I think Guentzel is a more significant player than Laine right now & he is signed longer.

Winnipeg and Columbus say no.

Fair value. Only reason WPG says no is due to need. You may even be overvaluing Laine/undervaluing Guentzel.
WPG needs to upgrade the blue line or at C if they trade Laine.

Why would the Pens trade Guentzel, who makes 6M per for the next 4 years, for a RFA who is gonna want a fortune next year?? Plus add drafts picks?? Lol.

Guentzel for Laine is a lateral move(if the contracts were the same, which they arnt).

Guentzel had 76 points in his 3rd year in 18-19 and on pace for 80 plus last year b4 he got tripped from behind and fell into the boards and need shoulder surgery last year.

Laine = Guentzel. Guentzel = good contract. Laine = RFA, contract is gonna be a tooth an nail fight!!

With a extension and Laine getting 6-7M per the next 5 years. Then ya, fair trade. Not as a RFA though.

I'm still gawking

KEEP GUENTZEL.

I would take PLD and Guentzel over Laine.

Horrible trade for the Penguins.

Why is WPG even involved here?
If you want to move Jake for PLD just do that trade. No reason for WPG to be involved here. There is no difference here.
As for that trade, I don't see CBJ making it. Nor does it make sense for the penguins. PLD is a number 1 center and you don't trade those for wingers. You aren't going to take a number 1 center and put him on the 3rd freaking line.