SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Prospects with high chance of busting from each team

Created by: Cdn_bacon
Team: 2020-21 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 14, 2021
Published: Jan. 14, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
31$1$26,902,459$0$13,382,500-$26,902,458
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
RFA - 5
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$894,167$894,167
C, LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$894,167$894,167
LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$760,000$760,000 (Performance Bonus$70,000$70K)
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$894,167$894,167
C
RFA - 4
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$874,125$874,125
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$375,000$375K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$811,667$811,667 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Islanders
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
$894,167$894,167
C, LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$710,000$710K)
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$825,833$825,833
C
RFA - 5
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$925,000$925,000
LW, C
RFA - 4
Logo of the Washington Capitals
$894,167$894,167
LW, C
RFA - 4
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the St. Louis Blues
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$811,667$811,667 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 14, 2021 at 2:45 p.m.
#26
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: A_Habs_fan
So why was i quoted ?


Sorry lol, I was gonna respond to your comment to include studnicka as a guy who obviously wont bust

my b
A_Habs_fan liked this.
Jan. 14, 2021 at 2:47 p.m.
#27
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 610
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lmao guys wtf is the deal here. Propeller is 100% correct and mhockey has no clue whats going on

Studnicka was a 2nd rounder, if he is even a 3rd or 2nd line guy he wont be a Bust so @Cdn_bacon take Studnicka off of this list and put Senyshyn on 9obviously
Also Studnicka is literally projected to be a top 6 center (by like 99% of hockey websites) so yeah 1st or 2nd line is correct, NOT 2nd or 3rd like mhockey said

Why do these arguments happen, Im glad I can be here at least to dispel the argument and just point out once and for all who is right here

Again an opinion is an opinion as Propeller said, but no need to be rude about it or try to say someone else is wrong lmao mhockey


No lol
Jan. 14, 2021 at 2:49 p.m.
#28
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,753
Likes: 7,634
Bouchard? I don't see how he has a high chance of being a bust. He's a sure-fire NHLer who will put up points, the only question is at what level will he be able to defend.
Jan. 14, 2021 at 2:51 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,753
Likes: 7,634
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lmao guys wtf is the deal here. Propeller is 100% correct and mhockey has no clue whats going on

Studnicka was a 2nd rounder, if he is even a 3rd or 2nd line guy he wont be a Bust so @Cdn_bacon take Studnicka off of this list and put Senyshyn on 9obviously
Also Studnicka is literally projected to be a top 6 center (by like 99% of hockey websites) so yeah 1st or 2nd line is correct, NOT 2nd or 3rd like mhockey said

Why do these arguments happen, Im glad I can be here at least to dispel the argument and just point out once and for all who is right here

Again an opinion is an opinion as Propeller said, but no need to be rude about it or try to say someone else is wrong lmao mhockey


tears of joy
UpsideDownQue liked this.
Jan. 14, 2021 at 2:53 p.m.
#30
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lmao guys wtf is the deal here. Propeller is 100% correct and mhockey has no clue whats going on

Studnicka was a 2nd rounder, if he is even a 3rd or 2nd line guy he wont be a Bust so @Cdn_bacon take Studnicka off of this list and put Senyshyn on 9obviously
Also Studnicka is literally projected to be a top 6 center (by like 99% of hockey websites) so yeah 1st or 2nd line is correct, NOT 2nd or 3rd like mhockey said

Why do these arguments happen, Im glad I can be here at least to dispel the argument and just point out once and for all who is right here

Again an opinion is an opinion as Propeller said, but no need to be rude about it or try to say someone else is wrong lmao mhockey



How on earth was I wrong? He literally said Studnika’s “floor”, is a prime keslar. Maybe you forgot how good prime kesler was but that’s a guy scoring 30+ goals with ease and constantly being in the running for the Selke (and winning it once). Don’t you think that’s a little ridiculous? He projects to be a middle 6 centre, not a 1C pal. No one pegs him as a 1C other than homers like you. You didn’t dispel any argument. You’re just continuing this delusion that Studinka is better than he actually is. He’s a good prospect, and if he develops into a 2C or even a 3C that’s a huge success for Boston. Could he become a future 1C? Sure it’s possible but that’s definitely not his projection at the moment. If he ends up being a 50 ish point two way centre bruins fans are going to be VERY VERY happy.
vr1995 liked this.
Jan. 14, 2021 at 2:54 p.m.
#31
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: CD282
tears of joy


This guys such a homer. No one is projecting studnika to be a legit 1C. Maybe on Boston because their C prospects are so bad and they have nobody to replace Bergeron, but it’s highly unlikely he’s a legitimate 1C on a cup contending team
CD282 liked this.
Jan. 14, 2021 at 3:51 p.m.
#32
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 23,753
Likes: 7,634
Quoting: mhockey91
This guys such a homer. No one is projecting studnika to be a legit 1C. Maybe on Boston because their C prospects are so bad and they have nobody to replace Bergeron, but it’s highly unlikely he’s a legitimate 1C on a cup contending team


I know next to nothing about the prospect in question, but he's 22 next month and has played a grand total of 2 NHL games. Not many top-6 center prospects are in the minors at 21/22 - especially when depth on the big club isn't blocking them. (FYI: he's currently on their taxi squad as far as I can tell.)
mhockey91 liked this.
Jan. 14, 2021 at 3:53 p.m.
#33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: CD282
I know next to nothing about the prospect in question, but he's 22 next month and has played a grand total of 2 NHL games. Not many top-6 center prospects are in the minors at 21/22 - especially when depth on the big club isn't blocking them. (FYI: he's currently on their taxi squad as far as I can tell.)


I think it’s possible he could become a good 2C, but there is a big difference between a 2C and a 1C. I still think my favourite comment is that his FLOOR is a PRIME keslar. That made my day
CD282 liked this.
Jan. 14, 2021 at 8:09 p.m.
#34
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: Cdn_bacon
No lol


Quoting: CD282
tears of joy


Quoting: mhockey91
How on earth was I wrong? He literally said Studnika’s “floor”, is a prime keslar. Maybe you forgot how good prime kesler was but that’s a guy scoring 30+ goals with ease and constantly being in the running for the Selke (and winning it once). Don’t you think that’s a little ridiculous? He projects to be a middle 6 centre, not a 1C pal. No one pegs him as a 1C other than homers like you. You didn’t dispel any argument. You’re just continuing this delusion that Studinka is better than he actually is. He’s a good prospect, and if he develops into a 2C or even a 3C that’s a huge success for Boston. Could he become a future 1C? Sure it’s possible but that’s definitely not his projection at the moment. If he ends up being a 50 ish point two way centre bruins fans are going to be VERY VERY happy.


Lmao of course thats not his floor, but the overall gist that Studnicka might be a bust is completely wrong. Just learn a little hocjkey and you will know that. Its like saying Jack Hughes is a bust cuz he was bad last year.
Not gonna keep arguing tho, either acknowledge that im right or just be ignorant and biased against the bruins on your own time. I dont care
Jan. 14, 2021 at 8:38 p.m.
#35
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Quoting: Silkysmooth42
Lmao of course thats not his floor, but the overall gist that Studnicka might be a bust is completely wrong. Just learn a little hocjkey and you will know that. Its like saying Jack Hughes is a bust cuz he was bad last year.
Not gonna keep arguing tho, either acknowledge that im right or just be ignorant and biased against the bruins on your own time. I dont care


I never once said he was gonna be a bust, so I’m not acknowledging you’re right. I say he’s gonna be a 2C / 3C. Depends how he develops. He’s probably not gonna be this hidden gem 1C. Sure it’s possible, but it’s unlikely and not his projection. Right now he projects to be a solid 2C, I agree with that.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 1:25 p.m.
#36
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: mhockey91
I never once said he was gonna be a bust, so I’m not acknowledging you’re right. I say he’s gonna be a 2C / 3C. Depends how he develops. He’s probably not gonna be this hidden gem 1C. Sure it’s possible, but it’s unlikely and not his projection. Right now he projects to be a solid 2C, I agree with that.


Exactly. The only point me and propeller made was that Studnicka should not be on this list. Put Senyshyn here (considering Zboril is currently on the team)...
Thats all! Glad we agree
mhockey91 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll