SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dubois wants to be traded asap

Created by: Depressed_Flames_Fan
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 13, 2021
Published: Jan. 13, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
CGY
  1. Dubois, Pierre-Luc
CBJ
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Zavgorodny, Dmitri
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (EDM)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$81,500,000$66,201,666$0$457,500$15,298,334
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Gaudreau, Johnny
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
Dubois, Pierre-Luc
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Lindholm, Elias
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Tkachuk, Matthew
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Backlund, Mikael
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Mangiapane, Andrew
$2,425,000$2,425,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Dubé, Dillon
$778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Bennett, Sam
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Leivo, Josh
$875,000$875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Lucic, Milan
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Nordström, Joakim
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Simon, Dominik
$700,000$700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Giordano, Mark
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Andersson, Rasmus
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Markström, Jacob
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Hanifin, Noah
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Tanev, Christopher
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Rittich, David
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Välimäki, Juuso
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Nesterov, Nikita
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Ryan, Derek
$3,125,000$3,125,000 ($2,050,000$2M$2,050,000$2M)
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Mackey, Connor
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Kylington, Oliver
$787,500$787,500 ($0$0$0$0)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Robinson, Buddy
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Domingue, Louis
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
Rinaldo, Zac
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 13, 2021 at 11:30 p.m.
#1
deys3232
Hockee
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 868
You gotta add at least a 1st round pick in that trade along with Monahan. Maybe a guy like Bennett as well
Jan. 13, 2021 at 11:32 p.m.
#2
Depressed_Flames_Fan
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 994
Likes: 227
Quoting: deys3232
You gotta add at least a 1st round pick in that trade along with Monahan. Maybe a guy like Bennett as well


I personally think Monahan is better the Dubois, but the age difference
Jan. 13, 2021 at 11:42 p.m.
#3
Ledge_And_Dairy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,217
Likes: 19,489
Quoting: deys3232
You gotta add at least a 1st round pick in that trade along with Monahan. Maybe a guy like Bennett as well


Really? Dubois for Monahan is basically a wash, difference is age and that's not worth a 1st++

This trade is basically just moving deck chairs, if Calgary wants Dubois for center depth trading Monahan away in the process is counterproductive
GenXHockey and palhal liked this.
Jan. 13, 2021 at 11:50 p.m.
#4
palhal
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,401
Likes: 22,624
"DUBOIS WANTS TO BE TRADED ASAP". It's fair trade. But CBJ isn't trading a player just because he wants to be traded. Trade him and then he have a lineup at the GM door every time a player is upset and then he demands to be traded too.
GenXHockey liked this.
Jan. 13, 2021 at 11:53 p.m.
#5
GenXHockey
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,156
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Really? Dubois for Monahan is basically a wash, difference is age and that's not worth a 1st++

This trade is basically just moving deck chairs, if Calgary wants Dubois for center depth trading Monahan away in the process is counterproductive


Monahan for Dubois is a perceived wash but Calgary would win that one for one. Dubois lindholm and backlund would be nice.

You know my thoughts on Monahan though. Nothing against the guy but he does not play that complete game you need from a 1c.
Jan. 14, 2021 at 12:02 a.m.
#6
Ledge_And_Dairy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,217
Likes: 19,489
Quoting: Jamiepo
Monahan for Dubois is a perceived wash but Calgary would win that one for one. Dubois lindholm and backlund would be nice.

You know my thoughts on Monahan though. Nothing against the guy but he does not play that complete game you need from a 1c.


Don't get me wrong, I would absolutely love Dubois on the team, I just don't think the answer is moving Monahan +++. Rarely do you ever see hockey trades like that now, if Dubois is moved it is much more likely to be for something like Schenn or ROR to STL
GenXHockey liked this.
Jan. 14, 2021 at 12:07 a.m.
#7
GenXHockey
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,156
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Don't get me wrong, I would absolutely love Dubois on the team, I just don't think the answer is moving Monahan +++. Rarely do you ever see hockey trades like that now, if Dubois is moved it is much more likely to be for something like Schenn or ROR to STL


I agree with that. But teams just don’t seem to make those bad trades anymore. Look what jarmo got for Anderson. Makes the pld monogram swap look more likely. What other pieces could you see going over?
Jan. 14, 2021 at 12:09 a.m.
#8
GenXHockey
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,156
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: palhal
"DUBOIS WANTS TO BE TRADED ASAP". It's fair trade. But CBJ isn't trading a player just because he wants to be traded. Trade him and then he have a lineup at the GM door every time a player is upset and then he demands to be traded too.


Can’t argue with that reasoning. Gotta think they keep him this year provided that they are competetive and he isn’t a disruption.
palhal liked this.
Jan. 14, 2021 at 12:17 a.m.
#9
Bolts_Fan_Dan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 610
Quoting: palhal
"DUBOIS WANTS TO BE TRADED ASAP". It's fair trade. But CBJ isn't trading a player just because he wants to be traded. Trade him and then he have a lineup at the GM door every time a player is upset and then he demands to be traded too.


Jarmo kekaleinen has to walk away with a win to send PLD ANYWHERE
Jan. 14, 2021 at 12:23 a.m.
#10
Ledge_And_Dairy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,217
Likes: 19,489
Quoting: Jamiepo
I agree with that. But teams just don’t seem to make those bad trades anymore. Look what jarmo got for Anderson. Makes the pld monogram swap look more likely. What other pieces could you see going over?


I disagree with this, selling for futures is way more common then legitimate hockey trades now-a-days. As for what Calgary would be trading it would probably have to include at least one of Ryan/Bennett/Mange for cap reasons, then either a very good prospect + a 1st or two 1sts. IDK though, hard to say
Jan. 14, 2021 at 12:33 a.m.
#11
GenXHockey
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 21,156
Likes: 10,700
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I disagree with this, selling for futures is way more common then legitimate hockey trades now-a-days. As for what Calgary would be trading it would probably have to include at least one of Ryan/Bennett/Mange for cap reasons, then either a very good prospect + a 1st or two 1sts. IDK though, hard to say


First and a prospect seems a bit light to me. Maybe with mangiapane it’s a bit better but they will be looking for a servicable top 6 centre. Non of those options are that. Just my opinion though. Flames wouldn’t swap monohan for pld anyway. Just me I guess lol.
Ledge_And_Dairy liked this.
Jan. 14, 2021 at 12:41 a.m.
#12
Ledge_And_Dairy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,217
Likes: 19,489
Quoting: Jamiepo
First and a prospect seems a bit light to me. Maybe with mangiapane it’s a bit better but they will be looking for a servicable top 6 centre. Non of those options are that. Just my opinion though. Flames wouldn’t swap monohan for pld anyway. Just me I guess lol.


Oh no I wasn't saying just a 1st and prospect. The issue is there aren't a lot of examples of young top 6 centers being traded
Jan. 14, 2021 at 12:54 a.m.
#13
Ledge_And_Dairy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,217
Likes: 19,489
Quoting: Jamiepo
First and a prospect seems a bit light to me. Maybe with mangiapane it’s a bit better but they will be looking for a servicable top 6 centre. Non of those options are that. Just my opinion though. Flames wouldn’t swap monohan for pld anyway. Just me I guess lol.


The Jordan Staal traded could be a decent example as well
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll