SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Predicting The Top RWs From 2010-2020

Created by: Agent_Of_R9
Team: 2020-21 Custom Team
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 15, 2021
Published: Jan. 15, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
1. Kane (SNP 95)
2. Kucherov (PLY 94)
3. Pastrnak (SNP 93)
4. Rantanen (PWF 91)
5. Marner (PLY 90)
6. Laine (SNP 90)
7. Kaprizov (SNP 90)
8. W.Nylander (SNP 90)
9. E.Lindholm (PLY 90)
10. Raymond (PLY 90)

Honourable Mentions:
Kakko (SNP 90)
Necas (SNP 89)
Teravainen (PLY 89)
Fiala (SNP 89)
Mantha (PWF 89)
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
15$81,500,000$70,640,366$0$4,112,500$10,859,634
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$4,995,000$4,995,000
C, RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Raymond, Lucas
$925,000$925,000
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 15, 2021 at 3:58 p.m.
#1
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,396
Likes: 996
Thoughts on this ranking?
oilersguy liked this.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 3:59 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,202
Likes: 5,207
I think Marner is better than Rantanen but I won't nit-pick. Not bad

I assume u meant 2020s-2030s? And Kane is way too old to be on that ranking
vr1995, imawesome, mhockey91 and 1 other person liked this.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 4:07 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,573
Likes: 5,453
Agreed with most but Kane is 32 and Chicago is rebuilding. Most of the other wingers are 20-25, they will pass him (and play more seasons).
hockeyconnor97 and BuFfaLOFaN liked this.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 4:10 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,251
Likes: 19,514
Quoting: bhavikp27
Agreed with most but Kane is 32 and Chicago is rebuilding. Most of the other wings are 20-25, they will pass him (and play more seasons).


Kane's playstyle ages well, he will be solid until at least 36/37
Jan. 15, 2021 at 4:16 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 15,921
Likes: 6,980
Yeah this must be 2020-2030 right
Jan. 15, 2021 at 4:38 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 7,880
Likes: 6,386
Kane probably shouldn't be here due to his age
Jan. 15, 2021 at 4:51 p.m.
#7
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Kane's playstyle ages well, he will be solid until at least 36/37


Even if that is true, that is only 4 years from now and his best days are behind him. He won't be among the best RW's in the next decade.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 4:58 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,251
Likes: 19,514
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Even if that is true, that is only 4 years from now and his best days are behind him. He won't be among the best RW's in the next decade.


Maybe, Datsyuk was still 1 of the top centers from last decade and he only played half of it. Same thing with McDavid and Matthews, they only played half and are considered top centers of the decade
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:41 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,396
Likes: 996
Quoting: leafs101
I think Marner is better than Rantanen but I won't nit-pick. Not bad

I assume u meant 2020s-2030s? And Kane is way too old to be on that ranking


Quoting: bhavikp27
Agreed with most but Kane is 32 and Chicago is rebuilding. Most of the other wingers are 20-25, they will pass him (and play more seasons).


Quoting: mhockey91
Yeah this must be 2020-2030 right


Quoting: TheAlien
Kane probably shouldn't be here due to his age


Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Even if that is true, that is only 4 years from now and his best days are behind him. He won't be among the best RW's in the next decade.


Normally I wouldn’t want to include players at Kane’s age but I feel his situation is different. There was a sports expert who stated he has the talent and playing style to still be effective until he’s in his 40s.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:42 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,396
Likes: 996
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Maybe, Datsyuk was still 1 of the top centers from last decade and he only played half of it. Same thing with McDavid and Matthews, they only played half and are considered top centers of the decade


I included Datsyuk, Matthews and McDavid because they were just so dominant even in their small sample size.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:43 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 11,202
Likes: 5,207
Quoting: Penguins_Legend_Sheary
Normally I wouldn’t want to include players at Kane’s age but I feel his situation is different. There was a sports expert who stated he has the talent and playing style to still be effective until he’s in his 40s.


effective, maybe, but not the #1 winger in the world.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:44 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Marner Enthusiast
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 4,396
Likes: 996
Quoting: leafs101
effective, maybe, but not the #1 winger in the world.


Fair enough.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 7:23 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,251
Likes: 19,514
Quoting: Penguins_Legend_Sheary
I included Datsyuk, Matthews and McDavid because they were just so dominant even in their small sample size.


That's my point, even if Kane is only dominant in the first half then falls off that is still enough to qualify him for the top 10
Jan. 23, 2021 at 4:57 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,266
Quoting: leafs101
I think Marner is better than Rantanen but I won't nit-pick. Not bad

I assume u meant 2020s-2030s? And Kane is way too old to be on that ranking


Quoting: bhavikp27
Agreed with most but Kane is 32 and Chicago is rebuilding. Most of the other wingers are 20-25, they will pass him (and play more seasons).


I agree with these:

If you mean 2010 to 2020, then you have too much recency bias, by a lot.
If you mean 2020 to 2030, Kane shouldnt be there
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll