SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Shedding Term Ideas

Created by: Fox_Czar_Cup
Team: 2016-17 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 22, 2016
Published: Nov. 30, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Philu069, don't shed tears! Better now & next year.
Trades
1.
2.
NYR
  1. Donskoi, Joonas
  2. Marleau, Patrick
  3. 2017 6th round pick (SJS)
  4. 2017 6th round pick (ARI)
SJS
  1. Lindberg, Oscar
  2. Nash, Rick
  3. 2018 7th round pick (FLA)
3.
NYR
  1. Duchene, Matt
  2. Gelinas, Eric
  3. 2017 4th round pick (NYR)
COL
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the NYR
2018
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2019
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$73,000,000$66,645,834$0$3,062,500$6,354,166
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LW
UFA - 4
$2,625,000$2,625,000
C
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$1,650,000$1,650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$2,600,000$2,600,000
C
UFA - 2
$2,750,000$2,750,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
$950,000$950,000
RW
UFA - 1
$6,666,667$6,666,667
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
RW
UFA - 1
$600,000$600,000
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,700,000$4,700,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
$8,500,000$8,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 5
$5,700,000$5,700,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
$1,650,000$1,650,000
LD
UFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
G
UFA - 2
$1,416,667$1,416,667
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 2
$1,575,000$1,575,000
LD
UFA - 1
$787,500$787,500
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 30, 2016 at 10:11 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 20,030
Likes: 12,187
Nope, hard pass.
A waiver wire pick up and PTO are not sweetners to move duchene.
Nov. 30, 2016 at 11:30 a.m.
#2
The KZB
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 89
Likes: 3
You really haven't changed, Nashless...

1. Hurricanes won't accept Klein and Clendening in exchange for Hainsey and Murphy. Clendening is an unproven rookie and Klein is just bad.

2. I have no idea what your problem with Nash is, but that Sharks trade is abysmal. Firstly, Nash still has 1st line potential. Trading him for someone who you've put on the fourth line is just downright stupid. As for the second part of that deal, I have no idea how you think the Sharks would take Lindberg for Donskoi (and if you say because of the Nash/Marleau exchange, it isn't worth it).

3. The Avalanche aren't giving up Duchene, and if they were it definitely wouldn't be at that price.
Nov. 30, 2016 at 1:04 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 147
Telling me not to shed a tear is stupid as hell... all I Did was ask you to try and use your brain and do REALISTIC trades and not move the entire team. You make a bunch of trade ideas and some are good but the fact that you then add 2 or 3 awful trade ideas makes the entire post look bad. I am challenging you Nashless to make a team with some legitimate ideas because I know you can and I actually think it'd be pretty good.
Nov. 30, 2016 at 4:20 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 8,289
Likes: 1,501
Quoting: KreiderToBuchnevich
You really haven't changed, Nashless...

1. Hurricanes won't accept Klein and Clendening in exchange for Hainsey and Murphy. Clendening is an unproven rookie and Klein is just bad.

2. I have no idea what your problem with Nash is, but that Sharks trade is abysmal. Firstly, Nash still has 1st line potential. Trading him for someone who you've put on the fourth line is just downright stupid. As for the second part of that deal, I have no idea how you think the Sharks would take Lindberg for Donskoi (and if you say because of the Nash/Marleau exchange, it isn't worth it).

3. The Avalanche aren't giving up Duchene, and if they were it definitely wouldn't be at that price.
1. Murphy is not nhler, are they really going to resign Hainsey? Klein is having a hard time right now, but we all know gm's would line up for him at dl.
2. Contradicting yourself! Ps...it's all about the contracts, shed Nash from next year.
3. Whatever, keep him...
Dec. 1, 2016 at 12:38 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 8,289
Likes: 1,501
You clowns are crazy! This is good for All teams. Colorado less-so, yet Step is having a fruitful career and Duchene is overhyped.
Dec. 2, 2016 at 11:07 a.m.
#6
The KZB
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 89
Likes: 3
Quoting: nashless
Quoting: KreiderToBuchnevich
You really haven't changed, Nashless...

1. Hurricanes won't accept Klein and Clendening in exchange for Hainsey and Murphy. Clendening is an unproven rookie and Klein is just bad.

2. I have no idea what your problem with Nash is, but that Sharks trade is abysmal. Firstly, Nash still has 1st line potential. Trading him for someone who you've put on the fourth line is just downright stupid. As for the second part of that deal, I have no idea how you think the Sharks would take Lindberg for Donskoi (and if you say because of the Nash/Marleau exchange, it isn't worth it).

3. The Avalanche aren't giving up Duchene, and if they were it definitely wouldn't be at that price.
1. Murphy is not nhler, are they really going to resign Hainsey? Klein is having a hard time right now, but we all know gm's would line up for him at dl.
2. Contradicting yourself! Ps...it's all about the contracts, shed Nash from next year.
3. Whatever, keep him...


1. No one is lining up for Klein right now since he's played terribly.

2. If Nash keeps up the way he's playing right now, then there is no reason we should be trying to get rid of him for such a lousy price. And again, Lindberg for Donskoi would never happen.

3. What does that mean?
Dec. 2, 2016 at 6:28 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 8,289
Likes: 1,501
Quoting: KreiderToBuchnevich
Quoting: nashless
Quoting: KreiderToBuchnevich
You really haven't changed, Nashless...

1. Hurricanes won't accept Klein and Clendening in exchange for Hainsey and Murphy. Clendening is an unproven rookie and Klein is just bad.

2. I have no idea what your problem with Nash is, but that Sharks trade is abysmal. Firstly, Nash still has 1st line potential. Trading him for someone who you've put on the fourth line is just downright stupid. As for the second part of that deal, I have no idea how you think the Sharks would take Lindberg for Donskoi (and if you say because of the Nash/Marleau exchange, it isn't worth it).

3. The Avalanche aren't giving up Duchene, and if they were it definitely wouldn't be at that price.
1. Murphy is not nhler, are they really going to resign Hainsey? Klein is having a hard time right now, but we all know gm's would line up for him at dl.
2. Contradicting yourself! Ps...it's all about the contracts, shed Nash from next year.
3. Whatever, keep him...


1. No one is lining up for Klein right now since he's played terribly.

2. If Nash keeps up the way he's playing right now, then there is no reason we should be trying to get rid of him for such a lousy price. And again, Lindberg for Donskoi would never happen.

3. What does that mean?
Ughhhhhh...
Dec. 3, 2016 at 2:38 a.m.
#8
The KZB
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 89
Likes: 3
Quoting: nashless
Quoting: KreiderToBuchnevich


1. No one is lining up for Klein right now since he's played terribly.

2. If Nash keeps up the way he's playing right now, then there is no reason we should be trying to get rid of him for such a lousy price. And again, Lindberg for Donskoi would never happen.

3. What does that mean?
Ughhhhhh...


You think you're frustrated with me? Really? Honestly, I don't get what's up with your stubborn obsession with trading Nash or trading for Marleau . Neither are a good idea, yet you, for some reason, seem convinced that those moves would win us the cup (they won't), or at the very least help us get closer (which they wouldn't be).
Dec. 3, 2016 at 7:49 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 8,289
Likes: 1,501
Rinse, repeat......
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll