SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Opening Night W

Created by: revaze15
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 8, 2021
Published: Jan. 8, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I don't like Holl.
Trades
TOR
    To literally anyone for a draft pick I don't care.
    Retained Salary Transactions
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2021
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2022
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    2023
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    Logo of the TOR
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    22$81,500,000$80,790,575$0$0$709,425
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $700,000$700,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,640,250$11,640,250
    C
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $10,903,000$10,903,000
    RW
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $900,000$900,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    C, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $6,962,366$6,962,366
    RW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, C, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $2,250,000$2,250,000
    RW, LW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,645,000$1,645,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $700,000$700,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    RW, LW
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $821,667$821,667
    LW, RW
    RFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $925,000$925,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LD/RD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $874,125$874,125
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,650,000$1,650,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RD
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $925,000$925,000
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $894,167$894,167
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Taxi Squad
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
    RW
    RFA - 3

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 8:44 a.m.
    #1
    Glep
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Sep. 2018
    Posts: 2,391
    Likes: 911
    ah yes because u can play 13 forwards and 7 defensemen on opening night.
    Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 9:03 a.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Hockey Expert
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 256
    Likes: 47
    Quoting: Hurricanes73
    ah yes because u can play 13 forwards and 7 defensemen on opening night.


    I put the scratches in the wrong spot whats it to ya?
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 9:40 a.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 15,475
    Likes: 6,414
    Good luck with the opening night win thing. the 1st line will be like playing on the PK all night. Thornton is too slow to play on the top line, If he has to constantly play against Drouin-Suzuki-Anderson or Tatar-Danault-Gallagher he will most likely be in for a long night. Hell even if he has to play against Toffoli-Kotkaniemi-Armia he may have a hard time keeping up.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 9:45 a.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 11,202
    Likes: 5,207
    Quoting: Campabee
    Good luck with the opening night win thing. the 1st line will be like playing on the PK all night. Thornton is too slow to play on the top line, If he has to constantly play against Drouin-Suzuki-Anderson or Tatar-Danault-Gallagher he will most likely be in for a long night. Hell even if he has to play against Toffoli-Kotkaniemi-Armia he may have a hard time keeping up.


    Both the Leafs and Habs have a 4th liner on their first line. difference is one signed for 700kx1yr, the other signed 5.5Mx7yr.

    Also... lol. Suzuki is about to get man-handled by Matthews, Drouin is a middle 6 winger at best these days, and Marner will dominate that line as well.
    Tatar - Danault - Gallagher will also be in tough against Tavares and Nylander. Good luck.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 9:54 a.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 15,475
    Likes: 6,414
    Quoting: leafs101
    Both the Leafs and Habs have a 4th liner on their first line. difference is one signed for 700kx1yr, the other signed 5.5Mx7yr.

    Also... lol. Suzuki is about to get man-handled by Matthews, Drouin is a middle 6 winger at best these days, and Marner will dominate that line as well.
    Tatar - Danault - Gallagher will also be in tough against Tavares and Nylander. Good luck.


    Not sure how you see as a 4th liner on Montreal's top line but ok! Remind me which team won all three games last season? Right, the Habs did and they out scored Toronto 14-5 in doing so! Yup the Leafs top line sure did manhandle ours last year LMAO! Matthews may have a size advantage but lets face it he couldn't handle Danault last season but somehow you expect him to handle Suzuki who has 1000x more skill LMAO!
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 9:58 a.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 11,202
    Likes: 5,207
    Quoting: Campabee
    Not sure how you see as a 4th liner on Montreal's top line but ok! Remind me which team won all three games last season? Right, the Habs did and they out scored Toronto 14-5 in doing so! Yup the Leafs top line sure did manhandle ours last year LMAO! Matthews may have a size advantage but lets face it he couldn't handle Danault last season but somehow you expect him to handle Suzuki who has 1000x more skill LMAO!


    I consider Josh Anderson a fourth liner because he literally fits that build - a bruiser that scored 4 points in 26 games. New season, new acquisitions. Matthews scored a point per game vs habs, he did fine. Suzuki more skill than Matthews? What a joke like you can't be serious.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:08 a.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 15,475
    Likes: 6,414
    Quoting: leafs101
    I consider Josh Anderson a fourth liner because he literally fits that build - a bruiser that scored 4 points in 26 games. New season, new acquisitions. Matthews scored a point per game vs habs, he did fine. Suzuki more skill than Matthews? What a joke like you can't be serious.


    With an injured shoulder! the season before he had 27 goals that is NOT a 4th liner. If it does that must mean that Nylander is a 4th liner too cause he had 7 goals and 20 assists in 54 games in 18-19! Umm, where did I say more skill than Matthews? I said Suzuki had 1000x more skill than Danault!
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:17 a.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Hockey Expert
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 256
    Likes: 47
    Quoting: Campabee
    With an injured shoulder! the season before he had 27 goals that is NOT a 4th liner. If it does that must mean that Nylander is a 4th liner too cause he had 7 goals and 20 assists in 54 games in 18-19! Umm, where did I say more skill than Matthews? I said Suzuki had 1000x more skill than Danault!


    Why are you talking about Nylander during his contract holdout year? Nylander finished last season with 31 goals and 28 assists where he was also 12th in even strength goals. Nice try though.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:18 a.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 11,202
    Likes: 5,207
    Quoting: Campabee
    With an injured shoulder! the season before he had 27 goals that is NOT a 4th liner. If it does that must mean that Nylander is a 4th liner too cause he had 7 goals and 20 assists in 54 games in 18-19! Umm, where did I say more skill than Matthews? I said Suzuki had 1000x more skill than Danault!


    my bad, misread that. I mean literally Danault is more valuable than an average 2nd liner solely because of his defence so if "containing" Matthews to a point per game is a feat Suzuki will have more trouble with it than Danault.

    In Nylander's worst year he scored on a pace of 41 points in 82 games. Anderson's best season he scored 47 in 82 (following it up with a sub-par 3 points in 10 playoff games). Anderson's worst (and most recent year), he scored at a 13 point in 82 game clip. Nylander scored at a 72 point in 82 game pace. See my trend here? Nylander's worst season is still a decent one for Anderson. Even in his best year he produced middle 6 F numbers. Anderson deserved a one year, 2.5ish million dollar deal to prove that he can earn like 4ish mil, not a 7 year 5.5 mil. People criticize the Leafs contracts but this is by far worse than any of ours. Marner is typically the contract scapegoat - I'd still prefer to overpay a 94 point 22 year old by like 1.5 mil than lock myself into 5.5x7 with a bottom 6 F who has not proven himself to be anything better yet.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:20 a.m.
    #10
    Thread Starter
    Hockey Expert
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 256
    Likes: 47
    Quoting: leafs101
    my bad, misread that. I mean literally Danault is more valuable than an average 2nd liner solely because of his defence so if "containing" Matthews to a point per game is a feat Suzuki will have more trouble with it than Danault.

    In Nylander's worst year he scored on a pace of 41 points in 82 games. Anderson's best season he scored 47 in 82 (following it up with a sub-par 3 points in 10 playoff games). Anderson's worst (and most recent year), he scored at a 13 point in 82 game clip. Nylander scored at a 72 point in 82 game pace. See my trend here? Nylander's worst season is still a decent one for Anderson. Even in his best year he produced middle 6 F numbers. Anderson deserved a one year, 2.5ish million dollar deal to prove that he can earn like 4ish mil, not a 7 year 5.5 mil. People criticize the Leafs contracts but this is by far worse than any of ours. Marner is typically the contract scapegoat - I'd still prefer to overpay a 94 point 22 year old by like 1.5 mil than lock myself into 5.5x7 with a bottom 6 F who has not proven himself to be anything better yet.


    Finally someone that speaks my language
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:23 a.m.
    #11
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: Campabee
    Good luck with the opening night win thing. the 1st line will be like playing on the PK all night. Thornton is too slow to play on the top line, If he has to constantly play against Drouin-Suzuki-Anderson or Tatar-Danault-Gallagher he will most likely be in for a long night. Hell even if he has to play against Toffoli-Kotkaniemi-Armia he may have a hard time keeping up.


    Because any of those players are going to be able to handle Matthews, Marner, Nylander or JT. Thorton isn't slow, he just doesn't have any quickness which doesn't matter because Matthews and Marner make up for that.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:24 a.m.
    #12
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: Campabee
    Not sure how you see as a 4th liner on Montreal's top line but ok! Remind me which team won all three games last season? Right, the Habs did and they out scored Toronto 14-5 in doing so! Yup the Leafs top line sure did manhandle ours last year LMAO! Matthews may have a size advantage but lets face it he couldn't handle Danault last season but somehow you expect him to handle Suzuki who has 1000x more skill LMAO!


    You are going to be awfully quiet very soon. And I am going to love it, unfortunately the Habs won't get to play against Hutchinson twice this year.
    revaze15 liked this.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:26 a.m.
    #13
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: Campabee
    With an injured shoulder! the season before he had 27 goals that is NOT a 4th liner. If it does that must mean that Nylander is a 4th liner too cause he had 7 goals and 20 assists in 54 games in 18-19! Umm, where did I say more skill than Matthews? I said Suzuki had 1000x more skill than Danault!


    Remember that time Cheechoo scored 50 goals? Maybe you should have signed him too. Anderson is not going to be the big 30 goal scorer he's billed as. At best I think he'll have 2 or 3 20+ goal 40 point seasons and the rest will be 15 goals and 30 points and you'll regret the signing because better players will force him down the lineup and the contract will be terrible. You are such a homer.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:28 a.m.
    #14
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Also the anti Holl group are just ridiculous. The guy is a good number 4 who makes 2 million a season. That is great value! Trading him for nothing because he didn't look good for 5 games while playing with Marincin and asked to shut down the oppositions best is literally the dumbest mentality anyone can have.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:32 a.m.
    #15
    Thread Starter
    Hockey Expert
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 256
    Likes: 47
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
    Also the anti Holl group are just ridiculous. The guy is a good number 4 who makes 2 million a season. That is great value! Trading him for nothing because he didn't look good for 5 games while playing with Marincin and asked to shut down the oppositions best is literally the dumbest mentality anyone can have.


    I have never liked Holl, I find Dermott to be much better. Just my opinion tho.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:33 a.m.
    #16
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: revaze15
    I have never liked Holl, I find Dermott to be much better. Just my opinion tho.


    I like Dermott as well, both are good.
    revaze15 liked this.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:36 a.m.
    #17
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 15,475
    Likes: 6,414
    Quoting: leafs101
    my bad, misread that. I mean literally Danault is more valuable than an average 2nd liner solely because of his defence so if "containing" Matthews to a point per game is a feat Suzuki will have more trouble with it than Danault.

    In Nylander's worst year he scored on a pace of 41 points in 82 games. Anderson's best season he scored 47 in 82 (following it up with a sub-par 3 points in 10 playoff games). Anderson's worst (and most recent year), he scored at a 13 point in 82 game clip. Nylander scored at a 72 point in 82 game pace. See my trend here? Nylander's worst season is still a decent one for Anderson. Even in his best year he produced middle 6 F numbers. Anderson deserved a one year, 2.5ish million dollar deal to prove that he can earn like 4ish mil, not a 7 year 5.5 mil. People criticize the Leafs contracts but this is by far worse than any of ours. Marner is typically the contract scapegoat - I'd still prefer to overpay a 94 point 22 year old by like 1.5 mil than lock myself into 5.5x7 with a bottom 6 F who has not proven himself to be anything better yet.


    Not really Suzuki contained both Crosby and Malkin just fine in the playoffs, Matthews is equal to them maybe a step below Crosby.

    I don't disagree about the contract Anderson got but 2 things come into play there, 1. I imagine when the deal was made the Blue Jackets had to agree that it was contingent on Anderson passing a physical by the Montreal doctors. 2. He passed his physical and was given an assurance that there would be no lingering side effects. As for points you skipped a year. Nylander's worst season was his rookie season where he put up 6 goals 7 assists for 13 points in 22 games almost the exact same as Anderson put up in the same number of games with an injured shoulder. Hmm, it seems like you like to compare apples to oranges as long as it suits your narrative. Instead of taking last season as an outlier for Anderson you want everyone to believe it is the norm. Sure he has not had the same kind of career as Nylander but to say he is a 4th liner based on one season where he only played 26 games and was never 100% is rediculous.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:41 a.m.
    #18
    Thread Starter
    Hockey Expert
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 256
    Likes: 47
    Quoting: Campabee
    Not really Suzuki contained both Crosby and Malkin just fine in the playoffs, Matthews is equal to them maybe a step below Crosby.

    I don't disagree about the contract Anderson got but 2 things come into play there, 1. I imagine when the deal was made the Blue Jackets had to agree that it was contingent on Anderson passing a physical by the Montreal doctors. 2. He passed his physical and was given an assurance that there would be no lingering side effects. As for points you skipped a year. Nylander's worst season was his rookie season where he put up 6 goals 7 assists for 13 points in 22 games almost the exact same as Anderson put up in the same number of games with an injured shoulder. Hmm, it seems like you like to compare apples to oranges as long as it suits your narrative. Instead of taking last season as an outlier for Anderson you want everyone to believe it is the norm. Sure he has not had the same kind of career as Nylander but to say he is a 4th liner based on one season where he only played 26 games and was never 100% is rediculous.


    You traded away Domi and a 3rd round draft pick for Anderson. What you gave up for him and the contract you gave him makes him look like he is a consistent 30+ goal scorer which he isn't. You lost that trade by far.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:45 a.m.
    #19
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 15,475
    Likes: 6,414
    Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
    Because any of those players are going to be able to handle Matthews, Marner, Nylander or JT. Thorton isn't slow, he just doesn't have any quickness which doesn't matter because Matthews and Marner make up for that.


    Umm, they did just fine last season handling them! Thornton is slow both in top speed and quickness, he does not belong in the top 6 at this point in his career. You kind of just said exactly what I said in the beginning which was " the 1st line will be like playing on the PK all night". Matthews and Marner have to cover their own guys they cannot be expected to cover an additional guy all night cause Thornton can't keep up. That would be too taxing on them, which means either the Leafs don't play them as much or they are worn down by the third period. IMO it is just not a great strategy to play Thornton on the top line, Hyman did an excellent job there last year why change that now?
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:49 a.m.
    #20
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 11,202
    Likes: 5,207
    Quoting: Campabee
    Not really Suzuki contained both Crosby and Malkin just fine in the playoffs, Matthews is equal to them maybe a step below Crosby.

    I don't disagree about the contract Anderson got but 2 things come into play there, 1. I imagine when the deal was made the Blue Jackets had to agree that it was contingent on Anderson passing a physical by the Montreal doctors. 2. He passed his physical and was given an assurance that there would be no lingering side effects. As for points you skipped a year. Nylander's worst season was his rookie season where he put up 6 goals 7 assists for 13 points in 22 games almost the exact same as Anderson put up in the same number of games with an injured shoulder. Hmm, it seems like you like to compare apples to oranges as long as it suits your narrative. Instead of taking last season as an outlier for Anderson you want everyone to believe it is the norm. Sure he has not had the same kind of career as Nylander but to say he is a 4th liner based on one season where he only played 26 games and was never 100% is rediculous.


    "To be considered a rookie, a player must not have played in more than 25 NHL games in any preceding seasons". Nylander played 22 games. Not his rookie season. I hardly count that. But sure, that season actually puts him at a 48 point in 82 game pace, one point more than Anderson's top year. So sure, call that his worst season. Its not "almost the exact same as Anderson put up in the same number of games with an injured shoulder", 4 points in 26 is a big difference from that.

    Anderson was a consistent third line producer before the last two years. He had one year where he was a bit better, one where he was a lot worse. He's probably a third liner. So my "4th liner" might be harsh (though he was in his most recent season), but he is a bottom 6 F. And now he's making 5.5mil x 7.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:50 a.m.
    #21
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 15,475
    Likes: 6,414
    Quoting: revaze15
    You traded away Domi and a 3rd round draft pick for Anderson. What you gave up for him and the contract you gave him makes him look like he is a consistent 30+ goal scorer which he isn't. You lost that trade by far.


    Hey I never said the trade was good or that the contract made sense. There is no denying that MB undersells his players then gives out bad contracts to others. Quite honestly IMO he is one of the worst GM's in the league but that is another discussion lol. The comment above was Anderson was a 4th liner simply because he had 1 really bad season due to an injury, that is ridiculous to suggest.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 10:51 a.m.
    #22
    Thread Starter
    Hockey Expert
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 256
    Likes: 47
    Quoting: Campabee
    Umm, they did just fine last season handling them! Thornton is slow both in top speed and quickness, he does not belong in the top 6 at this point in his career. You kind of just said exactly what I said in the beginning which was " the 1st line will be like playing on the PK all night". Matthews and Marner have to cover their own guys they cannot be expected to cover an additional guy all night cause Thornton can't keep up. That would be too taxing on them, which means either the Leafs don't play them as much or they are worn down by the third period. IMO it is just not a great strategy to play Thornton on the top line, Hyman did an excellent job there last year why change that now?


    Keefe clearly knows something we don't. They have also publicly stated that Thornton is much faster than one would think. If he can't keep up he will quickly be dropped down the lineup.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 11:04 a.m.
    #23
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2018
    Posts: 15,475
    Likes: 6,414
    Quoting: leafs101
    "To be considered a rookie, a player must not have played in more than 25 NHL games in any preceding seasons". Nylander played 22 games. Not his rookie season. I hardly count that. But sure, that season actually puts him at a 48 point in 82 game pace, one point more than Anderson's top year. So sure, call that his worst season. Its not "almost the exact same as Anderson put up in the same number of games with an injured shoulder", 4 points in 26 is a big difference from that.

    Anderson was a consistent third line producer before the last two years. He had one year where he was a bit better, one where he was a lot worse. He's probably a third liner. So my "4th liner" might be harsh (though he was in his most recent season), but he is a bottom 6 F. And now he's making 5.5mil x 7.


    My point is many power forwards don't put up the same kinds of numbers as a pure sniper or a setup player. That doesn't mean that a power forward is not a top 6 player. Would I have given Anderson that contract? Absolutely not, like you said he should have been given a 1 year deal worth around 2.5-3 Mil but MB gives out ridiculous contracts based on god knows what logic he has.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 12:09 p.m.
    #24
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: Campabee
    Umm, they did just fine last season handling them! Thornton is slow both in top speed and quickness, he does not belong in the top 6 at this point in his career. You kind of just said exactly what I said in the beginning which was " the 1st line will be like playing on the PK all night". Matthews and Marner have to cover their own guys they cannot be expected to cover an additional guy all night cause Thornton can't keep up. That would be too taxing on them, which means either the Leafs don't play them as much or they are worn down by the third period. IMO it is just not a great strategy to play Thornton on the top line, Hyman did an excellent job there last year why change that now?


    The top line is going to have the puck all night. Matthews and Thorton will be so hard to handle on cycle and with Marner dancing around as well it'll look like a powerplay. The Leafs new 3rd line of Hyman, Kerfoot and Mikheyev will slow down your top line and that will mean that one of JT or Matthews will play your 3rd line and that is going to he just a wrecking ball all night. Face it, you just don't have the top end talent to compete.
    Jan. 8, 2021 at 12:24 p.m.
    #25
    Banned
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 24,997
    Likes: 7,855
    Quoting: leafs101
    my bad, misread that. I mean literally Danault is more valuable than an average 2nd liner solely because of his defence so if "containing" Matthews to a point per game is a feat Suzuki will have more trouble with it than Danault.

    In Nylander's worst year he scored on a pace of 41 points in 82 games. Anderson's best season he scored 47 in 82 (following it up with a sub-par 3 points in 10 playoff games). Anderson's worst (and most recent year), he scored at a 13 point in 82 game clip. Nylander scored at a 72 point in 82 game pace. See my trend here? Nylander's worst season is still a decent one for Anderson. Even in his best year he produced middle 6 F numbers. Anderson deserved a one year, 2.5ish million dollar deal to prove that he can earn like 4ish mil, not a 7 year 5.5 mil. People criticize the Leafs contracts but this is by far worse than any of ours. Marner is typically the contract scapegoat - I'd still prefer to overpay a 94 point 22 year old by like 1.5 mil than lock myself into 5.5x7 with a bottom 6 F who has not proven himself to be anything better yet.


    Right? Capfriendly logic - Marner is paid way too much but Anderson is a good contract as is a guy like Skinner.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll