SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How much does BUF add

Created by: Bdawwwgy1
Team: 2020-21 Columbus Blue Jackets
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 15, 2021
Published: Jan. 15, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
CBJ
  1. Skinner, Jeff ($2,500,000 retained)
BUF
  1. Dubois, Pierre-Luc
Additional Details:
I know Buffalo adds a ton, but what exactly
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
2022
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the ANA
2023
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$67,403,292$0$1,475,000$14,096,708
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,375,000$1,375,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,325,000$1,325,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$975,000$975,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$897,500$897,500
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$3,750,000$3,750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$874,125$874,125
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,750,000$2,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$375,000$375K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,062,500$1,062,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,800,000$2,800,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,633,333$1,633,333
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,650,000$1,650,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$725,000$725,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$700,000$700,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,850,000$5,850,000
C, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$916,667$916,667 ($0$0$0$0) (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$750,000$750,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$725,000$725,000 ($0$0$0$0)
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$700,000$700,000 ($0$0$0$0)
C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 15, 2021 at 5:40 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Probably Cozens

Edit: For some reason I didn't see the retention. In general I'd imagine they'll want a center for Dubois, not a winger, but Skinner at $6.5M has value.
csick liked this.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 5:40 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 782
Likes: 122
What about Reinhart, 2020 1st and Mittelstadt
Jan. 15, 2021 at 5:40 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,506
Likes: 6,514
With that much retention it's debatable, I mean probably send you Mittlstadt, and let's say a first and another B prospect. Skinner is worth the money at 6.5
Jan. 15, 2021 at 5:41 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 9,506
Likes: 6,514
Quoting: TanSor
Probably Cozens


Really?
Quoting: gerowrj16
What about Reinhart, 2020 1st and Mittelstadt


Really?
I think Skinner at 6.5 is worth alot and the sabres are retaining 2.5...at that point Skinner isn't a cap dump but a valuable piece
TanSor liked this.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 5:43 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 782
Likes: 122
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
Really?

Really?
I think Skinner at 6.5 is worth alot and the sabres are retaining 2.5...at that point Skinner isn't a cap dump but a valuable piece


I am talking about Reinhart, 1st and Mittelstadt in a package not including Skinner
csick liked this.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 5:43 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 7,071
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
Really?

Really?
I think Skinner at 6.5 is worth alot and the sabres are retaining 2.5...at that point Skinner isn't a cap dump but a valuable piece


Edited my comment, didn't see the retention for some reason.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 5:58 p.m.
#7
Pistol Pete
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 1,479
I believe skinner has the worst contract in the whole nhl other than erik karlsson. You can't start with a negative for Dubois.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:06 p.m.
#8
Sabres are elite
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,979
Likes: 3,299
Quoting: Zmach
I believe skinner has the worst contract in the whole nhl other than erik karlsson. You can't start with a negative for Dubois.


Vlasic and Burns are much worse
Bdawwwgy1 liked this.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:12 p.m.
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,072
Likes: 22,466
Skinner even at 6.5m really has negative value in today's NHL. CBJ just for cap reasons don't even listen to any deal if Skinner is included.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:19 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1,984
Quoting: palhal
Skinner even at 6.5m really has negative value in today's NHL. CBJ just for cap reasons don't even listen to any deal if Skinner is included.


That’s just incredibly false. Even with his terrible last year, he’s averaged 29 goals a per 82 over his career. Scores most at even strength as well. He doesn’t have negative value at 6.5. Full value of the contract you bet. At 6.5 not even close to negative value
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:25 p.m.
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 59,072
Likes: 22,466
Quoting: Lsendel3
That’s just incredibly false. Even with his terrible last year, he’s averaged 29 goals a per 82 over his career. Scores most at even strength as well. He doesn’t have negative value at 6.5. Full value of the contract you bet. At 6.5 not even close to negative value


We can have this discussion in another 7 years. IMO Skinner peaked two seasons and now at the age of 28 will have terrible value going forward. For Skinners sake and Buffalo fans....I hope for their sake, Skinner has a good career.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:25 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 749
Likes: 289
Quoting: Lsendel3
That’s just incredibly false. Even with his terrible last year, he’s averaged 29 goals a per 82 over his career. Scores most at even strength as well. He doesn’t have negative value at 6.5. Full value of the contract you bet. At 6.5 not even close to negative value


He needs to show he is still elite/good. His terrible season can’t be ignored until he bounces back. If he was a free agent no one would sign him for 6.5, he would get a prove it deal like Barrie and Hoffman.

It’s like Loui Ericksson before he signed with Vancouver. He never turned it around and Vancouver is stuck with an anchor. Skinner can turn it around but until he does no team will touch him or his contract.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:30 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1,984
Quoting: palhal
We can have this discussion in another 7 years. IMO Skinner peaked two seasons and now at the age of 28 will have terrible value going forward. For Skinners sake and Buffalo fans....I hope for their sake, Skinner has a good career.


Of course it’ll take time to play out. That’s why I hate the really intense Matthews Eichel who’s better debates. How about we just say they’re both really good young players and one will take off over the other or maybe not in 5-10 years. Then have that discussion. My point was that even taking out the 40 goal season (he won’t return to that) and last season (his career to date that has been the worst season so would assume he wouldn’t return to that either) he’s a near 30 goal scorer at even strength. Those guys have value, lots of it. Before he went to Buf and got 40, I bet most teams woulda gladly signed him for 6.5 long term. One incredible and one disappointing season doesn’t really change the sentence before in my mind. And I just want him around that 30 goal mark. He’ll never live up to 9M, but if he gets 25/30 a year, I can live with it (not that i really got a choice)
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:33 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1,984
Quoting: CeciGOAT
He needs to show he is still elite/good. His terrible season can’t be ignored until he bounces back. If he was a free agent no one would sign him for 6.5, he would get a prove it deal like Barrie and Hoffman.

It’s like Loui Ericksson before he signed with Vancouver. He never turned it around and Vancouver is stuck with an anchor. Skinner can turn it around but until he does no team will touch him or his contract.


So you don’t think without the pandemic that coming off a 40 goal season and then having a bad, injury plagued year he still couldn’t have signed for 6.5? Even tho his entire career suggests otherwise? Then I will just disagree. Some team would have gladly taken him at 6.5. ****, his contract before that was like 5.25 I believe. You thinking he was gonna take a cut?
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:40 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 749
Likes: 289
Quoting: Lsendel3
So you don’t think without the pandemic that coming off a 40 goal season and then having a bad, injury plagued year he still couldn’t have signed for 6.5? Even tho his entire career suggests otherwise? Then I will just disagree. Some team would have gladly taken him at 6.5. ****, his contract before that was like 5.25 I believe. You thinking he was gonna take a cut?


No that’s not what I’m saying. I’m not talking about after his 40 goal season. I’m talking about this offseason that just passed. Mike Hoffman coming of 36 and 29 (shortened season) goal seasons just signed for 1x4m. He took a pay cut because no one was offering him big money and term. Skinner is coming off a terrible year, do you think the same teams that wouldn’t offer mike Hoffman 5 or 6 million would give 6.5 x 7 to skinner after a terrible season?
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:48 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1,984
Quoting: CeciGOAT
No that’s not what I’m saying. I’m not talking about after his 40 goal season. I’m talking about this offseason that just passed. Mike Hoffman coming of 36 and 29 (shortened season) goal seasons just signed for 1x4m. He took a pay cut because no one was offering him big money and term. Skinner is coming off a terrible year, do you think the same teams that wouldn’t offer mike Hoffman 5 or 6 million would give 6.5 x 7 to skinner after a terrible season?


When they signed matters. Revenue was going up when skinner signed his 9M (we all agree it was too high). Had Hoffman had that same season without covid, no way he’s signing a one year deal. That’s my point. If your saying in order to trade him at 6.5, I can see your point. Gonna be tough if Ralph keeps playing him with plugs.
CeciGOAT liked this.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 6:52 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 749
Likes: 289
Quoting: Lsendel3
When they signed matters. Revenue was going up when skinner signed his 9M (we all agree it was too high). Had Hoffman had that same season without covid, no way he’s signing a one year deal. That’s my point. If your saying in order to trade him at 6.5, I can see your point. Gonna be tough if Ralph keeps playing him with plugs.


I think he was definitely worth 6.5+ when he signed. I was talking about his value now when it came to the trade. Also agreed, he needs to play in the top 6, or atleast with cozens on the third.
Lsendel3 liked this.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 7:38 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 757
Quoting: Lsendel3
So you don’t think without the pandemic that coming off a 40 goal season and then having a bad, injury plagued year he still couldn’t have signed for 6.5? Even tho his entire career suggests otherwise? Then I will just disagree. Some team would have gladly taken him at 6.5. ****, his contract before that was like 5.25 I believe. You thinking he was gonna take a cut?


The guy is playing on the 4th line in Buffalo...
Jan. 15, 2021 at 10:19 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1,984
Quoting: Mike_Gartner
The guy is playing on the 4th line in Buffalo...


If you really think that’s what he is, that says more about you.
Jan. 15, 2021 at 10:31 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 1,850
Reinhart & Dubois are pretty close imo
Give Dubois the edge bc he plays Center....
but CBj could always just put Reinhart back at Center
where he belongs
Jan. 15, 2021 at 10:33 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 5,120
Likes: 1,850
Quoting: Lsendel3
That’s just incredibly false. Even with his terrible last year, he’s averaged 29 goals a per 82 over his career. Scores most at even strength as well. He doesn’t have negative value at 6.5. Full value of the contract you bet. At 6.5 not even close to negative value


He’s a Leafs fan
Don’t bother wasting your time with him
Jan. 15, 2021 at 10:39 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 757
Quoting: Lsendel3
If you really think that’s what he is, that says more about you.


Bub, this has nothing to do with me.
All I’m saying is that Skinner is a $9m 4th liner on a bottom 5 team in the league.

Did he not play on the 4th line tonight?
Jan. 15, 2021 at 10:45 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1,984
Quoting: Mike_Gartner
Bub, this has nothing to do with me.
All I’m saying is that Skinner is a $9m 4th liner on a bottom 5 team in the league.

Did he not play on the 4th line tonight?


If you actually think Skinner is or ever has been 4th line talent, ya it says more about you. Whatever is going on with Ralph and Skinner isn’t representative of Skinners talent. So ya, calling him a fourth liner is ****ing stupid and you know it and are trolling. By that so simplistic form of looking at it, Ovechkin has been benched because of lack of D zone in the past. 4th liner. Last post you’ll get from me on this
Jan. 15, 2021 at 10:53 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 757
Quoting: Lsendel3
If you actually think Skinner is or ever has been 4th line talent, ya it says more about you. Whatever is going on with Ralph and Skinner isn’t representative of Skinners talent. So ya, calling him a fourth liner is ****ing stupid and you know it and are trolling. By that so simplistic form of looking at it, Ovechkin has been benched because of lack of D zone in the past. 4th liner. Last post you’ll get from me on this


If someone plays on the 4th line, what do you call them?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll