yeah this do be sanderson pretty easily at this point, tough to go guhle when their only play time since sanderson was ranked higher by everyone and taken earlier in the draft is at the wjc, where guhle was alright but sanderson dominated
yeah this do be sanderson pretty easily at this point, tough to go guhle when their only play time since sanderson was ranked higher by everyone and taken earlier in the draft is at the wjc, where guhle was alright but sanderson dominated
yeah this do be sanderson pretty easily at this point, tough to go guhle when their only play time since sanderson was ranked higher by everyone and taken earlier in the draft is at the wjc, where guhle was alright but sanderson dominated
there isn't an argument for who is better but Guhle was more than alright in the tournament
Both are high risk high reward. I could see both swim or both sink.
How is Guhle high-risk? He’s one of the safest picks we could’ve made. He’s not flashy but he has a lot of attributes that will translate to the NHL. IDK about his ceiling, but he’s definitely an NHLer.
How is Guhle high-risk? He’s one of the safest picks we could’ve made. He’s not flashy but he has a lot of attributes that will translate to the NHL. IDK about his ceiling, but he’s definitely an NHLer.
How is Guhle high-risk? He’s one of the safest picks we could’ve made. He’s not flashy but he has a lot of attributes that will translate to the NHL. IDK about his ceiling, but he’s definitely an NHLer.
Doesn’t have a high ceiling, as you’ve said, so there’s reason to believe he very well could flop.
Doesn’t have a high ceiling, as you’ve said, so there’s reason to believe he very well could flop.
He has just as little chance of flopping as anyone else in his range. People like Jacob Perreault are what you would call high risk, high reward picks, because he has a chance that he never gets close to the NHL because of his work effort/defensive game, but he could also end up as a consistent 40 goal scorer. Guhle is the kind of guy that could be a depth NHL defenseman, or he could be a really good 2nd pairing D. That doesn’t strike me as “high risk, high reward”.