SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

One of my favorite hockey youtubers has a series

Created by: Gmonwy
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 29, 2020
Published: Dec. 29, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Its a deal or no deal and I saw this trade(100% not happening IMO but want to know your opinions.) Also post your own down below
Trades
1.
COL
  1. Lindholm, Elias
  2. 2021 2nd round pick (CGY)
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (CGY)
2.
CGY
COL
    What would flames have to add to get Landeskog?
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the EDM
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    2022
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    2023
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$81,500,000$70,160,595$0$457,500$11,339,405
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $5,350,000$5,350,000
    C
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $2,425,000$2,425,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $6,750,000$6,750,000
    LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $6,375,000$6,375,000
    C, LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $875,000$875,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
    $5,571,429$5,571,429
    LW, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $3,125,000$3,125,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
    LW, RW, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    LW, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $2,550,000$2,550,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $700,000$700,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $700,000$700,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $3,375,000$3,375,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $4,550,000$4,550,000
    RD
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $1,237,500$1,237,500
    LD
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $1,125,000$1,125,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $1,375,000$1,375,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
    LD
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $787,500$787,500
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Calgary Flames
    $700,000$700,000
    LD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Dec. 29, 2020 at 10:36 p.m.
    #1
    GO FLAMES GO
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 18,211
    Likes: 10,557
    The youtuber is Ohnyquist
    Jeuck75 liked this.
    Dec. 29, 2020 at 10:47 p.m.
    #2
    Quick
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 346
    Likes: 22
    Honestly, they should add nothing. Because Lindholm and landy are both similar (between 60 and 80 pts player, good defensivly but not the best at the same time) and also, Landy is 28 and Lindholm 26.
    Dec. 29, 2020 at 10:48 p.m.
    #3
    Thread Starter
    GO FLAMES GO
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2020
    Posts: 18,211
    Likes: 10,557
    Quoting: Hockey4ever
    Honestly, they should add nothing. Because Lindholm and landy are both similar (between 60 and 80 pts player, good defensivly but not the best at the same time) and also, Landy is 28 and Lindholm 26.


    So you think this is a fair deal?
    Dec. 29, 2020 at 11:00 p.m.
    #4
    Quick
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2019
    Posts: 346
    Likes: 22
    Quoting: Gmonwy
    So you think this is a fair deal?


    I would remove the 2nd pick tbh. The 3rd will be '' in case'' that Lindholm don't produce between 60 and 80 pts anymore when he will have join the Avs. But I don't think that he will regress at this point right now. And it would be better for the Aves to do that, because they have mackinnon who will cost a lot of $$ and so is Rantanen and Landy will ask for a lot of $$$ too. In calgary yes Johnny and tkachuck will have big paycheck, but it will not be like mac and rantanen together.
    Dec. 29, 2020 at 11:00 p.m.
    #5
    Go leafs go
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2020
    Posts: 13,179
    Likes: 9,152
    Hey, I like Ohnyquist too! He's my second favourite hockey youtubers next to Steve dangle.

    By the way, due to the fact Landy is a rental, I don't see why the flames would do that deal.
    mhockey91 liked this.
    Dec. 29, 2020 at 11:05 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2020
    Posts: 1,024
    Likes: 1,017
    If you don’t look at contract (UFA vs non-UFA) it’s close enough as a 1 for 1, but I think both teams just like their guy better and wouldn’t do it. Landy is captain and is physical, and I think Lindholm has really taken a step forward with Calgary and is good on the defensive side of the puck differently than Landeskog.
    Dec. 29, 2020 at 11:28 p.m.
    #7
    CGY
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2015
    Posts: 5,538
    Likes: 2,064
    I would say no.

    Reason being, Landeskog has 1 yr left, Lindholm 4.

    In a flat cap world, Lindholm at 4.8 makes way more sense than paying Landeskog north of 6. Especially when you factor in that the Flames have almost no quality RHS either on the roster or in the system.
    mhockey91, Alfie11 and brocklesnar liked this.
    Dec. 30, 2020 at 12:56 a.m.
    #8
    MisstheWhalers
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2019
    Posts: 23,558
    Likes: 12,311
    This would be a dumb move for the Flames.
    Dec. 30, 2020 at 4:35 a.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2017
    Posts: 9,288
    Likes: 4,398
    Bad move for the Flames for the points made above but I also think the Avs would decline it too. It's basically a swap and Colorado loses its skipper. Seems pretty pointless to me.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll