more time similar to Dumo. Dumo was drafted in 2009 and didn’t make an impact till 2015/16


I hope Poulin can be that guy. I just think that he is only going to be that guy on Sids line and not as the main piece on his own line. I think he would be a useful player anywhere in the lineup though. Even i he amounts to nothing more than a third liner then I still think he would be nice piece.

POJ is difficult. Dumo was a great success story. I hope POJ can do the same but I don`t think he will ever get to Dumos level. Encouraging to see him getting hyped up from a size standpoint though.
mhockey91 liked this.
Dec. 18, 2020 at 2:05 p.m.
#17
FrankFurter48
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2018
Posts: 262
Likes: 65
I think Bjorkqvist and Puustinen need promoted one notch each. Other than that great list. Interesting idea.
mhockey91 liked this.
Dec. 18, 2020 at 7:51 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 1,391
Quoting: mhockey91
I still don’t love that pick. Goalies take so long to develop, even if he turns into a vezina caliber goalie (which 90% chance won’t happen), it’s not like he’ll ever be impactful with Crosby/ Malkin


Yeah I see what you mean, but you never really know how Jarry will turn out in a few years and what not (even though I'm high on him), and having a starter level G on an ELC is always nice.
mhockey91 liked this.
Dec. 18, 2020 at 9:07 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Lights
Yeah I see what you mean, but you never really know how Jarry will turn out in a few years and what not (even though I'm high on him), and having a starter level G on an ELC is always nice.


I wouldn’t be shocked if we trade him just like every other prospect tears of joy
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll