Tell that to Cf thanks for the insult bud. Very very fitting. Especially for someone getting annoyed that I'm putting up stats because
Quoting: TheFlamingC
Game was harder to play in the 80s, Gaudreau style players are way better now. Just because you are too stupid to understand my analogies doesn’t make them dumb. So basically, these graphs tell me that Calgary scores 0.03 more goals every game with Gaudreau off the ice than on it? That’s about 2 extra a year. Wow. Now I’m convinced. He’s atrocious. Those are also only 5 on 5 and that’s where analytics fail. They don’t acknowledge the time you spent on the PP. That is a failure in it because when you are on the PP, you are reducing your legs to play 5 on 5. At the end of the day, the eye test is far superior to the algebraic model according 5 on 5 shots for and against with the assumption of 2 backcheckers on a 2 on 0 or some stupid analytics bull. You can say he’s a PP specialist but he generates way more points 5 on 5 than PP. I don’t think he’s top 5 in the world, he’s not top 20. McDavid, MacKinnon, Draisaitl, Crosby, Barkov, Matthews, Eichel, Malkin, Pettersen, Barzal, Panarin, Stone, Kane, Pastrnak, Tkachuk, Lindholm, ROR, Couturier, Huberdeau, Marner, Scheifele, Connor, Marchand, Ovechkin, Zibanejad, Point, Kucherov, Stamkos, Aho, Teravainen, Svechnikov, Dubois, Rantanen are all better and that’s just forwards. He might be top 30 forwards. Maybe. But he’s better than Tarasenko. You just told me that I’m gonna call you names but I haven’t called you a single name yet and you called me a homer this whole time. I’ll stop trying to be civil considering that you have no life at all and spent the last week flying off the rails about an argument with somebody you met online and believe is an idiot. At least I kept it civil and it didn’t affect my well-being when your probably had aneurysm. Buddy, you’re a f*cking moron who has never watched enough hockey to understand that a red and blue graph determining 5 v 5 goals to the decimal without accounting outside factors determines a players entire value. You’ve also probably never played a shift because you don’t understand improvement and hard work and playing hockey actually does increase your ability to understand it. You don’t need it but sometimes it can’t be replaced. In conclusion, go f*ck yourself and get a life
and look at the bottom another one. What are you like 7? I have a life, and it's more of one then you will ever know about. High School kid who has this fandom of Gaudreau. The ONE person out of everyone else in these comments said they agree with you well done you want a f*ckin cookie? You didn't even read the rest of my comments. I said he was a POWERPLAY SPECIALIST. You calling me dumb, you are illiterate apparently. Yeah an eye test and analytic combined is the best which by what you are telling me you only pay attention to he shoots he either saves it or gets a goal. NOW you say PP specialist, okay again, Blues are fine on the powerplay we need 5v5 goals, but you don't know enough about the blues. you only pay attention to calgary, and I don't even think you pay attention to them. Funny thing is I played hockey for over 9 years, and I coached for 4. You can't tell a puck from the sh*t that comes out your ass. I understand enough that Blues are built around dump and pickup and you have to be strong on the puck behind the net tiring out teams that's what Blues are good at and they do it very well. Gaudreau finesse, I'm going to take it up the ice and hope I get a shot off before I have to do anything else oop what do you know puck was lost, and he's not even strong enough to hold the puck behind the net he's not a grinder he's a finesse forward. 5"9 165 f*ckin pounds isn't gonna do anything trying to stay strong on the puck behind the net, and sure as hell doesn't do what Blues are really good at forecheck he couldn't knock a guy off the puck for sh*t. Tarasenko is 6"0 225 pounds and is really solid on the puck. Again you wanna know why I know Gaudreau won't work. Robby Fabbri is the same player he was crap here and he's doing better in detroit. So try me again as a "****" just because Blues value Tarasenko more doesn't mean he's better. I said Blues wouldn't do this trade because "BLUES VALUE TARASENKO MORE" he's more effective than Gaudreau would be. The common thing among Blues players our smallest forward is 5"10 190 pounds. Fabbri was the smallest one before he got traded. So say I don't know my team for sh*t, but like I said you can't teach a guy who wants the puck on his stick 90% of the time, how to grind behind the boards with a dump n chase when he's so f*cking small. So again please call me out on sh*t I don't say. Who's really the **** now, because I gave you multiple reason, he is less effective on the ice, he's a PP speciallist when if you listened to Blues fans said specifically a 5v5 Goal Scorer Gaudreau is not that, someone who is again Cost efficient, and someone who people won't ask an arm and a leg for a scrub production when you are getting 6.5M per year,
The only thing you could come up with is Wayne Gretzky, Idk advanced analytics so i'm going to scrutinize it, and calling me a **** for knowing my own team better than a f*cking Calgary 15 year old fanboy does. I've been watching the Blues for over 20 years. You've been watching Calgary for how long? So please please watch what you say on here. You are making yourself look stupid. Can't name how many people have called me one of the most knowledgable blues fans on here when it comes to analytics, theory, logistic, ideals, team scheme systems, player build, and how players will be effective on the the Blues the team I have had season tickets for the past 10 years, and have not missed a Blues game in over 15 years. Difference between Blues and Flames, Blues aren't a flashy team that gets tired and can't play defense, inconsistent, and not physical enough to wear teams out in playoffs. You have a team that is very good in season and terrible in playoffs. Tarasenko "has a bum shoulder" yeah but after every single shoulder surgery he's still consistently put up 65 points+ Gaudreau works for your team because he scores for YOUR PP, he wouldn't work on ours I'll tell you why, Blues cycle, Gaudreau likes to run the PP on his own when they score or he finds someone else. Blues aren't a 1T team, they are a dirty tipping team on PP.
So where you fail to realize is yes I'm bring up statlines, but I can't bring up logistic reasons on scheme because a **** like you would be like OOOOOOHHH he has 99 points he's worth every f*ckin player on your team, and he's gonna do so well for you so we should get more. It's why Pietrangelo would have been bad on Toronto, that's why Karlsson doesn't really work in San Jose unless they build around him, it's why some players like Taylor Hall don't work well on Arizona. It's why Kessel is crap in Arizona, it's why Galchenyuk sucks when he isn't in the built scheme system that Montreal had. But who am I to tell the all knowing FlamingL what I know. How dare I defy what he says because it goes against what he wants, how dare I go against his wishes, how dare I make him become butthurt, well at this point couple things, grow a pair, telling me how I don't have a life, funny thing is you are the one making an argument with insults left and right I can be just as uncivilized as you. I've done it before. But someone told me something you can't fix stupid which is example one right here this guy named TheFlamingC kid. and 2 opinions are like assholes everyone has one.
But I think you are just to daft to understand any mechanics in the NHL. You can't teach winning atmosphere, you teach a winning gameplan ****, something your team hasn't learned yet. If you wanna be a f*ckin moron this is the right place for you, but you just joined my minimal list of incompetent hockey casuals. So thanks for the convo and have a fun time observing the season unfold, but yeah I don't speak stupid so at this point I've already lost enough brain cells from you.